Combined Evaluation of Matrix Metalloproteinases and their Inhibitors has Better Clinical Utility in Oral Cancer

2011 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 27-36 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ragini D. Singh ◽  
Haridas Nilayangode ◽  
Jayendra B. Patel ◽  
Franky D. Shah ◽  
Shilin N. Shukla ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Oral Cancer ◽  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Sensitivity And Specificity ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Health Hazard ◽  
Plasma Concentrations ◽  
Cervical Lymph Node Metastasis ◽  
Incidence And Mortality ◽  
Oral Cancer Patients

Background Oral cancer is a major health hazard worldwide with increasing incidence and mortality. Cervical lymph node metastasis is a major determinant of outcome in oral cancer. The matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) system is critically involved in invasion and metastasis. Assessment of MMPs and tissue inhibitors of MMPs (TIMPs) in certain combinations might have better clinical efficacy given their potential role in the metastatic process. Aim Plasma concentrations of MMP-2, MMP-9, TIMP-1 and TIMP-2 in 50 controls and 75 oral cancer patients (nonmetastatic, n=54; metastatic, n=21) were evaluated to assess their investigative value and role in predicting the behavior of this malignancy. Methods The plasma concentrations of MMP-2, MMP-9, TIMP-1 and TIMP-2 were quantified by ELISA. The best 2- and 3-marker combinations were calculated using the statistical software mROC. The diagnostic values for all the biomolecules as single markers and their combinations were estimated using the measures of diagnostic accuracy, i.e. the area under the ROC curve and the sensitivity and specificity at cutoff limits with the highest diagnostic accuracy and at the 95% limits of sensitivity and specificity, respectively. Results MMP-9, TIMP-1 and TIMP-2 were significantly elevated (p=0.000, p=0.013 and p=0.005, respectively) in oral cancer patients. MMP-9 emerged as the best single statistically significant marker in plasma for oral cancer detection. It showed an increase in diagnostic performance when tested in combination with MMP-2 and TIMP-2. The median plasma MMP-9 levels were elevated in both the metastatic and nonmetastatic groups compared with controls (p<0.004 and p<0.007, respectively). Conclusion The results indicated that plasma MMP and TIMP levels in relevant combinations may facilitate clinical decision-making for improved management of oral cancer patients and may provide important data for selecting patients for treatment with drugs that interfere with MMP and TIMP activities.

Clinical Significance of Serum p53 Antibodies in Oral Cancer

2006 ◽  
Vol 92 (2) ◽  
pp. 134-139 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rachana Narendra Singh Sainger ◽  
Manisha Hasmukhray Shah ◽  
Amisha Anil Desai ◽  
Shilin Nandubhai Shukla ◽  
Pankaj Manubhai Shah ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Oral Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Clinical Significance ◽  
P53 Antibodies ◽  
Incidence And Mortality ◽  
Serum P53 Antibodies ◽  
Antibody Positivity ◽  
Oral Cancer Patients ◽  
Serum P53 ◽  
P53 Antibody

Aim and Background The incidence and mortality due to oral cancer have increased worldwide. In India, the use of tobacco has been found to be the major etiological factor for the development of oral cancers. Various studies on serum p53 antibodies have suggested their clinical importance as prognostic markers in cancer. However, there is a dearth of data on serum p53 antibodies in oral cancer patients in India. The present study was carried to evaluate the clinical significance of serum p53 antibodies in oral cancer. Materials and Methods The serum p53 antibody status was analyzed by means of ELISA in 55 healthy individuals, 60 patients with oral precancerous conditions, 75 untreated oral cancer patients, and 86 follow-up blood samples of the oral cancer patients. Results We found serum p53 antibodies in 23% of cancer patients. The frequency of p53 antibody positivity was higher in patients with lymph node metastasis, advanced disease and well-differentiated tumors. Furthermore, p53 antibody positivity strongly correlated with poor treatment outcome in cancer patients. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed significantly poorer disease-free survival in patients with serum p53 antibodies. Conclusion The results of this study suggest the usefulness of serum p53 antibodies in the prognostication of oral cancer patients.

scholarly journals High Expression of KLF10 Is Associated with Favorable Survival in Patients with Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Medicina ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 57 (1) ◽  
pp. 17
Author(s):  
Chung-Min Yeh ◽  
Yi-Ju Lee ◽  
Po-Yun Ko ◽  
Yueh-Min Lin ◽  
Wen-Wei Sung
Keyword(s):  
Survival Rate ◽  
Oral Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Protective Factor ◽  
Female Gender ◽  
Vital Role ◽  
Cancer Stage ◽  
Independent Prognostic Marker ◽  
Oral Cancer Patients ◽  
The Impact

Background and objectives: Krüppel-like transcription factor 10 (KLF10) plays a vital role in regulating cell proliferation, including the anti-proliferative process, activation of apoptosis, and differentiation control. KLF10 may also act as a protective factor against oral cancer. We studied the impact of KLF10 expression on the clinical outcomes of oral cancer patients to identify its role as a prognostic factor in oral cancer. Materials and Methods: KLF10 immunoreactivity was analyzed by immunohistochemical (IHC) stain analysis in 286 cancer specimens from primary oral cancer patients. The prognostic value of KLF10 on overall survival was determined by Kaplan–Meier analysis and the Cox proportional hazard model. Results: High KLF10 expression was significantly associated with male gender and betel quid chewing. The 5-year survival rate was greater for patients with high KLF10 expression than for those with low KLF10 expression (62.5% vs. 51.3%, respectively; p = 0.005), and multivariate analyses showed that high KLF10 expression was the only independent factor correlated with greater overall patient survival. The significant correlation between high KLF10 expression and a higher 5-year survival rate was observed in certain subgroups of clinical parameters, including female gender, non-smokers, cancer stage T1, and cancer stage N0. Conclusions: KLF10 expression, detected by IHC staining, could be an independent prognostic marker for oral cancer patients.

scholarly journals Genetic Variants of lncRNA GAS5 Are Associated with the Clinicopathologic Development of Oral Cancer

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. 348
Author(s):  
Ming-Hong Hsieh ◽  
Hsueh-Ju Lu ◽  
Chiao-Wen Lin ◽  
Chia-Yi Lee ◽  
Shang-Jung Yang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Differentiation ◽  
Oral Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Alcohol Drinking ◽  
Tumor Size ◽  
Genetic Variants ◽  
Tumor Stage ◽  
Advanced Tumor Stage ◽  
Advanced Tumor ◽  
Oral Cancer Patients

The long noncoding RNA, Growth arrest-specific 5 (GAS5) plays a crucial role in the development of oral cancer. However, potential genetic variants in GAS5 that affect the susceptibility and progression of oral cancer have rarely been explored. In this study, two loci of GAS5 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) (rs145204276 and rs55829688) were genotyped by using the TaqMan allelic discrimination in 1125 oral cancer patients and 1195 non-oral-cancer individuals. After statistical analyses, the distribution of both the GAS5 SNP rs145204276 and GAS5 SNP rs55829688 frequencies were similar between the study and control groups. However, the patients with GAS5 SNP rs145204276 variants (Ins/Del or Del/Del) showed a higher tendency of moderate to poor cell differentiation of oral cancer (OR: 1.454, 95% CI: 1.041–2.031, p = 0.028). Moreover, the GAS5 SNP rs145204276 variants (Ins/Del or Del/Del) in the non-alcohol-drinking population were associated with significantly advanced tumor stage (OR: 1.500, 95% CI: 1.081–2.081, p = 0.015) and larger tumor size (OR: 1.494, 95% CI: 1.076–2.074, p = 0.016). Furthermore, individuals with the GAS5 SNP rs145204276 variant were associated with a higher expression of GAS5 in the GTEx database (p = 0.002), and the higher GAS5 level was associated with poor cell differentiation, advanced tumor stage and larger tumor size in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma from the TCGA database (all p < 0.05). In conclusion, the GAS5 SNP rs145204276 variant is related to poor-differentiation cell status in oral cancer. Besides, the presence of the GAS5 SNP rs145204276 variant is associated with a worse tumor stage and tumor size in oral cancer patients without alcohol drinking.

scholarly journals Adjuvant Radiotherapy Significantly Increases Neck Control and Survival in Early Oral Cancer Patients with Solitary Nodal Involvement: A National Cancer Registry Database Analysis

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (15) ◽  
pp. 3742
Author(s):  
Chia-Jen Tsai ◽  
Yu-Hsuan Kuo ◽  
Hung-Chang Wu ◽  
Chung-Han Ho ◽  
Yi-Chen Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Oral Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Cancer Registry ◽  
Adjuvant Radiotherapy ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Nodal Involvement ◽  
Cox Regression Analysis ◽  
Oral Cancer Patients ◽  
Neck Control ◽  
Registry Database

We assessed the role of adjuvant radiotherapy on neck control and survival in patients with early oral cancer with solitary nodal involvement. We identified pT1-2N1 oral cancer patients with or without adjuvant radiotherapy from the 2007–2015 Taiwan Cancer Registry database. The effect of adjuvant radiotherapy on 5-year neck control, overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were calculated using the Kaplan–Meier method, log-rank tests, and Cox regression analysis. Of 701 patients identified, 505 (72.0%) received adjuvant radiotherapy and 196 (28.0%) had surgery alone. Patients receiving adjuvant radiotherapy were more likely to be aged <65 years, pT2 stage, poorly graded and without comorbid conditions (all, p < 0.05). The 5-year OS and DFS differed significantly by receipt of adjuvant radiotherapy. Multivariable analysis showed adjuvant radiotherapy significantly associated with better 5-year OS (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR), 0.72; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.54–0.97; p = 0.0288) and DFS (aHR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.48–0.84; p = 0.0016). Stratified analysis indicated the greatest survival advantage for both 5-year OS and DFS in those with pT2 classification (p = 0.0097; 0.0009), and non-tongue disease (p = 0.0195; 0.0158). Moreover, adjuvant radiotherapy significantly protected against neck recurrence (aHR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.18–0.51; p < 0.0001). Thus, adjuvant radiotherapy is associated with improved neck control and survival in these early oral cancer patients.

scholarly journals Clinical long-term and patient-reported outcomes of dental implants in oral cancer patients

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Eik Schiegnitz ◽  
Lena Katharina Müller ◽  
Keyvan Sagheb ◽  
Lisa Theis ◽  
Vahide Cagiran ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Oral Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Dental Implants ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Implant Survival ◽  
Implant Placement ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Oral Cancer Patients

Abstract Background and purpose The aim of this clinical study was to investigate the clinical long-term and patient-reported outcome of dental implants in patients with oral cancer. In addition, analysis of the influence of radiation therapy, timing of implant insertion, and augmentation procedures on implant survival was performed. Material and methods This retrospective study investigated the clinical outcome of 711 dental implants in 164 oral cancer patients, inserted by experienced surgeons of the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Mainz, Germany. Oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) was evaluated. Results Cumulative 5-year and 10-year implant survival rates for all included implants were 87.3% and 80.0%. Implants placed straight after ablative surgery (primary implant placement) and implants placed after completing the oncologic treatment (secondary implant placement) showed a comparable implant survival (92.5% vs. 89.5%; p = 0.635). Irradiation therapy had no significant influence on implant survival of secondary placed implants (p = 0.929). However, regarding implant site (native bone vs. augmented bone) and radiation therapy (non-irradiated bone vs. irradiated bone), implants inserted in irradiated bone that received augmentation procedures showed a statistically significant lower implant survival (p < 0.001). Patients reported a distinct improvement in OHRQoL. Conclusions Promising long-term survival rates of dental implants in patients after treatment of oral cancer were seen. In addition, patients benefit in form of an improved OHRQoL. However, bone augmentation procedures in irradiated bone may result in an impaired implants’ prognosis.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document