scholarly journals The Status of e-Administration in Hungary – Are We on the Right Track?

2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 42-59
Author(s):  
Bernadett Veszprémi

The goal of this study is to define (or find out) where Hungary currently stands in the development of e-Administration solutions. The issue is more topical than ever, as infocommunications became an integral part of our daily lives, affecting both the private and public sectors, and changing our ways of working – thus, it requires our understanding. When it comes to the public sector, however, striking changes can only be achieved if the entire process of public administration is (or would be) changed. The goals are clear: work should be faster, as it would result in satisfied clients, cut costs and more efficient procedures. The question to ask now is where Hungary stands in this endeavour. Are we on the right track?

Author(s):  
John D. Bitzan ◽  
Bahman Bahrami

This study examines union wage premiums by occupation in the public sector in the U.S. for the 2000-2004 period.  In examining union-nonunion wage differences for public sector workers in occupations accounting for 66 percent of all public workers in the 2000-2004 Current Population Survey, we find positive and statistically significant union premiums for 27 out of 41 occupations examined.  We also find large differences among occupations, with miscellaneous teachers and instructors receiving a 61 percent premium, secretaries and administrative assistants receiving a 5 percent premium, and 14 occupations receiving no statistically significant premium.  In comparing union premiums by occupation between the private and public sectors, we find, in most cases, that private sector premiums are larger than public sector premiums.  Finally, an Oaxaca decomposition shows that the majority of the differential between private sector union premiums and public sector union premiums appears to be due to differences in the way unions reward workers in the private and public sectors, not because of differences in the types of workers in the private and public sectors.


Author(s):  
Yousif Abdullatif Albastaki ◽  
Adel Ismail Al-Alawi ◽  
Sara Abdulrahman Albassam

The purpose of this chapter is to emphasize the various but major aspects essential to advance knowledge management (KM) as nations progress and deal with the technological explosion that began during the early 1990s and upsurged dramatically ever since. The focus in this chapter, however, is the several ways in which technology was introduced, resisted, and finally accepted and adapted to, as well as the different ways it has and can still affect the industry in private and public sectors, negatively and positively. Through this literature review, different perceptions, opinions, solutions and suggestions are introduced to regulate the simultaneous coexistence of technology and people in the field of knowledge management development using articles from 1990s to 2018. A discussion is also introduced with supporting and opposing arguments in regard to the different perceptions the authors have proposed.


1987 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 322-338 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel P. Schwallie

The impact of intergovernmental grants on the expenditures of recipients has been the focus of considerable investigation, while their impact on the relative sizes of the public and private sectors has been given little more than brief discussion. No well-defined structure has emerged to explain how a system of intergovernmental grants might affect public sector size. This article is a first attempt at such a structure. It investigates the impact of intergovernmental grants by comparing public sector size in the presence of conditional lump-sum grants to public sector size in their absence for given grantor and recipient preferences on the allocation of financial resources between the private and public sectors. Implications are drawn from the model and comments are made pertaining to the empirical investigations of grant effects on recipient governments spending.


10.26458/1844 ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 55-73
Author(s):  
George GRUIA ◽  
George Cristian Gruia

The article is focused on presenting a comparison of the public sector with public administration policies and private sector with economical strategies with the purpose of better integration between the two with case study on the European funds in beekeeping and how by studying the bee behavior we too can develop our society to achieve better results. The scope of the article is to show an overview of the European policies into state members with focus on sustainable economic development of Romanian rural areas. This is part of the authors’ research from the last 10 years with focus on public, economic and social development and represent initial results of their yet not published work.


2020 ◽  
Vol 39 (1) ◽  
pp. 5-20
Author(s):  
Jari Autioniemi

Artificial intelligence co-creation in the public sector This article assesses the steps of AI co-creation in the public innovation ecosystem. However, in order to understand AI in the right context, two aims need to be fulfilled first. The limits and possibilities of AI in public administration are assessed by examining the contributions of AI research, phenomenology and philosopher Hubert Dreyfus. According to the article, the simpler the rules, the better for AI. Therefore, hierarchical and bureaucratic structures are best for AI application. However, bureaucratic structures are poor in innovating and exploration – AI innovations included. After this, co-creation is introduced as a way of innovating AI in the public sector. For identifying new opportunities for co-production, different forms of cross-sectoral and citizen involvement are needed.


Author(s):  
Igor Vukonjanski

Human resources management in the public administration of the Republic of Serbia is a combined model of good practices from the European administrative area and the remaining stereotypes from pre-transition period. Introduction of the public servant system with all features of contemporary public servant related legislation was a necessity that accompanied overall reform of the public administration in Serbia. The process of introducing human resources management function in the Serbian public administration has been encumbered with application of two different legal models that define the status of public servants: public servant related legislation is applied to employees in executive branches of the central government (ministries, government departments and offices), and the status of employees in city and municipal administrations is stipulated in obsolete laws, adopted over 20 years ago. It should be noted that employees in public sector are still prone to old habits in their work, which altogether reduces successful reforms in this area. This paper provides a description of the current state of affairs and opens certain questions: whether the modern human resources (HR) management in Serbia’s public sector is understood and accepted in the right way; and whether it is possible, by means of applying specific methods, to strengthen awareness of public employees concerning their actual position and responsibility to establish a new public administration, adjusted to the citizens’ needs, requirements and expectations. Relying on a decade-long personal engagement in this field, the author analyzes the current circumstances and provides critical remarks and recommendations.


Author(s):  
Antonio EZQUERRA HUERVA

LABURPENA: Lan honetan, aztertzen da ureztatzaileen komunitateak —eta, hedaduraz, ur publikoen erabiltzaileen edozein komunitate— Sektore Publikoko Kontratuen Legeari lotuta dauden ala ez. Gai eztabaidagarria da, eta horren erakusgarri da zenbait administrazio-auzitegik kontratu-errekurtsoei buruz egindako interpretazio erabat kontrajarriak defendatu izana. Defendatzen den ondorioa ez dator bat ureztatzaileen komunitateak sektore publikoko kontratuen legeriaren aplikazio-eremu subjektiboaren zati gisa hartzearekin; izan ere, komunitate horiek ez dira sartzen ez administrazio publikoaren kontzeptuan, ez administrazio publikoaren izaera ez duen botere adjudikatzailearen kontzeptuan, ezta, azken batean, botere adjudikatzailearen izaera ez duten sektore publikoko entitateen kategorian ere. ABSTRACT: This paper addresses the subjection or not of the irrigation communities —and of any communities of public water users— to the Public Sector Contracts Law. This is a contentious issue, as demonstrated by the fact that radically opposed interpretations of it have been advocated by some contractual administrative courts. The sustained conclusion is contrary to the consideration of the irrigation communities as an integral part of the subjective scope of application of the public sector contracts legislation, since they do not fit either in the concept of public administration or in the contracting authority that lacks of the status of public administration nor, finally, in the category of public sector entities which do not have the character of contracting authority. RESUMEN: En el presente trabajo se aborda el estudio acerca de la sujeción o no de las comunidades de regantes —y, por extensión, de cualesquiera comunidades de usuarios de aguas públicas— a la Ley de Contratos del Sector Público. Se trata de una cuestión controvertida, tal como lo demuestra el hecho de que sobre la misma se hayan defendido interpretaciones radicalmente opuestas por parte de algunos tribunales administrativos de recursos contractuales. La conclusión que se sostiene es contraria a la consideración de las comunidades de regantes como parte integrante del ámbito subjetivo de aplicación de la legislación de contratos del sector público, toda vez que las mismas no hallan encaje ni en el concepto de administración pública, ni en el de poder adjudicador que no tiene la condición de administración pública ni, en fin, en la categoría de las entidades del sector público que no tienen el carácter de poder adjudicador.


2007 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 34-42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Krambia-Kapardis

This paper identifies the reasons why glass ceiling and in the case of Cyprus “concrete ceiling” exists in both the private and public sectors despite enacted relevant legislation to ensure equality in work. Initially a qualitative research was carried out with the use of focus groups to identify the issues at hand. Following the results of the qualitative research, a questionnaire was prepared and distributed to the CEOs or the highest rank official of 120 organisations, 38% of those responded. This research, the first of its kind, addressed both the private and public sectors and confirms what has already been addressed in literature in other countries, namely that the main barrier hindering the career prospects of women is the family factor. In the public sector however where human intervention is eliminated women are better represented in the top-level positions.


Author(s):  
Stella Z. Theodoulou ◽  
Ravi K. Roy

Public administration ensures the development and delivery of the essential public services required for sustaining modern civilization. Covering areas from public safety and social welfare to transportation and education, the services provided through the public sector are inextricably part of our daily lives. Public Administration: A Very Short Introduction offers practical insight into the major challenges confronting the public sector in the globalized era. Tackling some of the most hotly debated issues of our time, including the privatization of public services and government surveillance, it takes the reader on a global journey through history to examine the origins, development, and continued evolution of public administration.


Author(s):  
Olga Mykhailоvna Ivanitskaya

The article is devoted to issues of ensuring transparency and ac- countability of authorities in the conditions of participatory democracy (democ- racy of participation). It is argued that the public should be guaranteed not only the right for access to information but also the prerequisites for expanding its par- ticipation in state governance. These prerequisites include: the adoption of clearly measurable macroeconomic and social goals and the provision of control of the processes of their compliance with the government by citizens of the country; ex- tension of the circle of subjects of legislative initiative due to realization of such rights by citizens and their groups; legislative definition of the forms of citizens’ participation in making publicly significant decisions, design of relevant orders and procedures, in particular participation in local referendum; outlining methods and procedures for taking into account social thought when making socially im- portant decisions. The need to disclose information about resources that are used by authorities to realize the goals is proved as well as key performance indicators that can be monitored by every citizen; the efforts made by governments of coun- tries to achieve these goals. It was noted that transparency in the conditions of representative democracy in its worst forms in a society where ignorance of the thought of society and its individual members is ignored does not in fact fulfill its main task — to establish an effective dialogue between the authorities and so- ciety. There is a distortion of the essence of transparency: instead of being heard, society is being asked to be informed — and passively accept the facts presented as due. In fact, transparency and accountability in this case are not instruments for the achievement of democracy in public administration, but by the form of a tacit agreement between the subjects of power and people, where the latter passes the participation of an “informed observer”.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document