A randomized controlled trial on the efficacy of fluoride varnish in preventing dental caries of Sjögren's syndrome patients

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Weini Xin
2011 ◽  
Vol 40 (10) ◽  
pp. 785-792 ◽  
Author(s):  
Duarte Nuno da Silva Marques ◽  
António Duarte Sola Pereira da Mata ◽  
José Maria Vaz Patto ◽  
Filipe Alexandre Duarte Barcelos ◽  
João Pedro de Almeida Rato Amaral ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
pp. annrheumdis-2020-218599
Author(s):  
Alan N Baer ◽  
Jacques-Eric Gottenberg ◽  
E William St Clair ◽  
Takayuki Sumida ◽  
Tsutomu Takeuchi ◽  
...  

ObjectivesTo evaluate efficacy and safety of abatacept in adults with active primary Sjögren’s syndrome (pSS) in a phase III, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.MethodsEligible patients (moderate-to-severe pSS [2016 ACR/European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) criteria], EULAR Sjögren’s Syndrome Disease Activity Index [ESSDAI] ≥5, anti-SS-related antigen A/anti-Ro antibody positive) received weekly subcutaneous abatacept 125 mg or placebo for 169 days followed by an open-label extension to day 365. Primary endpoint was mean change from baseline in ESSDAI at day 169. Key secondary endpoints were mean change from baseline in EULAR Sjögren’s Syndrome Patient Reported Index (ESSPRI) and stimulated whole salivary flow (SWSF) at day 169. Other secondary clinical endpoints included glandular functions and patient-reported outcomes. Selected biomarkers and immune cell phenotypes were examined. Safety was monitored.ResultsOf 187 patients randomised, 168 completed double-blind period and 165 continued into open-label period. Mean (SD) baseline ESSDAI and ESSPRI total scores were 9.4 (4.3) and 6.5 (2.0), respectively. Statistical significance was not reached for primary (ESSDAI −3.2 abatacept vs −3.7 placebo, p=0.442) or key secondary endpoints (ESSPRI, p=0.337; SWSF, p=0.584). No clinical benefit of abatacept over placebo at day 169 was seen with other clinical and PRO endpoints. Relative to baseline, abatacept was associated with significant differences vs placebo in some disease-relevant biomarkers (including IgG, IgA, IgM-rheumatoid factor) and pathogenic cell subpopulations (post hoc analyses). No new safety signals were identified.ConclusionsAbatacept treatment did not result in significant clinical efficacy compared with placebo in patients with moderate-to-severe pSS, despite evidence of biological activity.


2010 ◽  
Vol 69 (6) ◽  
pp. 945-948 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nienke Roescher ◽  
Paul P Tak ◽  
Gabor G Illei

The dysregulated cytokine network in Sjögren's Syndrome (SS) is reflected by local and systemic overexpression of pro-inflammatory cytokines and absent or low levels of anti-inflammatory cytokines. To date, the use of cytokine based therapies in SS has been disappointing. Oral administration of low dose interferon (IFN) α showed inconsistent efficacy in various studies and failed to achieve the primary endpoint in a pivotal randomised controlled trial. Similarly, neither of the two tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-α blockers tested (etanercept and infliximab) showed efficacy in placebo controlled trials. Although the rationale for low dose oral IFN treatment has not been firmly established, TNF blockade was based on solid preclinical data. Therefore, the reason for the lack of efficacy is unclear, but recent data suggest that unexpected biological effects of TNF antagonists may have contributed to this. Cytokines, given their central role in the pathogenesis of SS, remain attractive targets for future treatments, despite the disappointing early results. Inflammatory cytokines are obvious candidates, and agents against several of them are available or under development for other autoimmune diseases similar to SS. New candidate cytokines such as IL-17 and IL-12 and/or IL-23 may provide promising targets for SS. Additionally, as an alternative to systemic treatment, which has the risk of potentially severe side effects, the use of local cytokine directed therapy should be explored.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document