scholarly journals Proximal gastric pouch dilatation

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vikas Shah ◽  
Yuranga Weerakkody
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Pouch ◽  
Pouch Dilatation ◽  
Gastric Pouch Dilatation

scholarly journals Superior and Inferior Gastric Pouch Dilatation Post-Sleeve Surgery: Does Revision Work? A Systematic Review and Case Reports

2014 ◽  
Vol 05 (11) ◽  
pp. 491-500 ◽  
Author(s):  
Khalid Al Khalifa ◽  
Fatima AlSaad ◽  
Budoor Al Musaifer ◽  
Anwar Al-Mansoor ◽  
Ahmed Al Ansari
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Case Reports ◽  
Gastric Pouch ◽  
Pouch Dilatation ◽  
Gastric Pouch Dilatation

Slippage of Gastric Banding for Mobid Obesity: case report and review of literature

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Danilo Coco ◽  
Silvana Leanza
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Banding ◽  
Gastric Pouch ◽  
Gastric Fundus ◽  
General Surgeon ◽  
Oral Contrast ◽  
Review Of Literature ◽  
Band Slippage ◽  
X Ray ◽  
Treatment Of Obesity ◽  
Gastric Pouch Dilatation

Background: laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LABG) remains the commonest and less invasive bariatric operation. It has many advantages in the treatment of obesity and is associated with low morbidity and mortality rates.When it happens a Gastric Band Slippage (GBS), part of the gastric fundus herniates through the band. Removal of GB is necessary to prevent necrosis of the herniated stomach.Case report: We present a case of a 40-year-old female patient who was admitted for a huge gastric pouch dilatation after 3 years of underwent LAGB.Conclusion: The LAGB is one of the most common procedures used for the treatment of morbid obesity. The complications are generally not mortal but it is necessary that complications have been recognized by general surgeon and physicians should be aware of the symptoms. Diagnosis of GBS can be made with signs or symptoms and patient’s medical history, with the use of oral contrast X-ray studies or CT Scan and surgical intervention is necessary.

The Role of 3D-MSCT Gastric Pouch Volumetric Study In Sleeve Gastrectomy

2020 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
pp. 0-0
Author(s):  
osama ahmed ◽  
Medhat Refaat ◽  
Ahmed Shalaan
Keyword(s):  
Sleeve Gastrectomy ◽  
Gastric Pouch ◽  
Volumetric Study

scholarly journals Comparison of weight loss, food consumption and frequency of vomiting among Roux-en-Y gastric bypass patients with or without constriction ring

2014 ◽  
Vol 27 (suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 43-46 ◽  
Author(s):  
Silvia Leite FARIA ◽  
Orlando Pereira FARIA ◽  
Mariane de Almeida CARDEAL
Keyword(s):  
Weight Loss ◽  
Gastric Bypass ◽  
Medical Records ◽  
Excess Weight Loss ◽  
Gastric Pouch ◽  
Excess Weight ◽  
Bariatric Patient ◽  
Constriction Ring ◽  
Ring Group ◽  
Weight Protein

BACKGROUND: After Roux-en-Y gastric bypass to avoid rapid gastric emptying, dumping syndrome and regained weight due to possible dilation of the gastric pouch, was proposed to place a ring around the gastric pouch. AIM: To compare weight loss, consumption of macronutrients and the frequency of vomiting among patients who underwent Roux-en-Y gastric bypass with and without the placement of a constriction ring around the pouch. METHOD: A retrospective study, in which an analysis of medical records was carried out, collecting data of two groups of patients: those who underwent the operation with the placement of a constriction ring (Ring Group) and those who underwent without the placement of a ring (No-Ring Group). The food intake data were analyzed using three 24-hour recalls collected randomly in postoperative nutritional accompaniment. Data on the percentage of excess weight loss and the occurrence of vomiting were collected using the weight corresponding to the most recent report at the time of data collection. RESULTS: Medical records of 60 patients were analyzed: 30 from the Ring Group (women: 80%) and 30 from the No-Ring Group (women: 87%). The average time since the Ring Group underwent the operation was 88±17.50 months, and for the No-Ring Group 51±15.3 months. The percentage of excess weight loss did not differ between the groups. The consumption of protein (g), protein/kg of weight, %protein and fiber (g) were higher in the No-Ring Group. The consumption of lipids (g) was statistically higher in the Ring Group. The percentage of patients who never reported any occurrence was statistically higher in the No-Ring Group (80%vs.46%). The percentage who frequently reported the occurrence was statistically higher in the Ring Group (25%vs.0%). CONCLUSION: The placement of a ring seems to have no advantages in weight loss, favoring a lower intake of protein and fiber and a higher incidence of vomiting, factors that have definite influence in the health of the bariatric patient.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document