scholarly journals Reverse halo sign - COVID-19

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammad Niknejad
Keyword(s):  
Choonpa Igaku ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 44 (2) ◽  
pp. 129-136
Author(s):  
Hitomi KOUSAKA ◽  
Hirotoshi HAMAGUCHI
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Ali H. Elmokadem ◽  
Dalia Bayoumi ◽  
Sherif A. Abo-Hedibah ◽  
Ahmed El-Morsy

Abstract Background To evaluate the diagnostic performance of chest CT in differentiating coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and non-COVID-19 causes of ground-glass opacities (GGO). Results A total of 80 patients (49 males and 31 females, 46.48 ± 16.09 years) confirmed with COVID-19 by RT-PCR and who underwent chest CT scan within 2 weeks of symptoms, and 100 patients (55 males and 45 females, 48.94 ± 18.97 years) presented with GGO on chest CT were enrolled in the study. Three radiologists reviewed all CT chest exams after removal of all identifying data from the images. They expressed the result as positive or negative for COVID-19 and recorded the other pulmonary CT features with mention of laterality, lobar affection, and distribution pattern. The clinical data and laboratory findings were recorded. Chest CT offered diagnostic accuracy ranging from 59 to 77.2% in differentiating COVID-19- from non-COVID-19-associated GGO with sensitivity from 76.25 to 90% and specificity from 45 to 67%. The specificity was lower when differentiating COVID-19 from non-COVID-19 viral pneumonias (30.5–61.1%) and higher (53.1–70.3%) after exclusion of viral pneumonia from the non-COVID-19 group. Patients with COVID-19 were more likely to have lesions in lower lobes (p = 0.005), peripheral distribution (p < 0.001), isolated ground-glass opacity (p = 0.043), subpleural bands (p = 0.048), reverse halo sign (p = 0.005), and vascular thickening (p = 0.013) but less likely to have pulmonary nodules (p < 0.001), traction bronchiectasis (p = 0.005), pleural effusion (p < 0.001), and lymphadenopathy (p < 0.001). Conclusions Chest CT offered reasonable sensitivity when differentiating COVID-19- from non-COVID-19-associated GGO with low specificity when differentiating COVID-19 from other viral pneumonias and moderate specificity when differentiating COVID-19 from other causes of GGO.


2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1534.2-1535
Author(s):  
G. Evangelatos ◽  
G. E. Fragoulis ◽  
A. Iliopoulos

Background:Giant cell arteritis (GCA) has two subtypes, the cranial form (“cranial GCA”) and the large-vessel form (“LV-GCA”). GCA can present with “cranial” symptoms (headache, visual symptoms, jaw claudication, scalp tenderness), constitutional symptoms (fever, fatigue), limb claudication and symptoms of polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) and usually causes increased inflammation markers, anemia and thrombocytosis. Ultrasound (US) of the temporal and axillary arteries has a well-established role in cranial GCA and LV-GCA diagnosis, respectively. However, it is unknown whether specific clinical and laboratory parameters are linked with US findings suggestive of vascular inflammation (“halo” sign).Objectives:The aim of this study was to examine possible association between clinical and laboratory characteristics of the patients and detection of vessel wall inflammation in the US.Methods:Patients ≥50 years old with elevated ESR (≥50mm/h) and/or CRP (≥10mg/L) that presented in our outpatient rheumatology clinics from July 2017 to December 2019 with possible clinical diagnosis of GCA were included. Three groups were compared: Patients with “cranial symptoms” (with or without PMR), patients with PMR symptoms only and patients with increased inflammation markers without specific symptoms indicative of GCA. Temporal arteries and their main branches, as well as facial and axillary arteries were evaluated by US bilaterally for the presence of non-compressible “halo sign” at the vessel wall. Clinical symptomatology and the occurrence of anemia and thrombocytosis were recorded.Results:52 patients were included. 71.2% were females, with a mean±SD age of 71.0±10.0 years. 17 patients had “cranial symptoms” (seven patients with concomitant PMR and ten without), 17 patients had PMR symptoms only, while 18 patients had non-specific symptoms (e.g. fever) (Table 1). Among 17 patients with “cranial symptoms”, 7/7 (100%) with concomitant PMR had a positive temporal US, while only 3 out of 10 (30%) without PMR had a positive temporal US (p<0.01) and US was indeterminate in 2 of them (20%). Collectively, 10/17 (58.8%) of patients with “cranial symptoms” and systemic inflammation had a US examination compatible with GCA. No patient with “cranial symptoms” had a positive US of axillary arteries. No patient with only PMR symptoms, had “halo sign” in temporal and facial arteries, while 3 out of 17 (17.6%) had a positive axillary US. From the 18 patients with elevated ESR/CRP, one had a positive temporal US and another one had a positive axillary US. Regarding specific symptoms, positive temporal US was associated with new headache (p=0.003), vision impairment (p=0.001), jaw claudication (p=0.05), scalp tenderness (p=0.01) and fever (P=0.002), but not with PMR (p=0.317). Thrombocytosis was associated with an increased risk for “halo sign” detection in temporal (p=0.04) and facial (p=0.007) arteries, but not in axilliary arteries (p=0.52).Conclusion:60% of patients with “cranial symptoms” and elevated inflammation markers have US temporal findings indicative of GCA. This is more pronounced in patients with concomitant PMR symptoms and is associated with specific symptomatology. 18% of patients with only PMR symptoms might have LV-GCA, while those with high ESR/CRP without GCA-related symptoms rarely have “halo sign” in US.Disclosure of Interests:None declared


2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 664.3-664
Author(s):  
I. Monjo ◽  
E. Fernández-Fernández ◽  
J. Ortega ◽  
E. De Miguel

Background:Giant cell arteritis (GCA) is a vasculitis that affects the medium and large vessels (LV). Although cranial artery involvement is better known, awareness of the importance of LV involvement is increasing. Imaging techniques currently constitute the basis for the diagnosis of LV-GCA and have improved its diagnosis and prevalence. In recent years, differences in clinical patterns and different inflammatory and etiopathogenic mechanisms of the disease have been suggested. Therefore, improving sensitivity to diagnosis is essential to improve the knowledge and care of our population.Objectives:The aim of this study was to know the prevalence of the different ultrasound patterns of GCA in our area.Methods:Retrospective records of available data were collected from all patients referred to our ACG fast track clinic in the past three years. The clinical and laboratory characteristics were evaluated at the time of referral. All patients underwent an ultrasound scan of cranial vessels (superficial temporal arteries (TA) and their frontal and parietal branches) and large vessels (axillary, subclavian and carotid arteries). The doctor confirmed the GCA diagnosis after at least six months of follow-up. The OMERACT definitions of halo sign with a hypoechoic wall thickness ≥ 0.34 mm were used for TA pathology for the ultrasound diagnosis of GCA and for axillary, subclavian and carotid arteries and homogeneous hypoechoic thicknesses ≥ 1 mm of the arterial wall were applied. Atherosclerosis lesions were evaluated to detect this disease as a possible false positive halo sign. An Esaote Mylab Twice with a 13 MHz probe in BT and 22 MHz for cranial vessels in 2017-2019 and an Esaote Mylab X8plus with a 15 MHz probe for BT and a 24 MHz probe for cranial arteries in 2019-2020 were used by two rheumatologist with long experience in ACG ultrasound.Results:A total of 261 patients (180 women / 81 men) with suspected GCA were evaluated in our fast track clinic. The mean age (± SD) was 76 ± 9.2 years and CRP at diagnosis was 75.7 ± 68.6 mg/L. The time elapsed since the first symptoms was less than 6, 6-12, 12-24 or >24 weeks in 37.5%, 19.9%, 12.3% and 15.7% respectively. Of the 261 cases explored, 160 had GCA, of which 102 were women and 58 men, and had a mean age of 77.21 ± 7.9 years. The ultrasound patterns of GCA were: 71 patients had exclusive involvement of the TA (cranial-GCA), 54 had a mixed pattern with involvement of both TA and LV (mixed-CGA), and 35 had isolated involvement of the LV (LV-GCA). That is, 125 patients had cranial involvement with or without LV involvement and 89 had LV-GCA associated or not with cranial involvement (Figure 1).Figure 1.Ultrasound patters of GCAConclusion:Ultrasound is a useful tool for the screening of GCA and its different subtypes of vascular involvement. The isolated cranial subtype or associated with LV-GCA is the most common (78% of cases), but LV-GCA is also very common (55.6% of cases of GCA) and 21.9% presents as an isolated LV-GCA standard. The LV arteries should be included in the ultrasound examination for suspected GCA.Disclosure of Interests:Irene Monjo Speakers bureau: Roche, Novartis, UCB, Gedeon Richter, Consultant of: Roche, Elisa Fernández-Fernández: None declared, Javier Ortega: None declared, Eugenio de Miguel Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Novartis, Pfizer, MSD, BMS, UCB, Roche, Grunental, Janssen, Sanofi, Paid instructor for: Janssen, Novartis, Roche, Consultant of: AbbVie, Novartis, Pfizer, Galapagos, Grant/research support from: Abbvie, Novartis, Pfizer


Injury ◽  
1994 ◽  
Vol 25 (10) ◽  
pp. 649-652 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.J. Perchinsky ◽  
W.B. Long ◽  
S. Urman ◽  
A. Borzotta

2013 ◽  
Vol 58 (5) ◽  
pp. 672-678 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Legouge ◽  
D. Caillot ◽  
M.-L. Chrétien ◽  
I. Lafon ◽  
E. Ferrant ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
pp. 22-25 ◽  
Author(s):  
Majid Moosavi Movahed ◽  
Hadiseh Hosamirudsari ◽  
Fariba Mansouri ◽  
Farzaneh Mohammadizia

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hong‑Wei Tian ◽  
Wei‑Bing Yang ◽  
Meng‑Jie Yang ◽  
Jing‑Yuan Liu ◽  
Jian‑Chu Zhang ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 7 (10) ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcus Denard Freeman ◽  
Joseph R. Grajo ◽  
Neel D. Karamsadkar ◽  
Thora S. Steffensen ◽  
Todd R. Hazelton

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document