The Influence to Polyamide Reverse Osmosis（RO）Membranes of Slime Control Agent for RO Membranes, “KURIVERTER® IK–110”

MEMBRANE ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
pp. 44-47
Author(s):  
Yoshihiko Endou ◽  
Takahiro Kawakatsu
Keyword(s):  
Reverse Osmosis ◽  
Control Agent ◽  
Slime Control

scholarly journals Slime Control Agent.

1999 ◽  
Vol 53 (2) ◽  
pp. 183-190 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takumi Sugi
Keyword(s):  
Control Agent ◽  
Slime Control

Cellulose Acetate Reverse Osmosis Membrane Structure

1972 ◽  
Vol 30 ◽  
pp. 528-529
Author(s):  
H. K. Plummer ◽  
E. Eichen ◽  
C. D. Melvin
Keyword(s):  
Cellulose Acetate ◽  
Reverse Osmosis ◽  
Membrane Structure ◽  
Freeze Drying ◽  
Dense Layer ◽  
Water Removal ◽  
Reverse Osmosis Membrane ◽  
Correct Interpretation ◽  
Electron Image ◽  
Scanning Electron

Much of the work reported in the literature on cellulose acetate reverse osmosis membranes has raised new and important questions with regard to the dense or “active” layer of these membranes. Several thickness values and structures have been attributed to the dense layer. To ensure the correct interpretation of the cellulose acetate structure thirteen different preparative techniques have been used in this investigation. These thirteen methods included various combinations of water substitution, freeze drying, freeze sectioning, fracturing, embedding, and microtomy techniques with both transmission and scanning electron microscope observations.It was observed that several factors can cause a distortion of the structure during sample preparation. The most obvious problem of water removal can cause swelling, shrinking, and folds. Improper removal of embedding materials, when used, can cause a loss of electron image contrast and, or structure which could hinder interpretation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document