Influence of Cigarette Smoking on Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head (ONFH): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2017 ◽  
Vol 27 (5) ◽  
pp. 425-435 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhenxing Wen ◽  
Zan Lin ◽  
Wenlong Yan ◽  
Jian Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Femoral Head ◽  
Cigarette Smoking ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Case Control Studies ◽  
Random Effects Models ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Newcastle Ottawa Scale ◽  
Former Smokers ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Heavy Smokers

Background Current studies demonstrate controversy regarding the relationship between cigarette smoking and osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH). Methods We conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the association between smoking and ONFH. Relevant articles published before September 2016 were identified by a systematic search of EMBASE and MEDLINE via Ovid. Summary odds ratios (OR) were calculated using random effects models, and study quality was assessed using a modified Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Results 102 citations were screened and 7 case-control studies were identified and included in the review. When compared with nonsmokers, current smokers had a higher risk of developing ONFH (OR 2.53; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.68-3.79), as did former smokers (OR 1.82; 95% CI, 1.10-3.00). Within the group of current smokers, those classified as heavy smokers (with a daily number >20 cigarettes/day) demonstrated higher risks of ONFH (OR 2.03; 95% CI, 1.29-3.19), and light smokers classified as smoking <20 cigarettes/day, also demonstrated a higher risk of ONFH when compared with nonsmokers (OR 1.73; 95% CI, 1.06-2.83). When smoking was classified by pack-years, heavy smokers (>20 pack-years) were at a higher risk of ONFH (OR 2.26; 95% CI, 1.24-4.13), but no significant difference in risk was identified in light smokers (<20 pack-years) (OR 1.81; 95% CI, 0.88-3.71) when compared with nonsmokers. Conclusions Our meta-analysis showed that current smokers were at a higher risk of ONFH, this high risk can also be found in former smokers. And heavy cigarette smoking showed a higher risk of ONFH than light smoking.

Appendectomy Does Not Increase the Risk of Future Emergence of Parkinson’s Disease: A Meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
pp. 000313482198903
Author(s):  
Mitsuru Ishizuka ◽  
Norisuke Shibuya ◽  
Kazutoshi Takagi ◽  
Hiroyuki Hachiya ◽  
Kazuma Tago ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Parkinson’S Disease ◽  
Parkinson's Disease ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Random Effects Models ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Cochrane Library ◽  
The Impact ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Observation Period

Objective To explore the impact of appendectomy history on emergence of Parkinson’s disease (PD). Background Although there are several studies to investigate the relationship between appendectomy history and emergence of PD, the results are still controversial. Methods We performed a comprehensive electronic search of the literature (the Cochrane Library, PubMed, and the Web of Science) up to April 2020 to identify studies that had employed databases allowing comparison of emergence of PD between patients with and those without appendectomy history. To integrate the impact of appendectomy history on emergence of PD, a meta-analysis was performed using random-effects models to calculate the risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for the selected studies, and heterogeneity was analyzed using I2 statistics. Results Four studies involving a total of 6 080 710 patients were included in this meta-analysis. Among 1 470 613 patients with appendectomy history, 1845 (.13%) had emergences of PD during the observation period, whereas among 4 610 097 patients without appendectomy history, 6743 (.15%) had emergences of PD during the observation period. These results revealed that patients with appendectomy history and without appendectomy had almost the same emergence of PD (RR, 1.02; 95% CI, .87-1.20; P = .83; I2 = 87%). Conclusion This meta-analysis has demonstrated that there was no significant difference in emergence of PD between patients with and those without appendectomy history.

scholarly journals Serum level of IL-10 and IL-10-1082G/A polymorphism are associated with the risk of ischemic stroke: A meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaodong Rui ◽  
Yeqin Sha ◽  
Shuang Wen ◽  
Qingyang Sun ◽  
Jingming Hu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Serum Level ◽  
Ethnic Groups ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Interleukin 10 ◽  
Case Control Studies ◽  
Chinese Han ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Newcastle Ottawa Scale ◽  
The Relationship

Abstract BACKGROUND Stroke is one of the leading causes of disability and mortality among adults worldwide. The aim of the study was to confirm the relationship of serum interleukin-10 (IL-10) and its gene polymorphism with the risk of ischemic stroke (IS). METHODS PubMed and China Wanfang database were systematically searched up to September 2, 2019. Studies illustrating on the association between serum IL-10 or IL-10-1082G/A, IL-10-819C/T, IL-10- 592C/A polymorphisms and IS susceptibility were included in this study. Newcastle–Ottawa scale was used to assess the study quality. RevMan 5.3 was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Seventeen case-control studies were included in this meta-analysis which provides 3754 patients with IS and 5064 controls. Combined analysis indicated that patients with IS had lower serum level of IL-10 (Mean difference [MD]: -4.25; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -6.14 to -2.36, p<0.0001). An association was identified between IL-10-1082G/A polymorphism and the risk of IS, but no association was found between polymorphism of IL-10-819C/T or IL-10- 592C/A and the risk of IS when all ethnic groups were considered together. For IL-10-1082G/A polymorphism, individuals with AA-genotype might have an increased risk of IS among Chinese Han population while no such correlation was observed in other ethnic group. CONCLUSION This meta-analysis suggested that low serum level of IL-10 and IL-10-1082G/A polymorphism may be associated with the risk of IS. More clinical studies should be conducted to confirm the relationship between serum IL-10 level and the risk of IS in all ethnic groups.

Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma and Smoking: A Meta-Analysis of Case-Control Studies

Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 5292-5292 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cannon Milani ◽  
Sheila Pascual ◽  
Joanna Mitri ◽  
Jorge Castillo
Keyword(s):  
Viral Infections ◽  
Case Reports ◽  
English Literature ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Case Control ◽  
Case Control Studies ◽  
Random Effects Models ◽  
Non Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
The Relationship

Abstract Background: The incidence of non-Hodgkins lymphoma (NHL) has followed a sustained increasing pattern for the last few decades. Potential factors implicated in developing an increased risk for NHL include immunosuppression, bacterial, and viral infections. The pathological heterogeneity of NHL suggests multifactorial etiologies. Several reports around the world have linked lifestyle habits to the development of NHL, but thus far, the relationship between smoking and NHL has been largely inconclusive. Objective: To perform a meta-analysis of published case-control studies to clarify the potential relationship between smoking and the development of NHL. Methods: An English literature search was conducted using Pubmed of case-control studies investigating the relationship between smoking and development of NHL. Prospective studies, case reports, editorials and letters were not included. Data were gathered including the following variables: country of origin, source of cases and controls, number of female/male cases and controls, adjusted odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for former and current smokers, divided by male/female when available, and adjustments. Effect measures were obtained trough fixed and random-effects models to assess for heterogeneity. Results: Eighteen case-control studies were included in the meta-analysis. A total of 22,226 cases and 30,792 controls were finally analyzed. Based on our meta-analysis, former smokers had an OR of 1.02 (95% CI, 0.92 – 1.12) when compared to never smokers; heterogeneity between studies was evident (p &lt; 0.001; I2 = 75.3%). Current smokers, on the other hand, had an OR of 1.06 (95% CI, 1.00 – 1.14); some degree of heterogeneity was observed (p = 0.04; I2 = 41.1%). Conclusions: Despite the limitations of this meta-analysis, current smokers seem to have small but statistically significant increase in the risk of developing NHL. Clinically speaking, smoking may be a non-negligible risk factor for developing NHL. Although a causal relationship will be hard to prove, further research is needed to clarify the potential role of smoking in lymphomagenesis.

Postoperative Complications Associated With Intra- Versus Extracorporeal Anastomosis for Laparoscopic Right Colectomy

2021 ◽  
pp. 000313482110234
Author(s):  
Mitsuru Ishizuka ◽  
Norisuke Shibuya ◽  
Kazutoshi Takagi ◽  
Hiroyuki Hachiya ◽  
Kazuma Tago ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Complications ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Intracorporeal Anastomosis ◽  
Right Colectomy ◽  
Case Control Studies ◽  
Random Effects Models ◽  
Laparoscopic Right Colectomy ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Extracorporeal Anastomosis ◽  
Reduced Risk

Objective To compare the postoperative complications of intracorporeal anastomosis (ICA) and extracorporeal anastomosis (ECA) in patients undergoing laparoscopic right colectomy (LRC). Background Although several studies have compared postoperative complications of ICA and ECA after LRC, most were retrospective studies. Methods We performed a comprehensive electronic search of the literature to identify studies that compared postoperative complications between ICA and ECA in patients who underwent LRC. We performed meta-analysis using random-effects models to calculate the risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of experiencing complications, and we analyzed heterogeneity using I2 statistics. Results Fifteen studies consist of randomized controlled trials, case-control studies, and propensity score matching studies involving a total of 3219 patients who underwent LRC were included. Among 1377 patients who received ICA, 255 (18.5%) had postoperative complications, whereas among 1652 patients who received ECA, 373 (22.6%) had such complications. The results of the meta-analysis revealed that ICA was associated with a significantly reduced risk of postoperative complications (RR, .73; 95% CI: .57-.95; P = .02; I2 = 57%) compared with ECA. Although there was no significant difference between the 2 groups in risk of anastomotic leakage (RR, .67; 95% CI: .39-1.17; P = .16; I2 = 8%), there was a significant difference between them in risk of surgical site infection (RR, .50; 95% CI: .34-.71; P = .0002; I2 = 0%). Conclusions Intracorporeal anastomosis is associated with a reduced risk of postoperative complications compared with ECA in patients undergoing LRC.

scholarly journals An updated analysis of opioids increasing the risk of fractures

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qiaoning Yue ◽  
Yue Ma ◽  
Yirong Teng ◽  
Yun Zhu ◽  
Hao Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Studies ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Opioid Therapy ◽  
Case Control ◽  
Case Control Studies ◽  
Chronic Noncancer Pain ◽  
Newcastle Ottawa Scale ◽  
Noncancer Pain ◽  
The Relationship

AbstractObjectiveTo assess the relationship between opioid therapy for chronic noncancer pain and fracture risk by a meta-analysis of cohort studies and case-control studies.MethodsThe included cohort studies and case-control studies were identified by searching the PubMed and EMBASE databases from their inception until May 24, 2019. The outcome of interest was a fracture. This information was independently screened by two authors. When the heterogeneity among studies was significant, a random effects model was used to determine the overall combined risk estimate.ResultsIn total, 12 cohort studies and 6 case-control studies were included. We used the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) to evaluate the quality of the included literature, and 14 of the studies were considered high-quality studies. The overall relative risk of opioid therapy and fractures was 1.78 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.53 - 2.07). Subgroup analyses revealed sources of heterogeneity, sensitivity analysis was stable, and no publication bias was observed.ConclusionsThe meta-analysis showed that the use of opioids significantly increased the risk of fracture.

scholarly journals Association of bisphenol A with puberty timing: a meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hui Meng ◽  
Yunping Zhou ◽  
Yunxia Jiang
Keyword(s):  
Bisphenol A ◽  
Confidence Intervals ◽  
Random Effects ◽  
Strong Correlation ◽  
Fixed Effects ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Random Effects Models ◽  
Study Heterogeneity ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Prevalence Ratios

AbstractObjectivesThe results of existing studies on bisphenol A (BPA) and puberty timing did not reach a consensus. Thereby we performed this meta-analytic study to explore the association between BPA exposure in urine and puberty timing.MethodsMeta-analysis of the pooled odds ratios (OR), prevalence ratios (PR) or hazards ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated and estimated using fixed-effects or random-effects models based on between-study heterogeneity.ResultsA total of 10 studies involving 5621 subjects were finally included. The meta-analysis showed that BPA exposure was weakly associated with thelarche (PR: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.93–0.99), while no association was found between BPA exposure and menarche (HR: 0.99, 95% CI: 0.89–1.12; OR: 1.02, 95% CI: 0.73–1.43), and pubarche (OR: 1.00, 95% CI: 0.79–1.26; PR: 1.00, 95% CI: 0.95–1.05).ConclusionsThere was no strong correlation between BPA exposure and puberty timing. Further studies with large sample sizes are needed to verify the relationship between BPA and puberty timing.

scholarly journals Effect of somatometric parameters on the prevalence and severity of varicocele: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Runqing Li ◽  
Junjie Liu ◽  
Yushan Li ◽  
Quanxian Wang
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
China National Knowledge Infrastructure ◽  
Random Effects Models ◽  
Knowledge Infrastructure ◽  
Regression Test ◽  
Mean Differences ◽  
Q Statistic ◽  
The Relationship

Abstract Background Published studies have shown contradictory results regarding the relationship between somatometric parameters and varicoceles. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the possible effects of age, height, weight, and body mass index (BMI) on the presence and severity of varicoceles. Methods Databases including EMBASE, MEDLINE, PubMed, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Web of Science, and Google Scholar were systematically searched to identify relevant articles published up to March 2020. Two researchers independently identified eligible articles and extracted data. Cochran’s Q statistic and I2 statistics were used to assess heterogeneity. Meta-analysis was performed using StataSE 12.0 software (StataCorp LP, USA). Random-effects models were used to obtain the weighted mean differences (WMDs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Publication bias was assessed using Begg’s funnel plot and Egger’s regression test. Results The search strategy produced 272 articles, of which 18 articles were eligible according to the inclusion/exclusion criteria. A total of 56,325 patients with varicocele and 1,334,694 patients without varicocele were included in the meta-analysis to evaluate the effect of somatometric parameters on the presence and severity of varicocele. The overall results demonstrated that the presence of varicoceles was significantly associated with height (WMD = 1.41, 95% CI = 1.07 to 1.74, P < 0.001) and inversely correlated with BMI (WMD = − 1.35, 95% CI = -1.67 to − 1.03, P < 0.001) but not with age (WMD = -0.93, 95% CI = -2.19 to 0.33, P = 0.149) or weight (WMD = 0.24, 95% CI = -2.24 to 2.72, P = 0.850). The severity of varicocele was inversely correlated with increased BMI but not with age. Conclusion The presence of varicoceles was significantly associated with height and inversely correlated with BMI.

scholarly journals Running and Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

2016 ◽  
Vol 45 (6) ◽  
pp. 1447-1457 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kate A. Timmins ◽  
Richard D. Leech ◽  
Mark E. Batt ◽  
Kimberley L. Edwards
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Full Text ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Positive Association ◽  
Case Control ◽  
Case Control Studies ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Knee Oa ◽  
Knee Joint Surgery ◽  
Newcastle Ottawa Scale

Background: Osteoarthritis (OA) is a chronic condition characterized by pain, impaired function, and reduced quality of life. A number of risk factors for knee OA have been identified, such as obesity, occupation, and injury. The association between knee OA and physical activity or particular sports such as running is less clear. Previous reviews, and the evidence that informs them, present contradictory or inconclusive findings. Purpose: This systematic review aimed to determine the association between running and the development of knee OA. Study Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods: Four electronic databases were searched, along with citations in eligible articles and reviews and the contents of recent journal issues. Two reviewers independently screened the titles and abstracts using prespecified eligibility criteria. Full-text articles were also independently assessed for eligibility. Eligible studies were those in which running or running-related sports (eg, triathlon or orienteering) were assessed as a risk factor for the onset or progression of knee OA in adults. Relevant outcomes included (1) diagnosis of knee OA, (2) radiographic markers of knee OA, (3) knee joint surgery for OA, (4) knee pain, and (5) knee-associated disability. Risk of bias was judged by use of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed with case-control studies investigating arthroplasty. Results: After de-duplication, the search returned 1322 records. Of these, 153 full-text articles were assessed; 25 were eligible, describing 15 studies: 11 cohort (6 retrospective) and 4 case-control studies. Findings of studies with a diagnostic OA outcome were mixed. Some radiographic differences were observed in runners, but only at baseline within some subgroups. Meta-analysis suggested a protective effect of running against surgery due to OA: pooled odds ratio 0.46 (95% CI, 0.30-0.71). The I2 was 0% (95% CI, 0%-73%). Evidence relating to symptomatic outcomes was sparse and inconclusive. Conclusion: With this evidence, it is not possible to determine the role of running in knee OA. Moderate- to low-quality evidence suggests no association with OA diagnosis, a positive association with OA diagnosis, and a negative association with knee OA surgery. Conflicting results may reflect methodological heterogeneity. More evidence from well-designed, prospective studies is needed to clarify the contradictions.

scholarly journals The association between Helicobacter pylori and obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis of case–control studies

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali Baradaran ◽  
Hojat Dehghanbanadaki ◽  
Sara Naderpour ◽  
Leila Mohammadi Pirkashani ◽  
Abdolhalim Rajabi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Pooled Analysis ◽  
Case Control ◽  
Case Control Studies ◽  
Newcastle Ottawa Scale ◽  
Prevalence Of Obesity ◽  
Quantitative Analyses ◽  
H Pylori

Abstract Introduction The relationship between H. pylori infection and obesity development has remained controversial among various studies. The aim of this study was to clarify the pooled effect of H. pylori infection on the development of obesity and vice versa. Methods We searched international databases including Medline (PubMed), Web of sciences, Scopus, EMBASE, Cochrane, Ovid, and CINHAL to retrieve all case–control studies reporting the effect of H. pylori on obesity and vice versa, which had been published in English between January 1990 and June 2019. The quality of included studies was assessed by the Modified Newcastle–Ottawa Scale for Case–Control studies. The logarithm of the odds ratio (OR) and its standard error was used for the meta-analysis. Results Eight case–control studies with 25,519 participants were included for qualitative and quantitative analyses. The pooled analysis showed that obese participants had a higher risk of H. pylori infection than lean participants with an odds ratio of 1.46 (95%CI: 1.26, 1.68). Also, the pooled analysis revealed that participants infected by H. pylori had a higher risk of obesity than non-infected participants with an odds ratio of 1.01 (95%CI: 1.01, 1.02). Conclusion The results of this meta-analysis showed that there was a positive correlation between the risk of H. pylori infection and the prevalence of obesity development. Thus, H. pylori positive patients were more likely to be obese, and obese individuals had higher risks of H. pylori infection.

scholarly journals Association of dyslipidemia with the severity and mortality of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): a meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yanli Liu ◽  
Yilong Pan ◽  
Yuyao Yin ◽  
Wenhao Chen ◽  
Xiaodong Li
Keyword(s):  
Fixed Effects ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Case Control Studies ◽  
Risk Of Death ◽  
Potential Association ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Language Restriction ◽  
Newcastle Ottawa Scale

Abstract Background The numbers of confirmed cases of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and COVID-19 related deaths are still increasing, so it is very important to determine the risk factors of COVID-19. Dyslipidemia is a common complication in patients with COVID-19, but the association of dyslipidemia with the severity and mortality of COVID-19 is still unclear. The aim of this study is to analyze the potential association of dyslipidemia with the severity and mortality of COVID-19. Methods We searched the PubMed, Embase, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Library databases for all relevant studies up to August 24, 2020. All the articles published were retrieved without language restriction. All analysis was performed using Stata 13.1 software and Mantel–Haenszel formula with fixed effects models was used to compare the differences between studies. The Newcastle Ottawa scale was used to assess the quality of the included studies. Results Twenty-eight studies involving 12,995 COVID-19 patients were included in the meta-analysis, which was consisted of 26 cohort studies and 2 case–control studies. Dyslipidemia was associated with the severity of COVID-19 (odds ratio [OR] = 1.27, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.11–1.44, P = 0.038, I2 = 39.8%). Further, patients with dyslipidemia had a 2.13-fold increased risk of death compared to patients without dyslipidemia (95% CI 1.84–2.47, P = 0.001, I2 = 66.4%). Conclusions The results proved that dyslipidemia is associated with increased severity and mortality of COVID-19. Therefore, we should monitor blood lipids and administer active treatments in COVID-19 patients with dyslipidemia to reduce the severity and mortality.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document