scholarly journals Giant Retroperitoneal Mucinous Tumor Supportively Diagnosed as a Dedifferentiated Liposarcoma by Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization of MDM2 Gene

ISRN Urology ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 2011 ◽  
pp. 1-4
Author(s):  
Taku Naiki ◽  
Shuzo Hamamoto ◽  
Noriyasu Kawai ◽  
Aya Naiki-Ito ◽  
Yoshiyuki Kojima ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
In Situ Hybridization ◽  
Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization ◽  
Therapeutic Strategy ◽  
Dedifferentiated Liposarcoma ◽  
Fish Analysis ◽  
Mdm2 Gene ◽  
Double Minute ◽  
Murine Double Minute

Surgical resection was performed on a 47-year-old woman for a retroperitoneal mass that weighed 8.5 kg. Histological examination revealed a myxoid sarcomatous tumor. Because diagnosis could not be determined by immunohistochemistry, attention was focused on MDM2 (murine double minute) gene amplification by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis. The tumor was finally determined to be a dedifferentiated liposarcoma. We experienced a case of a giant retroperitoneal dedifferentiated liposarcoma. FISH analysis was useful for the diagnosis and determination of the therapeutic strategy.

scholarly journals Characterizing Atypical BCL6 Signal Patterns Detected by Digital Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (FISH) Analysis

2018 ◽  
Vol 38 (6) ◽  
pp. 619-622
Author(s):  
Michael Liew ◽  
Leslie R. Rowe ◽  
Phillipe Szankasi ◽  
Christian N. Paxton ◽  
Todd Kelley ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
In Situ Hybridization ◽  
Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization ◽  
Fish Analysis

scholarly journals Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (FISH) Analysis of the Locations of the Oligonucleotides 5S rDNA, (AGGGTTT)3, and (TTG)6 in Three Genera of Oleaceae and Their Phylogenetic Framework

Genes ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (5) ◽  
pp. 375 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaomei Luo ◽  
Juncheng Liu
Keyword(s):  
In Situ Hybridization ◽  
Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization ◽  
5S Rdna ◽  
Fish Analysis ◽  
Cytogenetic Map ◽  
Ligustrum Lucidum ◽  
Starting Point ◽  
Central Regions ◽  
Almost All

We report the cytogenetic map for a collection of species in the Oleaceae, and test similarities among the karyotypes relative to their known species phylogeny. The oligonucleotides 5S ribosomal DNA (rDNA), (AGGGTTT)3, and (TTG)6 were used as fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) probes to locate the corresponding chromosomes in three Oleaceae genera: Fraxinus pennsylvanica, Syringa oblata, Ligustrum lucidum, and Ligustrum × vicaryi. Forty-six small chromosomes were identified in four species. (AGGGTTT)3 signals were observed on almost all chromosome ends of four species, but (AGGGTTT)3 played no role in distinguishing the chromosomes but displayed intact chromosomes and could thus be used as a guide for finding chromosome counts. (TTG)6 and 5S rDNA signals discerned several chromosomes located at subterminal or central regions. Based on the similarity of the signal pattern (mainly in number and location and less in intensity) of the four species, the variations in the 5S rDNA and (TTG)6 distribution can be ordered as L. lucidum < L. × vicaryi < F. pennsylvanica < S. oblata. Variations have observed in the three genera. The molecular cytogenetic data presented here might serve as a starting point for further larger-scale elucidation of the structure of the Oleaceae genome, and comparison with the known phylogeny of Oleaceae family.

scholarly journals Comparative Performance of Breast Cancer Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization and Brightfield In Situ Hybridization on College of American Pathologists Proficiency Tests

2018 ◽  
Vol 142 (10) ◽  
pp. 1254-1259 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katherine B. Geiersbach ◽  
Julia A. Bridge ◽  
Michelle Dolan ◽  
Lawrence J. Jennings ◽  
Diane L. Persons ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
In Situ Hybridization ◽  
Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization ◽  
Proficiency Testing ◽  
Copy Number ◽  
Fish Analysis ◽  
Proficiency Tests ◽  
Comparative Performance ◽  
Significant Difference

Context.— Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and brightfield in situ hybridization (ISH) are 2 clinically approved laboratory methods for detecting ERBB2 (HER2) amplification in breast cancer. Objective.— To compare the performance of FISH and brightfield ISH on proficiency testing administered by the College of American Pathologists Laboratory Accreditation Program. Design.— Retrospective review was performed on 70 tissue core samples in 7 separate proficiency testing surveys conducted between 2009 and 2013. Results.— The samples included 13 consensus-amplified tissue cores, 53 consensus-nonamplified cores, and 4 cores that did not reach consensus for FISH and/or brightfield ISH. There were 2552 individual responses for FISH and 1871 individual responses for brightfield ISH. Consensus response rates were comparable for FISH (2474 of 2524; 98.0%) and brightfield ISH (2135 of 2189; 97.5%). The FISH analysis yielded an average HER2 copy number per cell that was significantly higher (by 2.86; P = .02) compared with brightfield ISH for amplified cores. For nonamplified cores, FISH yielded slightly, but not significantly, higher (by 0.17; P = .10) HER2 copy numbers per cell. There was no significant difference in the average HER2 to control ratio for either consensus-amplified or consensus-nonamplified cores. Participants reported “unable to analyze” more frequently for brightfield ISH (244 of 2453; 9.9%) than they did for FISH (160 of 2684; 6.0%). Conclusions.— Our study indicates a high concordance rate in proficiency testing surveys, with some significant differences noted in the technical performance of these assays. In borderline cases, updated American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists cutoff thresholds that place greater emphasis on HER2 copy number per cell could accentuate those differences between FISH and brightfield ISH.

scholarly journals Dedifferentiated Liposarcoma Arising in an Esophageal Polyp: A Case Report

2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-3 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jorge Torres-Mora ◽  
Ann Moyer ◽  
Mark Topazian ◽  
Jeffrey Alexander ◽  
Tsung-Teh Wu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
In Situ Hybridization ◽  
Case Report ◽  
Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization ◽  
Gene Amplification ◽  
Dedifferentiated Liposarcoma ◽  
Well Differentiated

Liposarcoma is one of the most common sarcomas in adults, but only rarely presents as an esophageal primary. There have been several reports of well-differentiated liposarcoma (WDL) arising in the esophagus, but we present a case of dedifferentiated liposarcoma (DL) presenting as a large esophageal polyp. We believe this is the first reported case of DL of the esophagus with morphologic evidence of both well-differentiated and dedifferentiated components. The diagnosis was confirmed by demonstration of CPM gene amplification by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH).

566 FLUORESCENCE IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION (FISH) ANALYSIS FOR THE DIAGNOSIS OF HCC

2010 ◽  
Vol 52 ◽  
pp. S225
Author(s):  
J. Lorber ◽  
H. Kreipe ◽  
B. Schlegelberger ◽  
M.P. Manns ◽  
B. Skawran ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
In Situ Hybridization ◽  
Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization ◽  
Fish Analysis
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document