scholarly journals TWO CASES OF PANCREATIC ABSCESS ASSOCIATED WITH PENETRATION TO THE GASTROINTESTINAL TRACT DURING TREATMENT USING ENDOSCOPIC ULTRASOUND-GUIDED DRAINAGE

2007 ◽  
Vol 53 (1) ◽  
pp. 39-49 ◽  
Author(s):  
HIDEMICHI IMAMURA ◽  
ATSUSHI IRISAWA ◽  
TADAYUKI TAKAGI ◽  
GORO SHIBUKAWA ◽  
TAKERU WAKATSUKI ◽  
...  
2017 ◽  
Vol 05 (03) ◽  
pp. E165-E171 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christoph Schlag ◽  
Christoph Menzel ◽  
Manuela Götzberger ◽  
Simon Nennstiel ◽  
Peter Klare ◽  
...  

Abstract Background and study aims The optimal approach to small subepithelial tumors (SETs) of the upper gastrointestinal tract remains inconclusive. The aim of this study was to evaluate endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) for less invasive tissue sampling of small SETs of the upper gastrointestinal tract. Patients and methods In this prospective observational study patients with small ( ≤ 3 cm) SETs of the upper gastrointestinal tract were eligible and underwent EUS-FNB with a 22-gauge core biopsy needle. The main outcome measure was the diagnostic yield. The number of obtained core biopsies was also assessed. Results Twenty patients were included. The mean SET size was 16 mm (range 10 – 27 mm). EUS-FNB was technically feasible in all cases and no complications were observed. The diagnostic yield was 75 %. Core biopsy specimens were obtained in only 25 % of cases. Conclusion EUS-FNB with a 22-gauge core biopsy needle of small SETs can achieve a definite diagnosis in the majority of cases. However, because core samples cannot regularly be obtained, EUS-FNB seems not to be convincingly superior to standard EUS-FNA in this setting


2020 ◽  
Vol 08 (10) ◽  
pp. E1359-E1364
Author(s):  
Takafumi Mie ◽  
Takashi Sasaki ◽  
Ryo Kanata ◽  
Takaaki Furukawa ◽  
Tsuyoshi Takeda ◽  
...  

Abstract Background and study aims Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided tissue acquisition is sometimes required to diagnose small solid pancreatic lesions. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic yield of EUS-guided tissue acquisition for small solid pancreatic lesions and the differences in diagnostic yield among different needles. Patients and method We retrospectively analyzed consecutive patients who had undergone EUS-guided tissue acquisition for solid pancreatic lesions less than 2 cm between November 2012 and June 2019. Three types of needles were evaluated in this study: a 22-gauge fine-needle aspiration (FNA) Lancet needle, a 20-gauge fine-needle biopsy (FNB) Menghini needle with a lateral forward bevel, and a 22-gauge FNB Franseen needle. We evaluated the diagnostic yield and safety of the procedure using these needles. Results We analyzed 160 patients with 163 lesions. The overall sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 92.0 %, 100 %, and 92.6 %, respectively. In the histological plus cytological diagnosis, accuracies of the Lancet, Menghini, and Franseen needles were 92.7 %, 97.0 %, and 85.7 %, respectively (P = 0.10). In the histological diagnosis alone, the negative predictive values (NPVs) of the Lancet, Menghini, and Franseen needles were 13.3 %, 53.3 %, and 27.3 %, respectively (P = 0.08). Adverse events occurred in four cases (2.5 %): one postprocedural bleeding, two cases of pancreatitis, and one pancreatic abscess. Conclusions EUS-guided tissue acquisition for small solid pancreatic lesions has a high diagnostic yield and safety. This study suggested a difference in the diagnostic yield of each needle for small solid pancreatic lesions.


Endoscopy ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 43 (S 03) ◽  
Author(s):  
Chu Yin-Yi ◽  
Lin Cheng-Hui ◽  
Ng Soh-Ching ◽  
Sung Kai-Feng ◽  
Lien Jau-Min ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document