scholarly journals Risk Stratification as a tool to the Integrated Care in Mental Health in Catalunya

2016 ◽  
Vol 16 (6) ◽  
pp. 260
Author(s):  
Pere Bonet-Dalmau ◽  
Cristina Molina-Parrilla ◽  
Esther Jordà-Samprieto ◽  
Montserrat Bustins-Poblet ◽  
Montserrat Clèries-Escayola ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Risk Stratification ◽  
Integrated Care

Integrated Care Case Study: A Community Mental Health Center and a Federally Qualified Health Center

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer E. Cato-Degroff ◽  
Brian Desantis ◽  
Fred Michel ◽  
Michael D. Welch ◽  
Kelly Phillips-Henry ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Community Mental Health ◽  
Health Center ◽  
Integrated Care ◽  
Community Mental Health Center ◽  
Mental Health Center ◽  
Federally Qualified Health Center

Integrated Care: Meeting Mental Health Needs After the Gulf Oil Spill

2014 ◽  
Vol 65 (3) ◽  
pp. 280-283 ◽  
Author(s):  
Howard J. Osofsky ◽  
Joy D. Osofsky ◽  
John H. Wells ◽  
Carl Weems
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Integrated Care ◽  
Oil Spill ◽  
Health Needs ◽  
Mental Health Needs ◽  
Gulf Oil Spill

scholarly journals Integrated care for mental health social inclusion through job placement: Implementing IPS in Spain

2016 ◽  
Vol 16 (6) ◽  
pp. 207
Author(s):  
Débora Koatz ◽  
Pilar Hilarión ◽  
Pere Bonet ◽  
Rosa Suñol
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Integrated Care ◽  
Social Inclusion ◽  
Job Placement

scholarly journals Integrated care to address the physical health needs of people with severe mental illness: a rapid review

2016 ◽  
Vol 4 (13) ◽  
pp. 1-130 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark Rodgers ◽  
Jane Dalton ◽  
Melissa Harden ◽  
Andrew Street ◽  
Gillian Parker ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Physical Health ◽  
Integrated Care ◽  
Health Needs ◽  
Rapid Review ◽  
Advisory Group ◽  
Service Users ◽  
Physical Health Care ◽  
Facilitators And Barriers

BackgroundPeople with mental health conditions have a lower life expectancy and poorer physical health outcomes than the general population. Evidence suggests that this discrepancy is driven by a combination of clinical risk factors, socioeconomic factors and health system factors.Objective(s)To explore current service provision and map the recent evidence on models of integrated care addressing the physical health needs of people with severe mental illness (SMI) primarily within the mental health service setting. The research was designed as a rapid review of published evidence from 2013–15, including an update of a comprehensive 2013 review, together with further grey literature and insights from an expert advisory group.SynthesisWe conducted a narrative synthesis, using a guiding framework based on nine previously identified factors considered to be facilitators of good integrated care for people with mental health problems, supplemented by additional issues emerging from the evidence. Descriptive data were used to identify existing models, perceived facilitators and barriers to their implementation, and any areas for further research.Findings and discussionThe synthesis incorporated 45 publications describing 36 separate approaches to integrated care, along with further information from the advisory group. Most service models were multicomponent programmes incorporating two or more of the nine factors: (1) information sharing systems; (2) shared protocols; (3) joint funding/commissioning; (4) colocated services; (5) multidisciplinary teams; (6) liaison services; (7) navigators; (8) research; and (9) reduction of stigma. Few of the identified examples were described in detail and fewer still were evaluated, raising questions about the replicability and generalisability of much of the existing evidence. However, some common themes did emerge from the evidence. Efforts to improve the physical health care of people with SMI should empower people (staff and service users) and help remove everyday barriers to delivering and accessing integrated care. In particular, there is a need for improved communication between professionals and better information technology to support them, greater clarity about who is responsible and accountable for physical health care, and awareness of the effects of stigmatisation on the wider culture and environment in which services are delivered.Limitations and future workThe literature identified in the rapid review was limited in volume and often lacked the depth of description necessary to acquire new insights. All members of our advisory group were based in England, so this report has limited information on the NHS contexts specific to Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland. A conventional systematic review of this topic would not appear to be appropriate in the immediate future, although a more interpretivist approach to exploring this literature might be feasible. Wherever possible, future evaluations should involve service users and be clear about which outcomes, facilitators and barriers are likely to be context-specific and which might be generalisable.FundingThe research reported here was commissioned and funded by the Health Services and Delivery Research programme as part of a series of evidence syntheses under project number 13/05/11. For more information visitwww.nets.nihr.ac.uk/projects/hsdr/130511.

Integrating Clinical Nurse Specialists into the Treatment of Primary Care Patients with Depression

2003 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 17-37 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ralph W. Swindle ◽  
Jaya K. Rao ◽  
Ahdy Helmy ◽  
Laurie Plue ◽  
X. H. Zhou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Depressive Symptoms ◽  
Integrated Care ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Treatment Plan ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Nurse Specialist ◽  
Clinical Nurse ◽  
Primary Care Patients

Objective: To examine the effectiveness of integrating generalist and specialist care for veterans with depression. Method: We conducted a randomized trial of patients screening positive for depression at two Veterans Affairs Medical Center general medicine clinic firms. Control firm physicians were notified prior to the encounter when eligible patients had PRIME-MD depression diagnoses. In the intervention firm, a mental health clinical nurse specialist (CNS) was to: design a treatment plan; implement that plan with the primary care physician; and monitor patients via telephone or visits at two weeks, one month and two months. Primary outcomes (depressive symptoms, patient satisfaction with health care) were collected at 3 and 12 months. Results: Of 268 randomized patients, 246 (92%) and 222 (83%) completed 3- and 12-month follow-up interviews. There were no between-group differences in depressive symptoms or satisfaction at 3 or 12 months. The intervention group had greater chart documentation of depression at baseline (63% versus 33%, p = 0.003) and a higher referral rate to mental health services at 3 months (27% versus 9%, p = 0.019). There was no difference in the rate of new prescriptions for, or adequate dosing of, anti-depressant medications. In 40% of patients, CNSs disagreed with the PRIME-MD depression diagnosis, and their rates of watchful waiting were correspondingly high. Conclusions: Implementing an integrated care model did not occur as intended. Experienced CNSs often did not see the need for treatment in many primary care patients identified by the PRIME-MD. Integrating integrated care models in actual practice may prove challenging.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document