scholarly journals Does the Use of Injectable Atelocollagen during Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair Improve Clinical and Structural Outcomes?

2019 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 183-189
Author(s):  
In Bo Kim ◽  
Eun Yeol Kim ◽  
Kuk Pil Lim ◽  
Ki Seong Heo
Keyword(s):  
Rotator Cuff ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Rotator Cuff Repair ◽  
Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair ◽  
Rotator Cuff Tears ◽  
Group I ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group Ii ◽  
Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff ◽  
Cuff Repair

Background: Since the establishment of biological augmentation to improve the treatment of rotator cuff tears, it is imperative to explore newer techniques to reduce the retear rate and improve long-term shoulder function after rotator cuff repair. This study was undertaken to determine the consequences of a gel-type atelocollagen injection during arthroscopic rotator cuff repair on clinical outcomes, and evaluate its effect on structural integrity.Methods: Between January 2014 and June 2015, 121 patients with full thickness rotator cuff tears underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Of these, 61 patients were subjected to arthroscopic rotator cuff repair in combination with an atelocollagen injection (group I), and 60 patients underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair alone (group II). The visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain and the Korean Shoulder Society (KSS) scores were evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed at 6 months postoperatively, to assess the integrity of the repair.Results: VAS scores were significantly lower in group I than in group II at 3, 7, and 14 days after surgery. KSS scores showed no significant difference between groups in the 24 months period of follow-up. No significant difference was obtained in the healing rate of the rotator cuff tear at 6 months postoperatively (<i>p</i>=0.529).Conclusions: Although a gel-type atelocollagen injection results in reduced pain in patients at 2 weeks after surgery, our study does not substantiate the administration of atelocollagen during rotator cuff repair to improve the clinical outcomes and healing of the rotator cuff.

scholarly journals Bilateral single-staged arthroscopic rotator cuff repair is comparable to staged procedures: a retrospective follow up study of 2 years

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Chen Wang ◽  
Pu Yang ◽  
Dongfang Zhang ◽  
In-Ho Jeon ◽  
Tengbo Yu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rotator Cuff ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Rotator Cuff Repair ◽  
Single Stage ◽  
Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Outcome Scores ◽  
Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff ◽  
Cuff Repair

Abstract Background Bilateral rotator cuff tears are not uncommon and the timing of the surgical treatment of both shoulders is debated. In the present study, we aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of patients who underwent single-stage or staged bilateral arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Methods From March 2013 to May 2018, a retrospective review on all patients who underwent bilateral arthroscopic rotator cuff repair at our department was performed. Patients were separated into 2 groups: single-stage and staged. The minimum follow-up period was 2 years. The visual analog scale (VAS), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) score, Constant-Murley (Constant) score, the range of motion (ROM) of the shoulder and the hospitalization costs were evaluated for comparison between the two groups before and after the operation. Differences between groups were assessed using t-tests and ANOVA. Results All 51 patients completed follow-up of 2 years, single stage (n = 24) and staged group (n = 27). There was no significant difference in the VAS, ASES, UCLA and Constant scores between the single-stage group and the staged group before the operation. Postoperative clinical scores were significantly improved in both groups (P < 0.05). All outcome scores were significantly different between the two groups at 6 months postoperatively, and the staged scored better than the single-stage (P < 0.05). At 12, 18, and 24 months after the operation, the outcome scores were not significantly different between the two groups. At follow-up, the ROM of the shoulder was not significantly different between the two groups. In the single-stage group, the outcome scores and ROM were similar for both shoulders and comparable to the staged group. We also found significant cost savings in the single-stage group (4440.89 ± 130.55 USD) compared to the staged group (5065.73 ± 254.76 USD) (p < 0.05). Conclusions Patients receiving single-stage or staged bilateral arthroscopic rotator cuff repair showed similarly good clinical outcomes at follow-ups longer than 6 months. Moreover, good outcomes were observed on both sides of the single-stage group.

scholarly journals Treatment of Large and Massive Rotator Cuff Tears: Does Infraspinatus Muscle Tear Affect Repair Integrity?

2019 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 203-209
Author(s):  
Sungwook Choi ◽  
Hyunchul Yang ◽  
Hyunseong Kang ◽  
Gyeong Min Kim
Keyword(s):  
Rotator Cuff ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Rotator Cuff Repair ◽  
Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair ◽  
Rotator Cuff Tears ◽  
Massive Rotator Cuff Tears ◽  
Infraspinatus Muscle ◽  
Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff ◽  
Cuff Repair

Background: Clinical outcomes and prognosis of large and massive rotator cuff tears are known to be unpredictable not only in degeneration of the rotator cuff, but also due to a high rate of retear.Methods: Totally, 81 patients who had undergone arthroscopic rotator cuff repair from May 2008 to February 2016 were evaluated in our study. Clinical and functional evaluations were performed with the Constant score and the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) score, as well as full physical examination of the shoulder. All patients were confirmed to have magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of tendon healing at least 1 year postoperatively.Results: The average age at the time of surgery was 65 years (range, 47?78 years). The average duration of postoperative time in which a follow-up MRI was performed was 36.1 months (range, 12?110 months). Large tears were present in 48 cases (59.3%) and massive tears in 33 cases (40.7%). Overall, there were 33 retear cases (40.7%). All the average clinical outcome scores were significantly improved at the last follow-up (<i>p</i><0.001), although repair integrity was not maintained. Compared to type A, types C, and D of the Collin’s classification showed significantly higher retear rates (<i>p</i>=0.036).Conclusions: Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair yields improved clinical outcomes and a relatively high degree of patient satisfaction, despite the repair integrity not being maintained. Involvement of the subscapularis muscle or infraspinatus muscle had no effect on the retear rate.

Factors Predictive of Healing in Large Rotator Cuff Tears: Is It Possible to Predict Retear Preoperatively?

2018 ◽  
Vol 46 (7) ◽  
pp. 1693-1700 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ho Yeon Jeong ◽  
Hwan Jin Kim ◽  
Yoon Sang Jeon ◽  
Yong Girl Rhee
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Multivariate Analysis ◽  
Rotator Cuff ◽  
Rotator Cuff Repair ◽  
Fatty Infiltration ◽  
Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair ◽  
Rotator Cuff Tears ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff ◽  
Cuff Repair

Background: Many studies have identified risk factors that cause retear after rotator cuff repair. However, it is still questionable whether retears can be predicted preoperatively. Purpose: To determine the risk factors related to retear after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair and to evaluate whether it is possible to predict the occurrence of retear preoperatively. Study Design: Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: This study enrolled 112 patients who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with single-row technique for a large-sized tear, defined as a tear with a mediolateral length of 3 to 5 cm. All patients underwent routine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at 9 months postoperatively to assess tendon integrity. The sample included 61 patients (54.5%) in the healed group and 51 (45.5%) in the retear group. Results: In multivariate analysis, the independent predictors of retears were supraspinatus muscle atrophy ( P < .001) and fatty infiltration of the infraspinatus ( P = .027), which could be preoperatively measured by MRI. A significant difference was found between the two groups in sex, the acromiohumeral interval, tendon tension, and preoperative or intraoperative mediolateral tear length and musculotendinous junction position in univariate analysis. However, these variables were not independent predictors in multivariate analysis. The cutoff values of occupation ratio of supraspinatus and fatty infiltration of the infraspinatus were 43% and grade 2, respectively. The occupation ratio of supraspinatus <43% and grade ≥2 fatty infiltration of the infraspinatus were the strongest predictors of retear, with an area under the curve of 0.908, sensitivity of 98.0%, and specificity of 83.6% (accuracy = 90.2%). Conclusion: In patients with large rotator cuff tears, it was possible to predict the retear before rotator cuff repair regardless of intraoperative factors. The retear could be predicted most effectively when the occupation ratio of supraspinatus was <43% or the fatty infiltration of infraspinatus was grade ≥2. Predicting retear preoperatively may help surgeons determine proper treatment and predict the postoperative prognosis.

Effects of Anxiety and Depression Measured via the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale on Early Pain and Range of Motion After Rotator Cuff Repair

2021 ◽  
Vol 49 (2) ◽  
pp. 314-320
Author(s):  
Joo Hyun Park ◽  
Sung-Min Rhee ◽  
Hyong Suk Kim ◽  
Joo Han Oh
Keyword(s):  
Rotator Cuff ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Rotator Cuff Repair ◽  
Preoperative Anxiety ◽  
Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair ◽  
Psychological Status ◽  
Anxiety And Depression ◽  
Group B ◽  
Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff ◽  
Cuff Repair

Background: Preoperative anxiety and depression are independent predictors of clinical outcomes after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. However, few studies have evaluated correlations between outcomes such as pain and range of motion (ROM) after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair and preoperative anxiety and depression. Purpose: To evaluate the effects of preoperative anxiety and depression, measured using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), on early pain and ROM after rotator cuff repair. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. Methods: A total of 144 consecutive patients who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair were enrolled and divided into 2 groups according to HADS scores: group A, those with a healthy psychological status (n = 103; anxiety ≤7 and depression ≤7), and group B, those with psychological distress (n = 41; anxiety ≥8 or depression ≥8). Clinical outcomes were assessed using the visual analog scale for pain (pVAS) and ROM at 3 and 6 months postoperatively and annually. Results: There were no significant preoperative differences in age, sex, tear size, pVAS scores, and ROM. However, at 3 months postoperatively, group A showed significantly lower mean pVAS scores (2.2 ± 1.3 vs 3.4 ± 1.8, respectively; P = .001) and significantly higher mean forward flexion (146.4°± 23.0° vs 124.1°± 28.2°, respectively; P < .001) than group B, as well as significantly higher mean levels of internal rotation at the back (T11.5 ± 2.8 vs L1.9 ± 2.5, respectively; P < .001) and significantly higher mean external rotation (42.4°± 15.9° vs 35.2°± 16.8°, respectively; P = .019). At 6 months postoperatively, the mean pVAS score was still significantly lower in group A than in group B (0.8 ± 1.6 vs 1.8 ± 2.1, respectively; P = .016), but other ROM measurements had no significant differences. There was also no significant difference in clinical and functional outcomes at the final follow-up. Conclusion: Anxiety and depression negatively affected clinical outcomes after rotator cuff repair. Recovery from pain and of ROM after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair occurred more quickly in patients with a healthy psychological status. Therefore, assessments of preoperative psychological status should be emphasized to improve early clinical outcomes after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.

Delamination Does Not Affect Outcomes After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair as Compared With Nondelaminated Rotator Cuff Tears: A Study of 1043 Consecutive Cases

2019 ◽  
Vol 47 (3) ◽  
pp. 674-681 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jieun Kwon ◽  
Ye Hyun Lee ◽  
Sae Hoon Kim ◽  
Jung Hoon Ko ◽  
Byung Kyu Park ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prognostic Factor ◽  
Rotator Cuff ◽  
Rotator Cuff Repair ◽  
Fatty Infiltration ◽  
Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair ◽  
Rotator Cuff Tears ◽  
Symptom Duration ◽  
Negative Prognostic Factor ◽  
Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff ◽  
Cuff Repair

Background: Limited information is available regarding the characteristics of delaminated rotator cuff tears as compared with nondelaminated tears. Furthermore, there is conflicting information regarding the effects of delamination on the anatomic healing of repaired cuffs. Purpose: To evaluate the characteristics and anatomic outcomes of delaminated rotator cuff tears in comparison with nondelaminated tears to determine whether delamination is a negative prognostic factor affecting rotator cuff repair outcomes. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Between 2010 and 2014, 1043 patients were enrolled in the study to assess the prevalence of delamination. Among them, the findings from 531 patients who underwent magnetic resonance imaging or computed tomographic arthrography at least 1 year after surgery were included to determine whether delamination was a negative prognostic factor affecting the anatomic outcomes of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Delamination was assessed intraoperatively and defined by distinguishable edge cleavage tearing or interstitial horizontal gap between the articular and bursal surfaces of the torn tendon. One of 3 repair techniques (modified Mason Allen, single row, or double row) was used according to tear configuration and tendon mobilization. The authors evaluated visual analog scale scores for pain and satisfaction and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores to quantify clinical outcomes. Results: The incidence of delamination was 42.9% (447 of 1043). As compared with those with nondelaminated tears, patients with delaminated tears were older ( P < .001) and had longer symptom duration ( P = .019), larger tear sizes and retractions ( P < .001 for both), higher grades of fatty infiltration of the rotator cuff muscles (all P < .001), and poorer tendon quality ( P < .001). The overall healing failure rate was 19.0% (101 of 531). In univariate analysis, the rate of healing failure for the repaired cuffs was significantly higher in the delaminated group (delaminated tears, 60 of 238, 25.2%; nondelaminated tears, 41 of 293, 14.0%; P = .001). However, results of subgroup and multivariate analyses showed that the presence of delamination was ultimately not an independent risk factor for the failure of cuff healing. Between the delaminated and nondelaminated groups, there was no significant difference in postoperative functional outcomes. Conclusion: The results suggest that delaminated rotator cuff tears might represent chronic degenerative tears of longer symptom duration, with larger tear sizes and higher grades of fatty infiltration in older patients. It appears that delamination could be a confounding factor, not an independent prognostic factor, affecting rotator cuff healing.

scholarly journals The Incidence of Chronic Opioid Use Following Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair and Patient Opioid Education

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (7_suppl5) ◽  
pp. 2325967119S0025
Author(s):  
Danielle G. Weekes ◽  
Jenna A. Feldman ◽  
Richard E. Campbell ◽  
Michael DeFrance ◽  
Fotios P. Tjoumakaris ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rotator Cuff ◽  
Rotator Cuff Repair ◽  
Shoulder Function ◽  
Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair ◽  
Prescription Data ◽  
Opioid Use ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Chronic Opioid Use ◽  
Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff ◽  
Cuff Repair

Objectives: Opioids are commonly prescribed for pain management following Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair (ARCR). While their efficacy outweighs their risks in the short term, chronic opioid use is associated with significant adverse effects, such as dependence, endocrine imbalance or respiratory depression. The rate of chronic opioid use and dependence following ARCR is unknown. The purpose of this study is to determine the rate of chronic opioid use following ARCR and establish the effect of preoperative opioid education on reducing chronic consumption. A secondary aim is to determine if any correlation exists between chronic opioid use and shoulder functionality. Methods: A prospective, randomized study of 140 patients undergoing ARCR was performed with a minimum follow-up of 24 months. Patients were randomized to receive preoperative opioid education (risks of abuse, dependence, etc.) or no education. State registry database opioid prescription data monitoring software were utilized to search for all opioid prescriptions following ARCR in our patient population and this was compared to our electronic medical database for accuracy/discrepancy. The total number of opioid prescriptions and number of tablets was determined as well as time from surgery to most recent prescription. Patients were contacted to determine a shoulder Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) score and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain score. Categorical data was analyzed via chi-squared tests as appropriate. Numeric data was analyzed using t-tests as appropriate. Results: Forty-five patients (32%) continued to fill opioid prescriptions chronically following ARCR. Seventeen (38%) of these patents received pre-operative opioid educated, whereas twenty-eight (62%) did not (p=0.05). Sixty percent of patients with a history of pre-operative opioid use continued to take opioids, while 23% of opioid naive patients continued (p< 0.01). There was no significant difference in SANE (p= 0.53) or VAS (p= 0.65) scores between the education and control group. Patients taking opioids prior to surgery had worse SANE scores (71.28) than the non-users (86.28), p< 0.01. Conclusion: Almost a third of patients will chronically use opioids following ARCR, including 23% of opioid naive patients. Preoperative opioid use is strongly associated with chronic opioid utilization, as well as decreased shoulder function 2 years after ARCR. Preoperative opioid education significantly decreased the rate of chronic opioid use; however, there is no effect on long-term shoulder function. [Table: see text]

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document