scholarly journals Migration Pathways for Frontline Care Workers in Australia and New Zealand: Front Doors, Side Doors, Back Doors and Trapdoors

Author(s):  
Joanna Howe ◽  
Sara Charlesworth ◽  
Deborah Brennan

This article examines the use of migration law and policy to address the labour needs of the care sector in two jurisdictions. New Zealand uses an Essential Skills visa to allow the direct entry of care workers on a temporary basis while Australia relies on a range of overseas born entrants including international students and working holiday makers, to meet labour supply challenges in the care sector and to supplement the local workforce, which includes many long-term permanent migrants. Changes to the work rights of working holiday makers, together with the introduction of a Designated Area Migration Agreement for Northern Australia and a Pacific Labour Scheme have created new opportunities for temporary entrants to work in care occupations but there is pressure on the Australian Government to open a dedicated temporary labour migration pathway for care workers. New Zealand’s revolving door of temporary migrant care workers and Australia’s de facto low skilled migration pathway both present regulatory challenges with regard to the protection of these workers in the labour market, their claims to citizenship and their opportunity to realise the ‘triple win’ promised in the temporary labour migration literature. The increasing reliance by Australia and New Zealand on temporary migrant care workers to meet the labour supply challenges in the sector also masks a range of other endemic employment relations problems in the sector (in particular, low pay) and may lead to a permanent demand for temporary migrant workers at the expense of local care workers.

Normative discussions of temporary labour migration have focused mostly on what social and political rights, if any, temporary migrant workers should have. This chapter focuses on a different set of potential entitlements: cultural rights. The question I am interested in is whether the cultural needs and preferences of temporary migrant workers should be accommodated or even supported by receiving states (note that ‘culture’ is construed broadly here so as to include religious needs and preferences). Specifically, I ask when, if ever, temporary migrant workers should have access to three kinds of cultural rights from a liberal perspective: (i) cultural exemptions from laws and working regulations; (ii) cultural subsidies; and (iii) cultural recognition. Asking this question is important not just to fill a lacuna in the literature on multiculturalism (most of which is concerned with the cultural entitlements of citizens), but also from a practical point of view, as many countries harbour large numbers of temporary migrant workers.


2015 ◽  
Vol 43 (2) ◽  
pp. 259-287 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joanna Howe ◽  
Alexander Reilly

This article examines whether Australia's regulatory settings for temporary migrant labour are working effectively and argues that a backdoor currently exists which permits the entry of low skilled migrant workers on visas which are not for a work purpose, namely the international student visa and the working holiday maker visa. We propose that an explicit visa pathway be created for low and semi-skilled workers so that the working conditions of these visa holders are more appropriately monitored and to enable Australia's temporary labour migration program to better meet skill shortages in the economy.


2018 ◽  
Vol 41 (10) ◽  
pp. 1176-1200 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shilpi Smita Panda ◽  
Nihar Ranjan Mishra

Purpose Seasonal labour migration is a common form of temporary migration where the work of the migrant labour depends on seasonal conditions and is performed only during that period of year. This paper aims to identify the factors and subfactors of temporary labour migration from the existing literature. Design/methodology/approach The paper is based on an extensive review of the literature on temporary labour migration. Studies done from 1990 to 2016 were considered for review. The literatures from research articles, book chapters, working papers, conference papers and field-based project reports from various disciplines, like economics, sociology, anthropology, psychology and management studies were reviewed for critically analysing various factors affecting seasonal labour migration. Findings A total of five key factors and 60 subfactors of temporary labour migration were documented from previous studies. The findings of the study are organized under five thematic segments: economic factors, social factors, environmental factors, policy-related factors and psychological factors New aspects of seasonal migration were identified such as “role of labour contractors ”, “inter-generational mobility”, “social networks”, “grassroot politics”, “migrant’s relationship with the agents”, “labour registration process”, “market intervention” and “civil society intervention” after consultation with the subject experts and field study. Research limitations/implications The paper restricts itself to include aspects of temporary labour migration. Only the factors and subfactors affecting temporary migration are taken into purview. Further the findings of the paper can be empirically tested to know the significance of each factor and subfactor. Practical implications The paper has implications for better understanding of the temporary labour migration process in different context by focussing extensively on the factors of migration. The factors identified can be empirically tested in regional and local context, which would provide effective insights for policy formulation for the welfare and protection of the migrant workers. Originality/value The paper fulfils an identified need to provide a holistic review for understanding and documenting various factors and subfactors that affect the process of temporary labour migration.


2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-4
Author(s):  
Christina Stringer

Disturbing accounts of exploitation in the hospitality industry recently reported in the media include: “Restaurant workers treated like modern-day slaves – judge” [1]; “Restaurant chain exploited, underpaid workers for years” [2]; “Christchurch restaurant to pay $70K for underpaying staff” [3]. Such headlines are not new. In December 2016, I released the findings from a research project entitled “Worker exploitation in New Zealand: A troubling landscape” [4] which I undertook for the Human Trafficking Research Coalition [5]. I interviewed 105 people, the majority of whom were migrant workers. What became quickly apparent was the vulnerability of workers in the hospitality industry, and, in particular, the food and beverage sector. Common amongst those I interviewed was the non-compliance by their employers with New Zealand employment law, including the Minimum Wage Act 1983 and the Holidays Act 2003. A number of interviewees were paid less than the minimum wage and/or for less hours than they had worked. For example, one temporary migrant typically worked 90 hours a week but was only paid for 45 hours. Another worked 80 hours a week earning just $350 to $450 a week ($4.37 to $5.62 an hour). Staff in one Auckland restaurant, located in an upscale suburb, were not paid for two weeks as they were told there was no money to pay them. For some, their legal entitlements to holiday or sick pay were denied. In some cases, workers were paid their legal entitlements through the formal wage system but had to return part of their wages back in cash. Others paid potential employers $20,000 to $40,000 in order to secure a job with the prospect of obtaining permanent residency (PR). One interviewee had a good job albeit one without the prospect of permanent residency. He was offered employment in a restaurant with the promise of support for his PR application. There he worked 80 hours a week, often for little or no pay. Eight months later his employer told him he would not support his visa application. A number of interviewees felt their employers took advantage of their vulnerability, stating that “they know your weaknesses” including their inability to obtain other employment as their working visa was linked to their employer. In some cases, employers threatened the workers that they would be deported if they complained. In April 2017, a new policy came into effect whereby employers who are found to have exploited migrant workers face a compulsory stand-down period in terms of hiring. In May 2018, 106 employers were listed on the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment’s stand down list, including some from the hospitality sector. The hospitality sector is a significant employer of temporary migrant workers, particularly those on working holiday or student visas. The contributions that migrant workers make to this sector must be valued and their entitlement to New Zealand employment conditions respected. The original report that this article is based on can be accessed here https://www.workerexploitation.com/report  Corresponding author Christina Stringer can be contacted at [email protected] References (1) Tupou, L. Restaurant Workers Treated Like Modern Day Slaves – Judge. Radio NZ, 8 February 2018, https://www.radionz.co.nz/news/national/349948/restaurant-workers-treated-like-modern-day-slaves-judge (accessed Jun 11, 2018) (2) Restaurant Chain Exploited, Underpaid Workers for Years. Radio NZ, 16 March 2018. https://www.radionz.co.nz/news/national/352684/restaurant-chain-exploited-underpaid-workers-for-years (accessed Jun 11, 2018) (3) Christchurch Restaurant to Pay $70K Fine for Underpaying Staff. NZ Herald, 20 April 2018, https://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?c_id=3&objectid=12036338 (accessed Jun 11, 2018) (4) Stringer, S. Worker Exploitation in New Zealand: A Troubling Landscape, 2016. Report prepared for the Human Trafficking Research Coalition. www.workerexploitation.co.nz (accessed Jun 11, 2018) (5) Human Trafficking Research Coalition (members: The Préscha Initiative, Stand against Slavery, Hagar, and ECPAT –End Child Prostitution and Trafficking). https://e2nz.org/tag/human-trafficking-research-coalition/ (accessed Jun 11, 2018)


2017 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 274-300
Author(s):  
Emily J. Elliott

This article examines temporary labour migration to Moscow from 1971 to 1991, paying particular attention to relationships between state actors and young migrant workers. State officials not only provided young workers with housing and educational opportunities but also fostered Soviet socialist values among the young workers. The policies of Glasnost and Perestroika altered this relationship since state policies shifted towards embracing neoliberal practices. Such practices diminished social security for young migrants, leaving this once important social group vulnerable in a time of economic uncertainty.


2017 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
pp. 67-74
Author(s):  
G. V. Yakshibaeva

The problem of providing the most efficient and rational selection, distribution, use of migrant workers, with regard to both internal and external migration in close relation to socio-economic and demographic interests of the state are currently of particular relevance. Scientific novelty of work consists in the identification of factors and directions of flows as departing and arriving labor migrants in the Republic of Bashkortostan, the characteristics of the development of labour migration and its impact on employment, which allowed to identify problems and negative trends.


Genes ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 254
Author(s):  
Michel-Edwar Mickael ◽  
Norwin Kubick ◽  
Pavel Klimovich ◽  
Patrick Henckell Flournoy ◽  
Irmina Bieńkowska ◽  
...  

Infiltration of the endothelial layer of the blood-brain barrier by leukocytes plays a critical role in health and disease. When passing through the endothelial layer during the diapedesis process lymphocytes can either follow a paracellular route or a transcellular one. There is a debate whether these two processes constitute one mechanism, or they form two evolutionary distinct migration pathways. We used artificial intelligence, phylogenetic analysis, HH search, ancestor sequence reconstruction to investigate further this intriguing question. We found that the two systems share several ancient components, such as RhoA protein that plays a critical role in controlling actin movement in both mechanisms. However, some of the key components differ between these two transmigration processes. CAV1 genes emerged during Trichoplax adhaerens, and it was only reported in transcellular process. Paracellular process is dependent on PECAM1. PECAM1 emerged from FASL5 during Zebrafish divergence. Lastly, both systems employ late divergent genes such as ICAM1 and VECAM1. Taken together, our results suggest that these two systems constitute two different mechanical sensing mechanisms of immune cell infiltrations of the brain, yet these two systems are connected. We postulate that the mechanical properties of the cellular polarity is the main driving force determining the migration pathway. Our analysis indicates that both systems coevolved with immune cells, evolving to a higher level of complexity in association with the evolution of the immune system.


2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 304-320
Author(s):  
Ryszard Cholewinski

AbstractThis paper explores the role played by the International Labour Organization (ILO) in the consultations and stocktaking during 2017 and the negotiations during 2018 leading up to the adoption of the Global Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration (GCM). It examines selected parts of the text of the GCM, with particular reference to the ILO's mandate of securing social justice and decent work, as well as the protection of migrant workers and governance of labour migration. The final part of the paper looks ahead to the ILO's role in the implementation of the GCM, with specific reference to the Arab states region, where migration for employment is significant and the governance challenges, particularly in relation to the protection of low-wage and low-skilled workers, are especially acute.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document