Large fresh osteochondral allografts for the hip: growing the evidence

2017 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 284-290 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lasun O Oladeji ◽  
James L Cook ◽  
James P Stannard ◽  
Brett D Crist

Introduction: Articular cartilage lesions of the hip are difficult to effectively treat. Osteochondral allograft (OCA) transplantation in the knee has been associated with long-term success, but OCA for the hip has not been extensively studied. Here, we present the clinical and radiological outcomes from a cohort of 10 patients treated with fresh OCA transplants for large osteochondral defects of the femoral head and/or acetabulum. Methods: 10 patients who had undergone osteochondral allograft transplantation of the femoral head and/or acetabulum at our institution between 2013 and 2016 were identified from our Institutional Review Board-approved registry. Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS) was used to track patient progress. Results: 10 patients with an average clinical follow-up of 1.4 years were included in this study. 4 patients were treated solely with OCA plugs for femoral head defects, while the remaining 6 received femoral OCA plugs and at least 1 concomitant procedure for additional intraarticular pathology. 7 patients (70%) had successful functional outcomes, while 3 (30%) had unsuccessful outcomes and were subsequently converted to total hip arthroplasty (THA) 5 to 29 months after OCA. Conclusions: OCA transplantation can be an effective treatment strategy for young, healthy individuals with articular cartilage lesions of the hip. Smoking, avascular necrosis aetiology, acetabular involvement and concomitant procedures may be risk factors for unsuccessful outcomes necessitating salvage with THA. Long-term clinical studies to refine indications and determine functional outcomes and survival rates are warranted.

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 232596711876187 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph D. Lamplot ◽  
Kevin A. Schafer ◽  
Matthew J. Matava

Background: Symptomatic articular cartilage lesions of the knee are common and are being treated surgically with increasing frequency. While many studies have reported outcomes following a variety of cartilage restoration procedures, few have investigated outcomes of revision surgery after a failed attempt at cartilage repair or reconstruction. Purpose: To investigate outcomes of revision cartilage restoration procedures for symptomatic articular cartilage lesions of the knee following a previously failed cartilage reconstructive procedure. Study Design: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: A literature search was performed by use of the PubMed, EMBASE, and MEDLINE/Ovid databases for relevant articles published between 1975 and 2017 that evaluated patients undergoing revision cartilage restoration procedure(s) and reported outcomes using validated outcome measures. For studies meeting inclusion criteria, relevant information was extracted. Results: Ten studies met the inclusion criteria. Lesions most commonly occurred in the medial femoral condyle (MFC) (52.8%), with marrow stimulation techniques (MST) the index procedure most frequently performed (70.7%). Three studies demonstrated inferior outcomes of autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI) following a previous failed cartilage procedure compared with primary ACI. One study comparing osteochondral allograft (OCA) transplant following failed microfracture (MFX) with primary OCA transplant demonstrated similar clinical outcomes and graft survival at midterm follow-up. No studies reported outcomes following osteochondral autograft transfer (OAT) or newer techniques. Conclusion: This systematic review of the literature reporting outcomes following revision articular cartilage restoration procedures (most commonly involving the MFC) demonstrated a high proportion of patients who underwent prior MST. Evidence is sufficient to suggest that caution should be taken in performing ACI in the setting of prior MST, likely secondary to subchondral bone compromise. OCA appears to be a good revision treatment option even if the subchondral bone has been violated from prior surgery or fracture.


2017 ◽  
Vol 31 (06) ◽  
pp. 528-535 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Vangsness ◽  
Geoffrey Higgs ◽  
James Hoffman ◽  
Jack Farr ◽  
Philip Davidson ◽  
...  

AbstractRestoration and repair of articular cartilage injuries remain a challenge for orthopaedic surgeons. The standard first-line treatment of articular cartilage lesions is marrow stimulation; however, this procedure can often result in the generation of fibrous repair cartilage rather than the biomechanically superior hyaline cartilage. Marrow stimulation is also often limited to smaller lesions, less than 2 cm2. Larger lesions may require implantation of a fresh osteochondal allograft, though a short shelf life, size-matched donor requirements, potential challenges of bone healing, limited availability, and the relatively high price limit the wide use of this therapeutic approach. We present a straightforward, single-stage surgical technique of a novel reparative and restorative approach for articular cartilage repair with the implantation of a cryopreserved viable osteochondral allograft (CVOCA). The CVOCA contains full-thickness articular cartilage and a thin layer of subchondral bone, and maintains the intact native cartilage architecture with viable chondrocytes, growth factors, and extracellular matrix proteins to promote articular cartilage repair. We report the results of a retrospective case series of three patients who presented with articular cartilage lesions more than 2 cm2 and were treated with the CVOCA using the presented surgical technique. Patients were followed up to 2 years after implantation of the CVOCA and all three patients had satisfactory outcomes without adverse events. Controlled randomized studies are suggested for evaluation of CVOCA efficacy, safety, and long-term outcomes.


2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 363.2-363
Author(s):  
S. Trattnig ◽  
C. Scotti ◽  
D. Laurent ◽  
V. Juras ◽  
S. Hacker ◽  
...  

Background:LNA043 is a modified, recombinant version of the human angiopoietin-like 3 (ANGPTL3) protein acting directly on cartilage-resident cells to transmit its cartilage anabolic effect. A first-in-human study previously demonstrated the favourable safety profile and the modulation of several pathways involved in cartilage homeostasis and osteoarthritis (OA)1. A previous proof-of-mechanism imaging study used high field (7 Tesla) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to show formation of hyaline-like tissue after a single injection of 20 mg LNA043 (unpublished data).Objectives:To evaluate non-invasively the chondro-regenerative capacity of multiple intra-articular (i.a.) injections of LNA043 in patients with articular cartilage lesions in the knee (NCT03275064).Methods:This was a randomised, double-blind, placebo (PBO)-controlled, proof-of-concept study in patients with a partial thickness cartilage lesion. In total, 58 patients (43 [20 mg LNA043]; 15 [PBO]), stratified by lesion type (condylar or patellar) were treated with 4 weekly i.a. injections. The primary endpoint was T2 relaxation time measurement as a marker of collagen fiber network, and cartilage lesion-volume was a secondary endpoint, both using 3-Tesla MRI. Assessments were performed at baseline, weeks (wks) 8, 16, 28 and 52 (the latter in 23/58 patients). While lesion-volume for the secondary endpoint was determined from manually segmented images, the cartilage volume of 21 sub-regions spanning the entire knee was also measured from 3D isotropic MR images employing an automated segmentation prototype software (MR Chondral Health 2.1 [MRCH], Siemens Healthcare)2. An exploratory analysis evaluated the treatment effect for the additive volume of the 3 subregions in the weight-bearing area of the medial femur.Results:No change in T2 relaxation time was detected between treatment and PBO groups. Manual segmentation showed continuous filling of the cartilage lesions up to wk 28 in LNA043-treated patients with femoral lesions (p=0.08, vs PBO) while no effect was detected for patients with patellar lesions. Given the limitations of measuring small, irregularly shaped lesions with manual image-analysis, the MRCH approach was used (Figure 1). In the medial femoral weight-bearing region, refilling was detected over time (Δ=123 mm3 at wk 28, N= 37, p= 0.05). No overgrowth was detected in the lateral femoral condyles without cartilage damage. The overall safety profile was favourable; only mild/moderate local reactions were reported, including a higher incidence of joint swelling (9.3% vs 0%) and arthralgia (11.6% vs 6.7%) for LNA043 vs PBO resolving spontaneously or with paracetamol/NSAIDs. No anti-drug antibodies were detected.Conclusion:Treatment with 4 weekly i.a. injections of 20 mg LNA043 resulted in regeneration of damaged cartilage in patients with femoral articular cartilage lesions. Automated measurement of cartilage volume in the femoral index region was able to detect a relevant treatment effect and was found to be more sensitive than the manual segmentation method. No sign of cartilage overgrowth was observed in healthy femoral regions. A Phase 2b study in patients with mild to moderate knee OA is in preparation.References:[1]Scotti et al. ACR Convergence 2020; Abstract #1483[2]Juras et al. Cartilage 2020; Sep 29:1-12Disclosure of Interests:Siegfried Trattnig: None declared, Celeste Scotti Shareholder of: Novartis, Employee of: Novartis, Didier Laurent Shareholder of: Novartis, Employee of: Novartis, Vladimir Juras: None declared, Scott Hacker Grant/research support from: Novartis, Brian Cole: None declared, Libor Pasa: None declared, Roman Lehovec: None declared, Pavol Szomolanyi: None declared, Esther Raithel Employee of: Siemens Healthcare GmbH, Franziska Saxer Shareholder of: Novartis, Employee of: Novartis, Jens Praestgaard Shareholder of: Novartis, Employee of: Novartis, Fabiola La Gamba Shareholder of: Novartis, Employee of: Novartis, José L. Jiménez Employee of: Novartis, David Sanchez Ramos Shareholder of: Novartis, Employee of: Novartis, Ronenn Roubenoff Shareholder of: Novartis, Employee of: Novartis, Matthias Schieker Shareholder of: Novartis, Employee of: Novartis


1998 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 227-233 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. L. K. Fu ◽  
N. Maffulli ◽  
K. M. H. Yip ◽  
K. M. Chan

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document