scholarly journals Spinoglenoid notch syndrome

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Henry Knipe ◽  
Subhan Iqbal
Keyword(s):  
2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (9) ◽  
pp. e963-e967 ◽  
Author(s):  
Trai Promsang ◽  
Kitiphong Kongrukgreatiyos ◽  
Somsak Kuptniratsaikul

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (11) ◽  
pp. e1785-e1789
Author(s):  
Kadir Buyukdogan ◽  
Burak Altintas ◽  
Özgür Koyuncu ◽  
İlker Eren ◽  
Olgar Birsel ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daichi Ishimaru ◽  
Akihito Nagano ◽  
Nobuo Terabayashi ◽  
Yutaka Nishimoto ◽  
Haruhiko Akiyama

We describe a case of suprascapular nerve entrapment caused by protrusion of an intraosseous ganglion of the glenoid into the spinoglenoid notch. A 47-year-old man with left shoulder pain developed an intraosseous cyst in the left glenoid, which came into contact with the suprascapular nerve. The area at which the patient experienced spontaneous shoulder pain was innervated by the suprascapular nerve, and 1% xylocaine injection into the spinoglenoid notch under ultrasonographic guidance relieved the pain. Therefore, we concluded that the protrusion of an intraosseous cyst of the glenoid into the spinoglenoid notch was a cause of the pain, and performed curettage. Consequently, the shoulder pain was resolved promptly without suprascapular nerve complications, and the cyst was histologically diagnosed as an intraosseous ganglion. This case demonstrated that the intraosseous ganglion of the glenoid was a benign lesion but could be a cause of suprascapular nerve entrapment syndrome. Curettage is a useful treatment option for a ganglion inside bone and very close to the suprascapular nerve.


2013 ◽  
Vol 22 (11) ◽  
pp. e1-e8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathan A. Mall ◽  
James E. Hammond ◽  
Brett A. Lenart ◽  
Daniel J. Enriquez ◽  
Stacy L. Twigg ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 44
Author(s):  
VemuriRama Tharaknath ◽  
Surath Amarnath ◽  
SushilKumar Kamaraju ◽  
Raja Challapalli
Keyword(s):  

2013 ◽  
Vol 02 (03) ◽  
pp. 140-144
Author(s):  
Vandana R. ◽  
Sudha Patil

Abstract Background and aims: Suprascapular nerve may be compressed anywhere along its course but most commonly at the level of SSN (suprascapular notch) and spinoglenoid notch. The variation in the morphological and morphometric features of SSN, spinoglenoid notch, therefore plays a crucial role in the suprascapular nerve entrapment syndrome. The purpose of present study was to determine the variation in morphology and dimensions of SSN and to determine posterosuperior and posterior limits of safe zone for shoulder joint procedures from posterior approach. Material & methods: We conducted study on 134 dry scapulae of north Karnataka region and classified the SSN into various shapes according to Iqbal et al and I-VI types based on description by Natsis et al, along with this, the mean distance from the SSN to supraglenoid tubercle and the mean distance between posterior rim of glenoid cavity and medial wall of spinoglenoid notch at the base of scapular spine were also measured. Results: Based on Iqbal et al classification, 'U' shaped notch found to be most common (35%) whereas least common was W shaped (0.7%).The incidence of complete ossification of STSL was 12.6%. Based on Natsis classification most common was type II (TD>VL) seen in 69% and least common was type VI (notch & foramen) 0% .The mean distance from SSN to supraglenoid tubercle was 27.3 mms ± 1.7 and mean distance between posterior rim of glenoid cavity and medial wall of spinoglenoid notch at the base of scapular spine was 13mms ± 0.2 which are comparatively less than the other population studies which are mentioned in the article. Conclusions: There are variations in the shape and size of SSN and safe zone critical distance in different populations so it requires still more population specific studies on suprascapular notch.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document