scholarly journals Development of a Clinical Decision Support System for Pediatric Abdominal Pain in Emergency Department Settings Across Two Health Systems Within the HCSRN

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Heidi L. Ekstrom ◽  
Elyse O. Kharbanda ◽  
Dustin W. Ballard ◽  
David R. Vinson ◽  
Gabriela Vazquez-Benitez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Abdominal Pain ◽  
Decision Support ◽  
Decision Support System ◽  
Health Systems ◽  
Clinical Decision Support ◽  
Support System ◽  
Clinical Decision Support System ◽  
Clinical Decision

scholarly journals Alert Override Patterns With a Medication Clinical Decision Support System in an Academic Emergency Department: Retrospective Descriptive Study (Preprint)

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Junsang Yoo ◽  
Jeonghoon Lee ◽  
Poong-Lyul Rhee ◽  
Dong Kyung Chang ◽  
Mira Kang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Emergency Department ◽  
Logistic Regression ◽  
Decision Support ◽  
Decision Support System ◽  
Clinical Decision Support ◽  
Support System ◽  
Clinical Decision Support System ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Broad Perspective

BACKGROUND Physicians’ alert overriding behavior is considered to be the most important factor leading to failure of computerized provider order entry (CPOE) combined with a clinical decision support system (CDSS) in achieving its potential adverse drug events prevention effect. Previous studies on this subject have focused on specific diseases or alert types for well-defined targets and particular settings. The emergency department is an optimal environment to examine physicians’ alert overriding behaviors from a broad perspective because patients have a wider range of severity, and many receive interdisciplinary care in this environment. However, less than one-tenth of related studies have targeted this physician behavior in an emergency department setting. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to describe alert override patterns with a commercial medication CDSS in an academic emergency department. METHODS This study was conducted at a tertiary urban academic hospital in the emergency department with an annual census of 80,000 visits. We analyzed data on the patients who visited the emergency department for 18 months and the medical staff who treated them, including the prescription and CPOE alert log. We also performed descriptive analysis and logistic regression for assessing the risk factors for alert overrides. RESULTS During the study period, 611 physicians cared for 71,546 patients with 101,186 visits. The emergency department physicians encountered 13.75 alerts during every 100 orders entered. Of the total 102,887 alerts, almost two-thirds (65,616, 63.77%) were overridden. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses identified 21 statistically significant risk factors for emergency department physicians’ alert override behavior. CONCLUSIONS In this retrospective study, we described the alert override patterns with a medication CDSS in an academic emergency department. We found relatively low overrides and assessed their contributing factors, including physicians’ designation and specialty, patients’ severity and chief complaints, and alert and medication type.

scholarly journals Alert Override Patterns With a Medication Clinical Decision Support System in an Academic Emergency Department: Retrospective Descriptive Study

10.2196/23351 ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (11) ◽  
pp. e23351 ◽  
Author(s):  
Junsang Yoo ◽  
Jeonghoon Lee ◽  
Poong-Lyul Rhee ◽  
Dong Kyung Chang ◽  
Mira Kang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Emergency Department ◽  
Logistic Regression ◽  
Decision Support ◽  
Decision Support System ◽  
Clinical Decision Support ◽  
Support System ◽  
Clinical Decision Support System ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Broad Perspective

Background Physicians’ alert overriding behavior is considered to be the most important factor leading to failure of computerized provider order entry (CPOE) combined with a clinical decision support system (CDSS) in achieving its potential adverse drug events prevention effect. Previous studies on this subject have focused on specific diseases or alert types for well-defined targets and particular settings. The emergency department is an optimal environment to examine physicians’ alert overriding behaviors from a broad perspective because patients have a wider range of severity, and many receive interdisciplinary care in this environment. However, less than one-tenth of related studies have targeted this physician behavior in an emergency department setting. Objective The aim of this study was to describe alert override patterns with a commercial medication CDSS in an academic emergency department. Methods This study was conducted at a tertiary urban academic hospital in the emergency department with an annual census of 80,000 visits. We analyzed data on the patients who visited the emergency department for 18 months and the medical staff who treated them, including the prescription and CPOE alert log. We also performed descriptive analysis and logistic regression for assessing the risk factors for alert overrides. Results During the study period, 611 physicians cared for 71,546 patients with 101,186 visits. The emergency department physicians encountered 13.75 alerts during every 100 orders entered. Of the total 102,887 alerts, almost two-thirds (65,616, 63.77%) were overridden. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses identified 21 statistically significant risk factors for emergency department physicians’ alert override behavior. Conclusions In this retrospective study, we described the alert override patterns with a medication CDSS in an academic emergency department. We found relatively low overrides and assessed their contributing factors, including physicians’ designation and specialty, patients’ severity and chief complaints, and alert and medication type.

scholarly journals Effect of Computerized Physician Order Entry and Clinical Decision Support System on Adverse Drug Events Prevention in the Emergency Department: A Systematic Review

2020 ◽  
pp. 875512252095816
Author(s):  
Sadrieh Hajesmaeel Gohari ◽  
Kambiz Bahaadinbeigy ◽  
Shahrad Tajoddini ◽  
Sharareh R. Niakan Kalhori
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Decision Support ◽  
Decision Support System ◽  
Clinical Decision Support ◽  
Support System ◽  
Clinical Decision Support System ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Computerized Physician Order Entry ◽  
Order Entry ◽  
Physician Order Entry

Objective: An adverse drug event (ADE) is an injury resulting from a medical intervention related to a drug. The emergency department (ED) is a ward vulnerable to more ADEs because of overcrowding. Information technologies such as computerized physician order entry (CPOE) and clinical decision support system (CDSS) may decrease the occurrence of ADEs. This study aims to review research that reported the evaluation of the effectiveness of CPOE and CDSS on lowering the occurrence of ADEs in the ED. Data Sources: PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases were used to find studies published from 2003 to 2018. The search was conducted in November 2018. Study Selection and Data Extraction: The search resulted in 1700 retrieved articles. After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, 11 articles were included. Data on the date, country, type of system, medication process stages, study design, participants, sample size, and outcomes were extracted. Data Synthesis: Results showed that CPOE and CDSS may prevent ADEs in the ED through significantly decreasing the rate of errors, ADEs, excessive dose, and inappropriate prescribing (in 54.5% of articles); furthermore, CPOE and CDSS may significantly increase the rate of appropriate prescribing and dosing in compliance with established guidelines (45.5% of articles). Conclusion: This study revealed that the use of CPOE and CDSS can lower the occurrence of ADEs in the ED; however, further randomized controlled trials are needed to address the effect of a CDSS, with basic or advanced features, on the occurrence of ADEs in the ED.

1309-P: Utilizing a Clinical Decision Support System for Hypoglycemia Management

Diabetes ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 68 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1309-P
Author(s):  
JACQUELYN R. GIBBS ◽  
KIMBERLY BERGER ◽  
MERCEDES FALCIGLIA
Keyword(s):  
Decision Support ◽  
Decision Support System ◽  
Clinical Decision Support ◽  
Support System ◽  
Clinical Decision Support System ◽  
Clinical Decision

A Clinical Decision Support System for Assessing the Risk of Cardiovascular Diseases in Diabetic Hemodialysis Patients

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 262-269
Author(s):  
Tahere Talebi Azad Boni ◽  
Haleh Ayatollahi ◽  
Mostafa Langarizadeh
Keyword(s):  
Decision Support ◽  
Cardiovascular Diseases ◽  
Decision Support System ◽  
Clinical Decision Support ◽  
Support System ◽  
Clinical Decision Support System ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Diabetic Patients ◽  
K Value ◽  
Care Plans

Background: One of the greatest challenges in the field of medicine is the increasing burden of chronic diseases, such as diabetes. Diabetes may cause several complications, such as kidney failure which is followed by hemodialysis and an increasing risk of cardiovascular diseases. Objective: The purpose of this research was to develop a clinical decision support system for assessing the risk of cardiovascular diseases in diabetic patients undergoing hemodialysis by using a fuzzy logic approach. Methods: This study was conducted in 2018. Initially, the views of physicians on the importance of assessment parameters were determined by using a questionnaire. The face and content validity of the questionnaire was approved by the experts in the field of medicine. The reliability of the questionnaire was calculated by using the test-retest method (r = 0.89). This system was designed and implemented by using MATLAB software. Then, it was evaluated by using the medical records of diabetic patients undergoing hemodialysis (n=208). Results: According to the physicians' point of view, the most important parameters for assessing the risk of cardiovascular diseases were glomerular filtration, duration of diabetes, age, blood pressure, type of diabetes, body mass index, smoking, and C reactive protein. The system was designed and the evaluation results showed that the values of sensitivity, accuracy, and validity were 85%, 92% and 90%, respectively. The K-value was 0.62. Conclusion: The results of the system were largely similar to the patients’ records and showed that the designed system can be used to help physicians to assess the risk of cardiovascular diseases and to improve the quality of care services for diabetic patients undergoing hemodialysis. By predicting the risk of the disease and classifying patients in different risk groups, it is possible to provide them with better care plans.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document