Serum HER-2 extracellular domain: Relationship with clinicobiological presentation and prognostic value before and after primary treatment in 701 breast cancer patients

2004 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 14-22 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Saghatchian ◽  
S. Guepratte ◽  
K. Hacene ◽  
R. Neumann ◽  
J.-L. Floiras ◽  
...  
2004 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 14-22 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Saghatchian ◽  
S. Guepratte ◽  
K. Hacene ◽  
R. Neumann ◽  
J.-L. Floiras ◽  
...  

Purpose To determine the clinical correlations and prognostic value of serum HER-2 (sHER-2) before and after primary breast cancer treatment. Methods sHER-2 from 701 consecutive patients with stage I-III tumors (median follow-up 7.7 years) was assayed by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (Immuno 1, Bayer Diagnostics). Results The median pretreatment sHER-2 concentration was 8.30 ng/mL (range 3.15–82.00 ng/mL). Forty-seven patients (6.7%) had sHER-2 concentrations >12 ng/mL (cutoff level). Pretreatment sHER-2 correlated positively with CA 15.3 (p=0.0169), pathological tumor size (p=0.0082), number of invaded lymph nodes (pN, p=0.0160) and histological grading (p=0.0086). Kaplan-Meier analyses indicated that pretreatment sHER-2 was of prognostic value for contralateral breast cancer (p=0.0018), metastasis-free survival (MFS) (p=0.0008) – particularly lung (p=0.0082) and liver metastases (p=0.0035) – and overall disease-specific survival (DSS) (p=0.0020). According to pN status, pretreatment sHER-2 was of prognostic value only for pN-positive patients (p=0.0017). When combined with estradiol or progesterone receptor status, patients with elevated sHER-2 and receptor-negative tumors had a significantly shorter DSS (p<0.0001 for both receptors). Post-treatment sHER-2 also had individual prognostic value for MFS (p=0.0144) and DSS (p=0.0212). In multivariate analysis, only sHER-2 after primary treatment was an independent prognostic variable for MFS and DSS (p=0.0078 and p=0.0058, respectively). Conclusion sHER-2 elevation in early breast cancer correlates with the principal criteria of tumor aggressiveness, thus permitting selection of patients with a high risk of visceral metastases and contralateral breast tumors. Post-treatment sHER-2 is an independent prognostic factor enabling to identify patients likely to benefit from aggressive adjuvant treatments.


2006 ◽  
Vol 96 (3) ◽  
pp. 251-261 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ioannis Kostopoulos ◽  
Petroula Arapantoni-Dadioti ◽  
Helen Gogas ◽  
Savvas Papadopoulos ◽  
Vasiliki Malamou-Mitsi ◽  
...  

1997 ◽  
Vol 15 (7) ◽  
pp. 2518-2525 ◽  
Author(s):  
H Yamauchi ◽  
A O'Neill ◽  
R Gelman ◽  
W Carney ◽  
D Y Tenney ◽  
...  

PURPOSE Overexpression of the HER-2/c-neu/c-erbB2 proto-oncogene is associated with a worse prognosis in patients with breast cancer, perhaps due to an association of the HER-2 proto-oncogene protein with resistance to hormone and/or chemotherapy. Circulating levels of the extracellular domain (ECD) of the HER-2/c-neu-related protein (NRP) are elevated in 20% to 40% of patients with metastatic breast cancer. We investigated whether pretreatment levels of NRP predict response to hormone therapy (HT). MATERIALS AND METHODS Circulating NRP levels were determined in 94 patients who participated in a randomized trial of three different doses of the antiestrogen, droloxifene (DRO), as first-line HT for metastatic breast cancer. RESULTS NRP levels were elevated (> or = 5,000 U/mL) in 32 of 94 patients (34%). Only three of 32 patients (9%) with elevated NRP levels responded to DRO, compared with 35 of 62 (56%) with nonelevated NRP levels (P = .00001). Low pretreatment NRP level was the most powerful predictor of response to DRO (odds ratio of response, 22.4; P = .0001). Elevated pretreatment NRP levels were also associated with a shorter time to progression (TTP) and survival duration. CONCLUSION Pretreatment circulating NRP levels predict a low likelihood of benefit from HT, specifically DRO, in patients with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive and/or progesterone receptor (PgR)-positive or receptor-unknown metastatic breast cancer, even when adjusted for other known predictive factors, such as ER and/or PgR levels, site of disease, disease-free interval from primary treatment to recurrence, and prior adjuvant chemotherapy. These data suggest that pretreatment NRP levels may be useful in deciding whether to treat a patient who otherwise appears to be likely to respond to HT.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document