scholarly journals A review of the Care Coordination Mechanisms used in Integrated Care Interventions to deliver care across sectors for community-dwelling older people

2013 ◽  
Vol 13 (8) ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Roe ◽  
P. Charles Normand
2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 348
Author(s):  
Roelof Ettema ◽  
Marian De vander Schueren ◽  
Ben Witteman ◽  
Elke Nauman ◽  
Getty Huisman-De Waal

2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (s2) ◽  
pp. 295
Author(s):  
Roelof Ettema ◽  
Marian De van der Schueren ◽  
Ben Witteman ◽  
Elke Naumann ◽  
Getty Huisman

2020 ◽  
Vol 49 (6) ◽  
pp. 1048-1055
Author(s):  
Ruby Yu ◽  
Cecilia Tong ◽  
Jean Woo

Abstract Objectives to evaluate the effect of an integrated care model for pre-frail and frail community-dwelling older people. Design a quasi-experimental design. Setting and participants we enrolled people aged ≥60 years from a community care project. An inclusion criterion was pre-frailty/frailty, as measured by a simple frailty questionnaire (FRAIL) with a score of ≥1. Methods we assigned participants to an intervention group (n = 183) in which they received an integrated intervention (in-depth assessment, personalised care plans and coordinated care) or a control group (n = 270) in which they received a group education session on frailty prevention. The outcomes were changes in frailty, individual domains of frailty (‘fatigue’, ‘resistance’, ‘ambulation’, ‘illnesses’ and ‘loss of weight’) and health services utilisation over 12 months. Assessments were conducted at baseline and at the 12-month follow-up. Results the mean age of the participants (n = 453) at baseline was 76.1 ± 7.5 years, and 363 (80.1%) were women. At follow-up, the intervention group showed significantly greater reductions in FRAIL scores than the control group (P < 0.033). In addition, 22.4% of the intervention and 13.7% of the control participants had reverted from pre-frail/frail to robust status, with the difference reaching significance when the intervention was compared with the control group (odds ratio [OR] 1.6, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.0–2.4) after adjustments for age, sex, living arrangement/marital status and hypercholesterolemia. For individual domains of frailty, the adjusted OR for improved ‘resistance’ was 1.7 (95% CI 1.0–2.8). However, no effects were found on reducing use of health services. Conclusion the integrated health and social care model reduced FRAIL scores in a combined population of pre-frail/frail community-dwelling older people attending older people’s centres.


2021 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Suzanne Smith ◽  
Lucia Carragher

Abstract Background Urgent out-of-hours medical care is necessary to ensure people can remain living at home into older age. However, older people experience multiple barriers to using out-of-hours services including poor awareness about the general practitioner (GP) out-of-hours (GPOOH) service and how to access it. In particular, older people are reluctant users of GPOOH services because they expect either their symptoms will not be taken seriously or they will simply be referred to hospital accident and emergency services. The aim of this study was to examine if this expectation was borne out in the manner of GPOOH service provision. Objective The objective was to establish the urgency categorization and management of calls to GPOOH , for community dwelling older people in Ireland. Methods An 8-week sample of 770 calls, for people over 65 years, to a GPOOH service in Ireland, was analysed using Excel and Nvivo software. Results Urgency categorization of older people shows 40% of calls categorized as urgent. Recognition of the severity of symptoms, prompting calls to the GPOOH service, is also reflected in a quarter of callers receiving a home visit by the GP and referral of a third of calls to emergency services. The findings also show widespread reliance on another person to negotiate the GPOOH system, with a third party making 70% of calls on behalf of the older person seeking care. Conclusion Older people are in urgent need of medical services when they contact GPOOH service, which plays an effective and patient-centred gatekeeping role, particularly directing the oldest old to the appropriate level of care outside GP office hours. The promotion of GPOOH services should be enhanced to ensure older people understand their role in supporting community living.


Author(s):  
Hsiao‐Ting Tsou ◽  
Tai‐Yin Wu ◽  
Kuan‐Liang Kuo ◽  
Sheng‐Huang Hsiao ◽  
Sheng‐Jean Huang ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document