Efficacy and prognosis of mastoscopic axillary lymph node dissection for breast cancer: a systematic evaluation and meta-analysis

TMR Cancer ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 17
Author(s):  
HongYi Lan ◽  
YiHua Fan ◽  
Yang Chen ◽  
WanTing Cui ◽  
WenHan Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Lymph Node ◽  
Axillary Lymph Node Dissection ◽  
Lymph Node Dissection ◽  
Axillary Lymph Node ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Systematic Evaluation ◽  
Axillary Lymph ◽  
Node Dissection

scholarly journals Contrast of Mastoscopic and Conventional Axillary Lymph Node Dissection of Patients With Breast Cancer: Meta-Analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 107327482093298
Author(s):  
Hanchu Xiong ◽  
Zihan Chen ◽  
Ling Xu ◽  
Cong Chen ◽  
Qingshuang Fu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Lymph Node ◽  
Axillary Lymph Node Dissection ◽  
Lymph Node Dissection ◽  
Axillary Lymph Node ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Axillary Lymph ◽  
Node Dissection ◽  
Intraoperative Bleeding

Mastoscopic axillary lymph node dissection (MALND) is a currently used and safe surgical treatment option for breast cancer. However, the extensive application of MALND is still debatable because of the use of conventional axillary lymph node dissection (CALND). Therefore, in the current study, we aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of MALND and CALND for obtaining evidence-based conclusions about the short-term and long-term outcomes of MALND for patients with breast cancer. PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and CNKI were comprehensively searched for articles published between January 1998 and January 2019. Then Newcastle-Ottawa scale was used for quality assessment. The Review Manager software version 5.0 was utilized for generating forest maps and funnel plots. Twelve studies including 2157 patients were selected for the meta-analysis. There were no significant differences in the number of lymph node dissections, tumor recurrence rate, axillary drainage, postoperative hospitalization time, and tumor size between the MALND and CALND groups ( P > .05). In the MALND group, the surgery time was longer, while the incidence of intraoperative bleeding was lesser and the duration of drainage was shorter than those in the CALND group ( P < .01). The complications in the MALND group were also fewer than those in the CALND group ( P < .05). The results of the current study showed that MALND is reliable and feasible for breast cancer owing to the lesser incidence of intraoperative bleeding, shorter drainage duration, and lower incidence of complications compared to CALND.

The changing role of axillary lymph node dissection for breast cancer

Breast Cancer ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 41-46 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masakuni Noguchi ◽  
Emi Morioka ◽  
Yukako Ohno ◽  
Miki Noguchi ◽  
Yasuharu Nakano ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Lymph Node ◽  
Axillary Lymph Node Dissection ◽  
Lymph Node Dissection ◽  
Axillary Lymph Node ◽  
Axillary Lymph ◽  
Node Dissection ◽  
Changing Role

Volume-controlled vs no/short-term drainage after axillary lymph node dissection in breast cancer surgery: A meta-analysis

The Breast ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 109-114 ◽  
Author(s):  
R.A. Droeser ◽  
D.M. Frey ◽  
D. Oertli ◽  
D. Kopelman ◽  
M.J. Baas-Vrancken Peeters ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Lymph Node ◽  
Axillary Lymph Node Dissection ◽  
Axillary Lymph Node ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Breast Cancer Surgery ◽  
Axillary Lymph ◽  
Node Dissection ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Volume Controlled
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document