scholarly journals CT liver volumetry (liver transplantation protocol)

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew Murphy ◽  
Eslam Taha
QJM ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 114 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Omina Ahmed Kamal ◽  
Enas Ahmed Azab ◽  
Ahmed Abdelsamie Mahmoud ◽  
Emad Hamid Abdeldayem ◽  
Eslam Mahmoud Taha

Abstract Aim of the work To evaluate the effectiveness and advantages of automated CT volumetry in the assessment of liver volume in living donor liver transplantation and to compare this technique and its results with those calculated from manual volumetry. Materials and Methods This comparative study was conducted on dynamic contrast enhanced hepatic CT scans of 21 potential living liver donors. All potential donors underwent 1st step laboratory investigations to enter the 2nd step investigations for living donor liver transplantation operation. Automated liver volumetry was developed using the Myrian® XP-Liver software. To establish reference standard liver volumes, a radiologist manually traced the contour of the liver on each CT slice. We compared the results obtained with automated with those obtained with the reference standard for this study, manual volumetry. Results The study showed that automated CT liver volumetry achieved excellent agreement with manual volumetry without statistical significance. The average processing times for automated volumetry was 3.09 ± 0.44 min/case, whereas those for manual volumetry were 16.23 ± 0.81 min/case, the difference was statistically significant (p < 0.05). Conclusion Automated CT liver volumetry performed using the Myrian® XP-Liver software can accurately predict the preoperative liver volume and provide acceptable measurements comparable to the gold standard manual volumetry.


2012 ◽  
Vol 198 (6) ◽  
pp. W568-W574 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alain Luciani ◽  
Laszlo Rusko ◽  
Laurence Baranes ◽  
Eric Pichon ◽  
Blandine Loze ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. 253-259
Author(s):  
Nagoud Schukfeh ◽  
Maren Schulze ◽  
Anna Charlotte Holland ◽  
Jens Dingemann ◽  
Dieter P. Hoyer ◽  
...  

AbstractAim of the studyLiving donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is regularly performed in small-sized infants. Computed tomography (CT)-based donor liver volumetry is used to estimate the graft size. The aim of our study was to assess the results of CT liver volumetry and their impact on the clinical outcome after LDLT in extremely small-sized infants.Patients and methodsIn this study, we included all patients with a body weight of ≤10 kg who underwent living related liver transplantation at our centre between January 2004 and December 2014. In all cases of LDLT, a preoperative CT scan of the donor liver was performed, and the total liver and graft volumes were calculated. The graft shape was estimated by measuring the ventro-dorsal (thickness), cranio-caudal, and transversal (width) diameter of segment II/III. We assessed the impact of CT donor liver volumetry and other risk factors on the outcome, defined as patient and graft survival.ResultsIn the study period, a total of 48 living related liver transplantations were performed at our centre in infants ≤10 kg [20 male (42%), 28 female (58%)]. The mean weight was 7.3 kg (range 4.4–10 kg). Among the recipients, 33 (69%) received primary abdominal closure and 15 (31%) had temporary abdominal closure. The patient and graft survival rates were 85% and 81%, respectively. In CT volumetry, the mean estimated graft volume was 255 mL (range 140–485 mL) and the actual measured mean graft weight was 307 g (range 127–463 g). The mean ventro-dorsal diameter of segment II/III was 6.9 cm (range 4.3–11.2 cm), the mean cranio-caudal diameter was 9 cm (range 5–14 cm), and the mean width was 10.5 cm (range 6–14.7 cm). The mean graft-body weight ratio (GBWR) was 4.38% (range 1.41–8.04%). A high graft weight, a GBWR >4%, and a large ventro-dorsal diameter of segment II/III were risk factors for poorer patient survival.ConclusionPreoperative assessment of the graft size is a crucial investigation before LDLT. For extremely small-sized recipients, not only the graft weight but also the graft shape seems to affect the outcome.


2001 ◽  
Vol 120 (5) ◽  
pp. A77-A77
Author(s):  
D DELPHINE ◽  
F AGNESE ◽  
B NADINE ◽  
L OLIVIER ◽  
L HUBERT ◽  
...  

2001 ◽  
Vol 120 (5) ◽  
pp. A373-A374
Author(s):  
A LYRA ◽  
X FAN ◽  
S RAMRAKHIANI ◽  
A DIBISCEGLIE

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document