On the Mechanisms for Low-Sulfide, High-Platinum Group Element and High-Sulfide, Low-Platinum Group Element Mineralization in the Eastern Gabbro, Coldwell Complex, Canada: Evidence from Textural Associations, S/Se Values, and Platinum Group Element Concentrations of Base Metal Sulfides

2020 ◽  
Vol 115 (2) ◽  
pp. 355-384
Author(s):  
M. J. Brzozowski ◽  
I. M. Samson ◽  
J. E. Gagnon ◽  
D. J. Good ◽  
R. L. Linnen
Keyword(s):  
Base Metal ◽  
Platinum Group Element ◽  
Metal Sulfide ◽  
Group Element ◽  
Pge Mineralization ◽  
Base Metal Sulfides ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Platinum Group ◽  
Compositional Variations ◽  
R Factors

Abstract The Eastern Gabbro, Coldwell Complex, hosts several geochemically and mineralogically distinct Cu-platinum group element (PGE) deposits, including the high-grade W Horizon (>100 ppm Pd-Pt-Au over 2 m). Several magmatic and/or hydrothermal models have previously been proposed to explain the range of enrichment in PGEs observed in the Marathon deposit, but no work has integrated textural and compositional variations in sulfides to elucidate which of these models is most suitable. Additionally, comparatively little work has been done to characterize the genesis of Cu-PGE mineralization that occurs to the northwest of the Marathon deposit in the Eastern Gabbro. Through integration of base metal sulfide (BMS) mineralogy, texture, and trace element chemistry, a wide range of magmatic and postmagmatic processes have been characterized that contributed to the formation of these deposits. In all zones of mineralization in the Eastern Gabbro, chalcophile elements were remobilized from primary chalcopyrite by hydrothermal fluids and precipitated as secondary chalcopyrite, which occurs as a replacement of pyrrhotite and as intergrowths with hydrous silicates. BMSs in the mineralized zones in the Marathon deposit (Footwall zone, Main zone, and W Horizon) experienced higher R factors than those deposits located northwest of the Marathon deposit (Four Dams, Area 41, and Redstone), with BMSs in the W Horizon having experienced the highest R factors. The silicate melts from which the Footwall zone crystallized likely experienced some degree of sulfide segregation at depth, albeit to a much lesser degree than the northern deposits. Additionally, the melts from which the mineralized zones in the Marathon deposit crystallized were likely contaminated by high-S/Se Archean sedimentary rocks, whereas the northern deposits were likely contaminated by low-S/Se igneous and/or metamorphic rocks. BMSs in a chalcopyrite-rich pod located within the vicinity of the Coldwell Complex experienced both high R factors and high degrees of contamination (cf. W Horizon and Footwall zone, respectively). This study illustrates the complexity of processes that generate and modify mineralization in conduit-type Ni-Cu-PGE systems.

The effects of post-cumulus alteration on the distribution of chalcophile elements in magmatic sulfide deposits and implications for the formation of low-S-high-PGE zones: The Luanga deposit, Carajás Mineral Province, Brazil

2021 ◽  
Vol 59 (6) ◽  
pp. 1453-1484
Author(s):  
Eduardo Mansur ◽  
Sarah-Jane Barnes ◽  
Cesar F. Ferreira Filho
Keyword(s):  
Base Metal ◽  
Platinum Group Element ◽  
Platinum Group Elements ◽  
Group Element ◽  
Metal Sulfides ◽  
Chalcophile Elements ◽  
Platinum Group Minerals ◽  
Base Metal Sulfides ◽  
Magmatic Sulfide ◽  
Platinum Group

ABSTRACT Most of the World's platinum-group element ore deposits occur as thin stratiform layers within layered intrusions. These layers generally contain disseminated base-metal sulfides or chromite. However, cryptic platinum-group element deposits also occur without chromite or base-metal sulfides in what are known as low-S-high platinum-group element deposits. The origin of these deposits is not clearly understood. The Luanga Complex hosts the largest platinum-group elements resource in South America (i.e., 142 Mt at 1.24 ppm Pt + Pd + Au and 0.11% Ni) and hosts both a platinum-group element deposit containing disseminated base-metal sulfides (style 1) and a low-S-high platinum-group element deposit (style 2). It therefore offers the opportunity to compare the two deposit types in the same overall geological setting and consider how the low-S-high platinum-group element deposit could have formed. The first deposit style is termed the Sulfide zone and consists of a 10–50 meter-thick interval with disseminated base metal sulfides, whereas the second style is named low-S-high-Pt-Pd zone and consists of 2–10 meter-thick discontinuous lenses of 1–5 meter-thick sulfide- and oxide-free harzburgite and orthopyroxenite with discrete platinum-group minerals. Secondary assemblages commonly replace primary igneous minerals to a variable extent throughout the deposit, and thus allow for investigating the effects of post-cumulus alteration on the distribution of a wide range of chalcophile elements in a magmatic sulfide deposit at both whole-rock and mineral scale. This study presents the whole-rock distribution of S, platinum-group elements, and Te, As, Bi, Sb, and Se in both mineralization styles and the concentration of trace elements in base-metal sulfides from the Sulfide zone. The Sulfide zone has Pt/Pd ratios around 0.5 and high concentrations of Te, As, Bi, Sb, and Se, whereas the low-S-high-platinum-group element zone has Pt/Pd ratios greater than 1 and much lower Se, Te, and Bi concentrations, but comparable As and Sb contents. This is reflected in the platinum-group element assemblage, comprising bismuthotellurides in the Sulfide zone and mostly arsenides and antimonides in the low-S, high platinum-group elements zone. Moreover, the base-metal sulfides from the Sulfide zone have anomalously high As contents (50–500 ppm), which suggest that the sulfide liquid segregated from a very As-rich silicate magma, possibly illustrated by an average komatiitic basalt that assimilated a mixture of upper continental crust and black shales. We interpret the low-S-high platinum-group elements zone as a product of S loss from magmatic sulfides during post-cumulus alteration of the Luanga Complex. Selenium, Te, Bi, and Pd were also lost together with S, whereas As and Sb were expelled from base-metal sulfide structures and combined with platinum-group elements to form platinum-group minerals, suggesting they may play a role fixating platinum-group elements during alteration. The remobilization of chalcophile elements from magmatic sulfide deposits located in the Carajás Mineral Province may represent a potential source for hydrothermal deposits found in the region.

The influence of country-rock assimilation and silicate to sulfide ratios (R factor) on the genesis of the Dunka Road Cu – Ni – platinum-group element deposit, Duluth Complex, Minnesota

1997 ◽  
Vol 34 (4) ◽  
pp. 375-389 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert D. Thériault ◽  
Sarah-Jane Barnes ◽  
Mark J. Severson
Keyword(s):  
Platinum Group Element ◽  
Country Rock ◽  
Metal Sulfide ◽  
Parental Magma ◽  
Group Element ◽  
Duluth Complex ◽  
Metasedimentary Rocks ◽  
R Factor ◽  
Platinum Group ◽  
R Factors

The Dunka Road deposit is one of several Cu – Ni – platinum-group element (PGE) sulfide occurrences found along the northwestern margin of the Duluth Complex, where the host troctolitic rocks are in contact with metasedimentary rocks of the Animikie Group. Magma contamination through assimilation of sulfidic argillaceous country rocks is generally recognized as having played a key role in the genesis of the mineralization. Three main types of disseminated sulfide mineralization have been identified within the Dunka Road deposit: (i) norite-hosted sulfides, (ii) troctolite-hosted sulfides, and (iii) PGE-rich sulfide horizons. The norite-hosted sulfides are found either adjacent to country-rock xenoliths or near the basal contact. The troctolite-hosted sulfides form the bulk of the deposit, and occur throughout the lower 250 m of the intrusion. The PGE-rich sulfide horizons are typically localized directly beneath ultramafic layers. The composition of the different types of sulfide occurrences is modelled using Cu/Pd ratios. It is shown that each type results from the interplay of two main parameters, namely the degree of magma contamination and the silicate magma to sulfide melt ratio (R factor). The norite-hosted sulfides formed at low R factors and high degrees of contamination, as expressed by their PGE-depleted nature, low Se/S ratios, and elevated content in pyrrhotite and arsenide minerals. The troctolite-hosted sulfides formed at moderate R factors and small degrees of contamination, as shown by their moderate PGE content and mantle-like Se/S ratios. Finally, the PGE-rich sulfide horizons are modelled using elevated R factors from an uncontaminated parental magma, which is substantiated by their elevated noble metal content and Se/S ratios, and low pyrrhotite to precious metal sulfide ratio.

Magnetic signature of magnetite‐enriched rocks hosting platinum‐group element mineralization within the Archean Boston Creek Flow, Ontario

Geophysics ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 63 (2) ◽  
pp. 440-445 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michelle S. Larson ◽  
William E. Stone ◽  
William A. Morris ◽  
James H. Crocket
Keyword(s):  
Platinum Group Element ◽  
Magnetic Anomalies ◽  
Ore Deposits ◽  
Group Element ◽  
Rock Types ◽  
Platinum Group Minerals ◽  
Pge Mineralization ◽  
Geophysical Surveys ◽  
Close Proximity ◽  
Platinum Group

Ground‐based magnetometer surveys detect high‐positive magnetic anomalies (up to 72 000 nT) which coincide with the location of subeconomic, magnetite‐associated platinum‐group element (PGE) mineralization within the Boston Creek Flow iron‐rich basalt, Archean Abitibi Greenstone Belt, Ontario. The magnetic anomalies confirm the presence of magnetite‐enriched zones (up to 20 modal%), and reveal that they are ovoid in shape, up to 10 m in size, and along strike from each other in the central gabbro‐diorite layer. Geological and geochemical surveys and mineralogical studies indicate that these zones host smaller zones of disseminated chalcopyrite + pyrite, some of which, in turn, host platinum‐group minerals (PGM) and are enriched in PGE and related metals (whole‐rock [Formula: see text], Ag = 1300 ppb, Cu = 0.3%, V = 0.1%, Ni = 0.05%, Ti = 2.5%, and Fe = 25%). The coincidence of the high‐positive magnetic anomalies with the location of PGE mineralization, points to ground‐based magnetometer surveys as a valuable exploration tool for magnetite‐associated PGE ore deposits. The distribution of the residual magnetic field anomalies indicate that such surveys are especially useful in: (1) identifying rock types and mapping their distribution in areas of limited outcrop exposure; (2) locating magnetite‐enriched gabbroic rock bodies, even in close proximity to serpentinized olivine cumulate rocks; and (3) delineating the detailed geometry of magnetite‐enriched rocks that may carry significant amounts of PGE and PGMs. Exploration strategies should be designed to use ground‐based geophysical surveys, in conjunction with geological and geochemical surveys, to locate and delineate the geometry of magnetite‐enriched zones within thick, differentiated mafic‐ultramafic volcanic flows and plutonic bodies.

Multiple S Isotopes and S Isotope Heterogeneity at the East Eagle Ni-Cu-Platinum Group Element Deposit, Northern Michigan

2020 ◽  
Vol 115 (3) ◽  
pp. 527-541
Author(s):  
E.K. Benson ◽  
E.M. Ripley ◽  
C. Li ◽  
B.W. Underwood ◽  
R. Mahin
Keyword(s):  
Platinum Group Element ◽  
Group Element ◽  
Spatial Proximity ◽  
Small Scale ◽  
Sulfide Mineralization ◽  
Exchange Reactions ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Platinum Group ◽  
Northern Michigan ◽  
S Isotope

Abstract The East Eagle Ni-Cu-platinum group element deposit is a conduit-type deposit located in northern Michigan, in close spatial proximity to the currently producing Eagle deposit. Massive and semimassive (net-textured) sulfide mineralization at East Eagle occurs approximately 800 m lower in the stratigraphic sequence than that at Eagle and only ~200 m above the contact between Proterozoic and Archean rocks. Although sulfide mineralogy and textural types are similar at the two occurrences, there are important differences in their S isotope systematics. Massive sulfide mineralization at East Eagle is characterized by a relatively narrow range of δ34S values from 1.5 to 3.2‰. Semimassive sulfides show a similar range from 2.1 to 3.8‰. In strong contrast to these values, those from disseminated sulfides that border the massive and semimassive mineralization define a much larger range from –4.3 to 22.8‰. The much more restricted range in δ34S values recorded in the massive and semimassive sulfide mineralization compared to that of the disseminated mineralization is thought to reflect isotopic exchange reactions in the conduit involving accumulated sulfide and pulses of magma containing S of mantle origin. The ∆33S values of all three major types of sulfide mineralization at East Eagle are near 0‰, with most values between –0.03 and 0.03‰. Unlike ∆33S values from semimassive sulfide mineralization at Eagle, the ∆33S values at East Eagle show no, or very limited, evidence for the involvement of S derived from Archean sedimentary rocks. The wide range in δ34S values recorded in the disseminated mineralization provides strong evidence that S from Proterozoic sedimentary host rocks was involved in the mineralization; in some cases, as much as 85% of the S may have been of external origin. In addition to the wide range in δ34S values, the disseminated mineralization is characterized by spatially heterogeneous δ34S values. Meter-scale S isotope variations, as well as variations in Pt and Pd tenor, are consistent with multiple inputs of magma, each characterized by distinct S isotope ratios. Heterogeneity of several per mill at the centimeter scale indicates that the degree of supercooling exceeded the S diffusivity, preserving small-scale S isotope variability inherited from the sedimentary country-rock source. Elongate, branching plagioclase grains in many of the gabbroic rocks that host the disseminated sulfide mineralization are consistent with a rapid second stage of cooling.

scholarly journals Contact-style magmatic sulphide mineralisation in the Labrador Trough, northern Quebec, Canada: implications for regional prospectivity

2020 ◽  
Vol 57 (7) ◽  
pp. 867-883 ◽  
Author(s):  
W.D. Smith ◽  
W.D. Maier ◽  
I. Bliss
Keyword(s):  
Platinum Group Element ◽  
Group Element ◽  
Common Source ◽  
Upper Crust ◽  
Sulphide Ores ◽  
Sulphide Mineralisation ◽  
Platinum Group ◽  
R Factors ◽  
Pge Geochemistry

The Labrador Trough in northern Quebec is currently the focus of ongoing exploration for magmatic Ni-Cu-platinum group element (PGE) sulphide ores. This geological belt hosts voluminous basaltic sills and lavas of the Montagnais Sill Complex, which are locally emplaced among sulphidic metasedimentary country rocks. The recently discovered Idefix PGE-Cu prospect represents a stack of gabbroic sills that host stratiform patchy disseminated to net-textured sulphides (0.2–0.4 g/t PGE+Au) over a thickness of ∼20 m, for up to 7 km. In addition, globular sulphides occur at the base of the sill, adjacent to the metasedimentary floor rocks. Whole-rock and PGE geochemistry indicates that the sills share a common source and that the extracted magma underwent significant fractionation before emplacement in the upper crust. To develop the PGE-enriched ores, sulphide melt saturation was attained before final emplacement, peaking at R factors of ∼10 000. Globular sulphides entrained along the base of the sill ingested crustally derived arsenic and were ultimately preserved in the advancing chilled margin.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document