scholarly journals Patient-Perceived Quality of Life after Total Hip Arthroplasty: Elective versus Traumatological Surgery

2011 ◽  
Vol 2011 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alessandro Aprato ◽  
Alessandro Massè ◽  
Francesco Caranzano ◽  
Renato Matteotti ◽  
Patrick Pautasso ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Femoral Neck ◽  
Femoral Neck Fracture ◽  
Womac Score ◽  
X Rays ◽  
Length Discrepancy ◽  
Neck Fracture ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Purpose. The aim was to evaluate and compare patient's health-related quality of life after THA for osteoarthritis and femoral neck fracture. The postoperative outcome was retrospectively evaluated in patients who underwent THA with an intracapsular femoral neck fracture (Group A) or with an hip osteoarthritis (Group B). Methods. Length discrepancy was measured on postoperative X-rays. Study groups were compared as to age, results of WOMAC and SF-36 tests, limb length discrepancy (LLD) by independent group t-test. Correlations between LLD and results obtained atWOMAC test were performed. 117 patients were enrolled. The 2 groups were similar as to age, type of implanted stem and sex. Mean follow up was 2,4 years for group A and 2,3 years for group B. Results. WOMAC score was found higher in group A in all items examinated. Correlation tests did not indicate a statistically significant linear relationship between LLD and WOMAC score in both groups. Conclusions. Patients who received THA for arthritis have better perception of quality of life than traumatologic patients. Although LLD should always be strongly considered by the surgeons performing a THA, LLD alone can't be considered as an indicator of patient dissatisfaction or clinical bad result after a 2-year followup.

scholarly journals Gotfried reduction and cannulated screws fixation in the treatment of femoral neck fracture in young adults

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kai Huang ◽  
Xiaohui Fang ◽  
Guijun Li ◽  
Jiajun Yue
Keyword(s):  
Femoral Neck ◽  
Femoral Neck Fracture ◽  
Clinical Results ◽  
Anatomic Reduction ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Reduction Group ◽  
Neck Fracture ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Abstract Background: Although many available surgical procedures for displaced femoral neck fractures in young patients, there are still many challenges to achieve satisfactory results. The incidence of avascular necrosis and nonunion rates remain relatively high despite the progress in our understanding and surgical technique. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy of gotfried reduction and cannulated screw fixation in the treatment of femoral neck fracture for young adults.Methods: A retrospective analysis was made on 67 cases from May 2013 to March 2019. They were divided into three groups according to the first postoperative anteroposterior view of hip X-ray: Anatomic reduction (group A), Gotfried positive buttress reduction (group B), and Gotfried negative buttress reduction (group C). The incidence of avascular osteonecrosis of the femoral head (AVN) and the Harris scores of hip joints were compared in three groups at the last follow-up.Results: There were 21 cases (mean age,49.7 ± 11.6) in group A, 24 cases (mean age, 48.6 ± 11.3) in group B, 22 cases (mean age,48.3 ± 12.4) in group C. No significant difference in general preoperative demographics (P>0．05).The incidence of avascular necrosis of femoral head in Group A, B, and C was 19.05%,20.83%, and 22.73 %, respectively, showing no significant difference between groups(P=0．156). The mean Harris hip scores at the final follow-up for groups A (85．6±6．7)and B (84．5±6．2) were significantly higher than group C (74．3±8.3), and the difference was statistically significant(P=0．043).Conclusions: Gotfried positive buttress reduction and fixation for femoral neck fracture may lead to similar clinical results with anatomic reduction, but much better than Gotfried negative buttress reduction. For the patients of femoral neck fracture with severe displacement and difficulty in reduction, it is not necessary to pursue anatomical reduction。Achieving positive valgus reduction can also obtain satisfactory clinical results, and should try to avoid negative buttress.

scholarly journals Assessing the effect of gotfried reduction with positive buttress pattern in the young femoral neck fracture

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kai Huang ◽  
Xiaohui Fang ◽  
Guijun Li ◽  
Jiajun Yue
Keyword(s):  
Femoral Neck ◽  
Femoral Neck Fracture ◽  
Clinical Results ◽  
Anatomic Reduction ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Reduction Group ◽  
Neck Fracture ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Abstract Background: Although many available surgical procedures for displaced femoral neck fractures in young patients, there are still many challenges to achieve satisfactory results. The incidence of avascular necrosis and nonunion rates remain relatively high despite the progress in our understanding and surgical technique. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy of gotfried reduction and cannulated screw fixation in the treatment of femoral neck fracture for young adults. Methods: A retrospective analysis was made on 67 cases from May 2013 to March 2019. They were divided into three groups according to the first postoperative anteroposterior view of hip X-ray: Anatomic reduction (group A), Gotfried positive buttress reduction (group B), and Gotfried negative buttress reduction (group C). The incidence of avascular osteonecrosis of the femoral head ( AVN ) and the Harris scores of hip joints were compared in three groups at the last follow-up. Results: The mean follow-up period after surgery was 22.5 ± 11.3 (range, 11–34) months. There were 21 cases (mean age,49.7 ± 11.6) in group A, 24 cases (mean age, 48.6 ± 11.3) in group B, 22 cases (mean age,48.3 ± 12.4) in group C. No significant difference in general preoperative demographics (P>0．05). The incidence of avascular necrosis of femoral head in Group A, B, and C was 19.05%,20.83%, and 22.73 %, respectively, showing no significant difference between groups(P=0．156). The mean Harris hip scores at the final follow-up for groups A (85．6±6．7)and B (84．5±6．2) were significantly higher than group C (74．3±8.3), and the difference was statistically significant(P=0．043). The incidence of femoral neck shortening in group A and group B was significantly lower than that in group C in postoperative one year, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusions: Gotfried positive buttress reduction and fixation for femoral neck fracture may lead to similar clinical results with anatomic reduction, but much better than Gotfried negative buttress reduction. For the patients of femoral neck fracture with severe displacement and difficulty reduction, it is not necessary to pursue anatomical reduction。 Achieving positive valgus reduction can also obtain satisfactory clinical results, and should try to avoid negative buttress.

scholarly journals Restoration of Hip Biomechanics after a Hemiarthroplasty for a Femoral Neck Fracture—Who Does It Better?

Life ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 49
Author(s):  
Dylan Tanzer ◽  
Aslan Baradaran ◽  
Adam Hart ◽  
Michael Tanzer
Keyword(s):  
Femoral Neck ◽  
Femoral Neck Fracture ◽  
Normal Function ◽  
Leg Length ◽  
Femoral Offset ◽  
Hip Biomechanics ◽  
Orthopedic Surgeons ◽  
Neck Fracture ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Introduction: The restoration of the preoperative biomechanics of the hip, in particular leg length and femoral offset, are critical in restoring normal function and diminishing the risk of dislocation following hip arthroplasty. This study compares the consistency of arthroplasty and non-arthroplasty orthopedic surgeons in restoring the normal biomechanics of the hip when performing a hemiarthroplasty for the treatment of a femoral neck fracture. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the preoperative and postoperative digital radiographs of 175 hips that had a modular hemiarthroplasty for the treatment of a displaced femoral neck fracture at a Level 1 academic hospital. Fifty-two hips were treated by one of the three fellowship-trained arthroplasty surgeons (Group A), and 123 were treated by one of the nine non-arthroplasty fellowship-trained orthopedic surgeons (Group B). Results: Patients in Group A were more likely to have their femoral offset restored to normal than patients in Group B, both with respect to under correcting the offset (p = 0.031) and overcorrecting the offset (p = 0.010). Overall, there was no difference in restoration of leg lengths between the two groups (p = 0.869). Conclusions: Following a hemiarthroplasty for a displaced femoral neck fracture, the normal biomechanics of the hip are more likely to be restored by an arthroplasty-trained surgeon than by a non-arthroplasty-trained surgeon. Identifying the inconsistency of non-arthroplasty surgeons and, to a lesser degree, arthroplasty surgeons in restoring hip biomechanics is important for sensitizing surgeons to rectify this in the future with appropriate templating and femoral implant selection.

Recovery after Hip Fractures: Influence of Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty on Physical Disability and Social Dependency in the Elderly

2011 ◽  
Vol 21 (6) ◽  
pp. 751-756 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johannes Schneppendahl ◽  
Marcel Betsch ◽  
Vanco Petrov ◽  
Friedrich Böttner ◽  
Simon Thelen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Femoral Neck ◽  
Femoral Neck Fracture ◽  
Geriatric Patients ◽  
Femoral Neck Fractures ◽  
Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty ◽  
Displaced Femoral Neck Fractures ◽  
Neck Fracture ◽  
Original Type

Surgical treatment of femoral neck fractures is associated with a significant impact on quality of life. The aim of this study was to determine the long-term influence of displaced femoral neck fractures treated by bipolar hemiarthroplasty on the activities of daily living, quality of life and social dependency. We studied 487 geriatric patients treated in the years 1989 to 2003. At the beginning of follow-up in 2004, 166 patients were alive and evaluation was carried out on 145 patients (87.3%) at 91.3 (14 - 244) months postoperatively by a standardized questionnaire. All enrolled patients had been treated with cemented bipolar hemiarthroplasty for a displaced femoral neck fracture. Patients were evaluated concerning their average pre- and postoperative ability to walk, the need for assisting devices, type of residency and the SF-12® Score. Femoral neck fracture and hemiarthroplasty had a significant influence on all recorded aspects of quality of life. Even though almost two thirds of the patients needed assisting devices to walk after surgery, about two thirds returned to their original type of accommodation and the majority reached their original degree of mobility. Compared to a normal population no significant impact was observed on the quality of life measured by the SF-12® score. We consider bipolar hemiarthroplasty an effective treatment option for displaced femoral neck fractures in geriatric patients. Most patients returned to their original type of accommodation and level of mobility, even though the majority required a number of assisting devices to do so.

scholarly journals Assessing the effect of Gotfried reduction with positive buttress pattern in the young femoral neck fracture

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kai Huang ◽  
Xiaohui Fang ◽  
Guijun Li ◽  
Jiajun Yue
Keyword(s):  
Femoral Neck ◽  
Femoral Neck Fracture ◽  
Clinical Results ◽  
Anatomic Reduction ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Reduction Group ◽  
Neck Fracture ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Abstract Background Although many available surgical procedures for displaced femoral neck fractures in young patients, there are still many challenges to achieve satisfactory results. The incidence of avascular necrosis and nonunion rates remains relatively high despite the progress in our understanding and surgical technique. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy of Gotfried reduction and cannulated screw fixation in the treatment of femoral neck fracture for young adults. Methods A retrospective analysis was made on 67 cases from May 2013 to March 2019. They were divided into three groups according to the first postoperative anteroposterior view of hip X-ray: Anatomic reduction (group A), Gotfried positive buttress reduction (group B), and Gotfried negative buttress reduction (group C). The incidence of avascular osteonecrosis of the femoral head (AVN) and the Harris scores of hip joints were compared in three groups at the last follow-up. Results The mean follow-up period after surgery was 22.5 ± 11.3 (range, 11–34) months. There were 21 cases (mean age, 49.7 ± 11.6) in group A, 24 cases (mean age, 48.6 ± 11.3) in group B, 22 cases (mean age, 48.3 ± 12.4) in group C. No significant difference in general preoperative demographics (P > 0.05). The incidence of avascular necrosis of femoral head in group A, B, and C was 19.05%, 20.83%, and 22.73%, respectively, showing no significant difference between groups (P = 0.156). The mean Harris hip scores at the final follow-up for groups A (85.6 ± 6.7) and B (84.5 ± 6.2) were significantly higher than group C (74.3 ± 8.3), and the difference was statistically significant (P = 0.043). The incidence of femoral neck shortening in group A and group B was significantly lower than that in group C in postoperative 1 year, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Conclusions Gotfried positive buttress reduction and fixation for femoral neck fracture may lead to similar clinical results with anatomic reduction, but much better than Gotfried negative buttress reduction. For the patients of femoral neck fracture with severe displacement and difficulty reduction, it is not necessary to pursue anatomical reduction. Achieving positive valgus reduction can also obtain satisfactory clinical results, and should try to avoid negative buttress.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document