Comparative Survival Analysis of Porous Tantalum and Porous Titanium Acetabular Components in Total Hip Arthroplasty

2017 ◽  
Vol 27 (5) ◽  
pp. 505-508 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emil S. Vutescu ◽  
Peter Hsiue ◽  
Wayne Paprosky ◽  
Sumon Nandi
Keyword(s):  
Survival Analysis ◽  
Acetabular Component ◽  
Porous Metal ◽  
Porous Titanium ◽  
Acetabular Defect ◽  
Porous Tantalum ◽  
Revision Tha ◽  
Paprosky Classification ◽  
Acetabular Components

Background Porous tantalum acetabular components (PoTa) are well-studied, but less is known about widely used porous titanium (PoTi) acetabular components. We performed a comparative survival analysis between PoTi and PoTa acetabular components. Methods Primary or revision THA performed using PoTi (n = 2,976) or PoTa (n = 184) acetabular components with minimum 2-year follow-up (PoTi n = 1,539; PoTa n = 157) were analysed. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were performed to test the effect of porous metal acetabular component type on revision surgery for aseptic cup loosening. Multivariate model was adjusted for acetabular defect severity according to the Paprosky Classification. Results Only PoTi components used in revision THA failed. Survival of the PoTi acetabular component was 98.6% when used in revision THA at mean 48.3-month follow-up. After adjusting for severity of acetabular defect, there was no difference in survival between PoTi and PoTa acetabular components when used in primary or revision THA. Conclusions After adjusting for acetabular defect severity, both PoTa and PoTi acetabular components had excellent survival at mean 44.4-month (range 4.3-91.5 months) follow-up when used in primary and revision THA.

scholarly journals Comparison of the stability of three fixation techniques between porous metal acetabular components and augments

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 282-288 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. A. Beckmann ◽  
R. G. Bitsch ◽  
M. Gondan ◽  
M. Schonhoff ◽  
S. Jaeger
Keyword(s):  
Acetabular Component ◽  
Screw Fixation ◽  
Porous Metal ◽  
Porous Titanium ◽  
Relative Movement ◽  
Fixation Methods ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Fixation Techniques ◽  
The Stability ◽  
Acetabular Components

Objectives In order to address acetabular defects, porous metal revision acetabular components and augments have been developed, which require fixation to each other. The fixation technique that results in the smallest relative movement between the components, as well as its influence on the primary stability with the host bone, have not previously been determined. Methods A total of 18 composite hemipelvises with a Paprosky IIB defect were implanted using a porous titanium 56 mm multihole acetabular component and 1 cm augment. Each acetabular component and augment was affixed to the bone using two screws, while the method of fixation between the acetabular component and augment varied for the three groups of six hemipelvises: group S, screw fixation only; group SC, screw plus cement fixation; group C, cement fixation only. The implanted hemipelvises were cyclically loaded to three different loading maxima (0.5 kN, 0.9 kN, and 1.8 kN). Results Screw fixation alone resulted in up to three times more movement (p = 0.006), especially when load was increased to 100% (p < 0.001), than with the other two fixation methods (C and SC). No significant difference was noted when a screw was added to the cement fixation. Increased load resulted in increased relative movement between the interfaces in all fixation methods (p < 0.001). Conclusion Cement fixation between a porous titanium acetabular component and augment is associated with less relative movement than screw fixation alone for all implant interfaces, particularly with increasing loads. Adding a screw to the cement fixation did not offer any significant advantage. These results also show that the stability of the tested acetabular component/augment interface affects the stability of the construct that is affixed to the bone. Cite this article: N. A. Beckmann, R. G. Bitsch, M. Gondan, M. Schonhoff, S. Jaeger. Comparison of the stability of three fixation techniques between porous metal acetabular components and augments. Bone Joint Res 2018;7:282–288. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.74.BJR-2017-0198.R1.

Radiolucent lines do not affect the longevity of highly cross-linked polyethylene cemented components in total hip arthroplasty

2021 ◽  
Vol 103-B (10) ◽  
pp. 1604-1610
Author(s):  
Yusuke Takaoka ◽  
Koji Goto ◽  
Jiro Tamura ◽  
Yaichiro Okuzu ◽  
Toshiyuki Kawai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Femoral Head ◽  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Acetabular Component ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Long Term Outcome ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
Radiolucent Lines ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Acetabular Components

Aims We aimed to evaluate the long-term outcome of highly cross-linked polyethylene (HXLPE) cemented acetabular components and assess whether any radiolucent lines (RLLs) which arose were progressive. Methods We retrospectively reviewed 170 patients who underwent 187 total hip arthroplasties at two hospitals with a minimum follow-up of ten years. All interventions were performed using the same combination of HXLPE cemented acetabular components with femoral stems made of titanium alloy. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed for the primary endpoint of acetabular component revision surgery for any reason and secondary endpoint of the appearance of RLLs. RLLs that had appeared once were observed over time. We statistically assessed potential relationships between RLLs and a number of factors, including the technique of femoral head autografting and the Japanese Orthopaedic Association score. Results The mean follow-up period was 13.0 years (10.0 to 16.3). Femoral head autografting was performed on 135 hips (72.2%). One acetabular component was retrieved because of deep infection. No revision was performed for the aseptic acetabular loosening. The Kaplan-Meier survival curve for the primary and secondary endpoints were 98.2% (95% confidence interval (CI) 88.6% to 99.8%) and 79.3% (95% CI 72.8% to 84.6%), respectively. RLLs were detected in 38 hips (21.2%), at a mean of 1.7 years (1 month to 6 years) postoperatively. None of the RLLs were progressive, and the presence of RLLs did not show a significant association with the survival and clinical score. RLLs were more frequently observed in hips without femoral head autografts than in those with autografts. Conclusion The use of HXLPE cemented acetabular components in total hip arthroplasty demonstrated excellent clinical outcomes after ten years, and no RLLs were progressive, and their presence did not affect the outcome. Femoral head autografting did not negatively impact the acetabular component survival or the appearance of RLLs. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(10):1604–1610.

Preliminary results of a 3D-printed acetabular component in the management of extensive defects

2017 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 266-271 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mustafa Citak ◽  
Lilly Kochsiek ◽  
Thorsten Gehrke ◽  
Carl Haasper ◽  
Eduardo M Suero ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Loss ◽  
Acetabular Component ◽  
Complication Rate ◽  
Primary Outcome Measure ◽  
Patient Specific ◽  
Component Technique ◽  
Revision Tha ◽  
3D Printed ◽  
Acetabular Defects ◽  
Acetabular Components

Introduction: The treatment of extensive bone loss and massive acetabular defects can be compounded by several challenges and pitfalls. The survivorship following acetabular revision with extensive bone loss is still unsatisfactory. The goal of the present study was to analyse the outcomes of 3D-printed patient-specific acetabular components in the management of extensive acetabular defects and combined pelvic discontinuity (PD). Methods: 9 patients underwent revision THA using 3D-printed custom acetabular components to reconstruct extensive acetabular defects. The Paprosky classifications were determined in all patients. The primary outcome measure was the implant-associated failure rate. Results: 1 out of 9 patients suffered an implant-associated complication (11%). The overall implant-associated survival rate was 89%. The overall complication rate was 56%. Conclusions: The patient-specific acetabular component technique shows promise for the treatment of patients with severe acetabular defects in revision THA. Further research aimed at reducing costs and improving the complication rate are warranted.

scholarly journals Salvaging Unstable or Recurrent Dislocating Total Hip Arthroplasty with the Constrained Acetabular Component

2002 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 165-169 ◽  
Author(s):  
DA Stanton ◽  
WJ Bruce ◽  
JA Goldberg ◽  
W Walsh
Keyword(s):  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Acetabular Component ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Recurrent Dislocation ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
Hip Replacements ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Acetabular Components ◽  
Constrained Acetabular Component

Purpose. To review cases of implantation of constraining acetabular components for unstable or recurrent dislocating total hip arthroplasty at the Department of Orthopaedics, Concord Hospital, Sydney. Methods. A retrospective analysis was performed on prospectively collected data of 13 consecutively enrolled patients. Results. From 1989 to 2000, 13 constraining acetabular components were implanted into 13 patients as a revision procedure. The surgical approach for the implantation of the constrained liner was posterolateral in 11 cases; a modified Hardinge approach was applied in 2 cases. The mean clinical follow-up duration was 43 months (range, 14–121 months) and the mean age at the time of surgery was 73 years (range, 52–84 years). No patients were lost to follow-up. Indications for using the constrained acetabular component were recurrent dislocation in revision hip replacements (n=8), and intra-operative instability (n=5). There were no episodes of dislocation of the constrained arthroplasty. In 7 cases, the constrained component was implanted into a previously well-fixed shell. Conclusion. We recommend the judicious use of the constrained component in cases of hip instability during or after total hip arthroplasty when other methods are not successful.

Radiographic assessment of the dynasty biofoam acetabular component with a minimum 2 years follow-up

2020 ◽  
pp. 112070002095869
Author(s):  
Alberto V Carli ◽  
Romain Galmiche ◽  
Johanna Dobransky ◽  
Paul E Beaulé
Keyword(s):  
Acetabular Component ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Femur Fracture ◽  
Stress Shielding ◽  
Interference Fit ◽  
Implant Survivorship ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Aseptic Revision ◽  
Acetabular Components

Introduction: Acetabular components utilising novel ultraporous metal matrices have been recently introduced into clinical practice with improved interference fit, decreased stress shielding, and hope for more reliable osseointegration. 1 such example is the Dynasty Biofoam cup, which has been in clinical use for over a decade but has few reports documenting its clinical and radiographic performance. Methods: A single-centre retrospective study was performed evaluating 96 Dynasty Biofoam acetabular components implanted between March 2010 and August 2014 with minimum 2-year radiographic follow-up. Patients that received components for revision surgery or that had early complications postoperatively (femur fracture, prosthetic infection) were excluded. Biofoam patients were compared to 96 patients that received the Trident PSL acetabular component and were matched for age, gender, and BMI. Patient reported outcomes, component position and radiographic features of cup loosening, including radiolucent lines and sclerosis were compared among groups. Results: Patient-reported outcomes at 2 years were similar among groups. Cup anteversion was similar but inclination was significantly greater in the Biofoam group ( p = 0.006). A significantly greater number of Biofoam components exhibited 2-zone (27.2%) and 3-zone (12.0%) radiolucencies compared to 0% of the Trident shells ( p < 0.05). 2 Biofoam cups were revised for aseptic loosening compared to no Trident cups ( p = 0.49). Discussion: Despite adequate implant survivorship, over a quarter of Biofoam cups had 2 or more radiolucent zones in early follow-up. Longer follow-up is needed to determine if the aseptic revision rate for this cup will increase.

Is there a problem with modular dual mobility acetabular components in revision total hip arthroplasty at mid-term follow-up?

2021 ◽  
Vol 103-B (7 Supple B) ◽  
pp. 66-72
Author(s):  
Nicholas M. Hernandez ◽  
Zoe W. Hinton ◽  
Christine J. Wu ◽  
Paul F. Lachiewicz ◽  
Sean P. Ryan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Acetabular Revision ◽  
Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Dual Mobility ◽  
Revision Thas ◽  
Revision Tha ◽  
Acetabular Components ◽  
Acetabular Loosening

Aims Modular dual mobility (MDM) acetabular components are often used with the aim of reducing the risk of dislocation in revision total hip arthroplasty (THA). There is, however, little information in the literature about its use in this context. The aim of this study, therefore, was to evaluate the outcomes in a cohort of patients in whom MDM components were used at revision THA, with a mean follow-up of more than five years. Methods Using the database of a single academic centre, 126 revision THAs in 117 patients using a single design of an MDM acetabular component were retrospectively reviewed. A total of 94 revision THAs in 88 patients with a mean follow-up of 5.5 years were included in the study. Survivorship was analyzed with the endpoints of dislocation, reoperation for dislocation, acetabular revision for aseptic loosening, and acetabular revision for any reason. The secondary endpoints were surgical complications and the radiological outcome. Results The overall rate of dislocation was 11%, with a six-year survival of 91%. Reoperation for dislocation was performed in seven patients (7%), with a six-year survival of 94%. The dislocations were early (at a mean of 33 days) in six patients, and late (at a mean of 4.3 years) in four patients. There were three intraprosthetic dissociations. An outer head diameter of ≥ 48 mm was associated with a lower risk of dislocation (p = 0.013). Lumbrosacral fusion was associated with increased dislocation (p = 0.004). Four revision THAs (4%) were further revised for aseptic acetabular loosening, and severe bone loss (Paprosky III) at the time of the initial revision was significantly associated with further revision for aseptic acetabular loosening (p = 0.008). Fourteen acetabular components (15%) were re-revised for infection, and a pre-revision diagnosis of reimplantation after periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) was associated with subsequent PJI (p < 0.001). Two THAs had visible metallic changes on the backside of the cobalt chromium liner. Conclusion When using this MDM component in revision THA, at a mean follow-up of 5.5 years, there was a higher rate of dislocation (11%) than previously reported. The size of the outer bearing was related to the risk of dislocation. There was a low rate of aseptic acetabular loosening. Longer follow-up of this MDM component and evaluation of other designs are warranted. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(7 Supple B):66–72.

Clinical and radiographic evaluation of total hip arthroplasties using porous tantalum modular acetabular components: 5-year follow-up of clinical trial

2013 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 112-118 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yasuharu Nakashima ◽  
Naohiko Mashima ◽  
Hiroshi Imai ◽  
Naoto Mitsugi ◽  
Naoya Taki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Radiographic Evaluation ◽  
Porous Tantalum ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
Hip Arthroplasties ◽  
Acetabular Components

scholarly journals Second-generation uncemented total hip arthroplasty: a minimum 20-year follow-up

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 33-39
Author(s):  
Jeffrey R. McLaughlin ◽  
Kyla R. Lee ◽  
Mary Ann Johnson
Keyword(s):  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Aseptic Loosening ◽  
Femoral Component ◽  
Acetabular Component ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Second Generation ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
Uncemented Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Acetabular Components

Aims We present the clinical and radiological results at a minimum follow-up of 20 years using a second-generation uncemented total hip arthroplasty (THA). These results are compared to our previously published results using a first-generation hip arthroplasty followed for 20 years. Methods A total of 62 uncemented THAs in 60 patients were performed between 1993 and 1994. The titanium femoral component used in all cases was a Taperloc with a reduced distal stem. The acetabular component was a fully porous coated threaded hemispheric titanium shell (T-Tap ST). The outcome of every femoral and acetabular component with regard to retention or revision was determined for all 62 THAs. Complete clinical follow-up at a minimum of 20 years was obtained on every living patient. Radiological follow-up was obtained on all but one. Results Two femoral components (3.2%) required revision. One stem was revised secondary to a periprosthetic fracture one year postoperatively and one was revised for late sepsis. No femoral component was revised for aseptic loosening. Six acetabular components had required revision, five for aseptic loosening. One additional acetabular component was revised for sepsis. Radiologically, all femoral components remained well fixed. One acetabular was judged loose by radiological criteria. The mean Harris Hip Score improved from 46 points (30 to 67) preoperatively to 89 points (78 to 100) at final follow-up. With revision for aseptic loosening as the endpoint, survival of the acetabular component was 95% (95% confidence interval (CI) 90 to 98) at 25 years. Femoral component survival was 100%. Conclusion The most significant finding of this report was the low prevalence of aseptic loosening and revision of the femoral component at a mean follow-up of 22 years. A second important finding was the survival of over 90% of the hemispheric threaded ring acetabular components. While these shells remain controversial, in this series they performed well. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(1):33–39.

scholarly journals Revision hip arthroplasty using a porous tantalum acetabular component

2020 ◽  
pp. 112070002091329
Author(s):  
Hannu JA Miettinen ◽  
Simo SA Miettinen ◽  
Jukka S Kettunen ◽  
Jussi Jalkanen ◽  
Heikki Kröger
Keyword(s):  
Survival Analysis ◽  
Acetabular Component ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Revision Surgery ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Revision Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Cumulative Proportion ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
The Mean

Introduction: Reconstruction of acetabulum in case of bone defects can be challenging. The aim of this retrospective study was to investigate the 10-year survival of trabecular tantalum metal (TM) acetabulum component in revision hip arthroplasty operations and to evaluate complications. Methods: A total of 100 consecutive acetabulum revision hip arthroplasties (100 patients) were operated on between May 2004 and October 2006 at Kuopio University Hospital. The mean follow-up time was 9.4 years and the median was 11.5 years (SD 4.118; range 0.1–13.4 years). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed to study the survival of patients to re-revision surgery. Intra- and postoperative complications and reasons for re-revision were evaluated. Results: The Kaplan-Meier analysis showed a cumulative proportion of revision hip survivorship of 66% at 13.4 years (SE 0.403, 95% CI, 10.886–12.466) based on the need for further re-revision surgery for any major reason. The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis of time to re-revision surgery due acetabular component loosening showed a cumulative proportion of survivorship of 98.9% at 13.4 years (SE 0.136; 95% CI, 12.998–13.529). There were a total of 41/100 complications and the most common complication was dislocation (24/100). Re-revision for any major reason was performed on 18/100 of the revision arthroplasties. The mean time to re-revision was 4.9 years (SD 5.247; range 0.1–13.2 years). Discussion: The trabecular TM acetabular component gives excellent outcomes regarding stability and fixation to the acetabulum in acetabulum revision hip arthroplasty at a minimum of ten years of follow-up. However, acetabular component malposition and the small head size (28 mm) are risk factors for dislocation.

scholarly journals Acetabular Component Anteversion in Primary and Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: An Observational Study

2013 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 600-604
Author(s):  
Olav Reikerås ◽  
Ragnhild B. Gunderson
Keyword(s):  
Acetabular Component ◽  
Target Range ◽  
Ceramic Head ◽  
Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Acetabular Anteversion ◽  
Target Zone ◽  
Revision Tha ◽  
Free Hand Technique ◽  
Revision Operations ◽  
Acetabular Components

Purpose: In a prospective manner to evaluate the range of acetabular component anteversion actually achieved by the use of a cup positioner in cementless revision and primary THA. Methods: We operated 71 patients with cementless primary THA, and 26 patients with cementless acetabular revision surgery. We aimed to obtain cup anteversion of 10 to 30° with an impactor-positioner. In all cases we used elevated liners and a ceramic head with diameter 28. At 3 months postoperatively the component versions were measured using CT with the patient in supine position. Results: The acetabular component version in the primary hips ranged from 28° of retroversion to 42° of anteversion with a mean of 17.4 ± 14.0°, while the cup version in the revision hips ranged from 4° of retroversion to 32° of anteversion with a mean of 15.0 ± 9.6°(p=0.427). The anteversion of 40 (56%) of the primary acetabular components were within the target zone of 10 to 30°, while 19 (27%) were below the target zone and and 12 (17%) were above the target range. The anteversion of 19 (73%) of the revision acetabular components were within the target zone, while 6 (23%) were below the target zone and 1 (4%) were above the target range. The differences in distribution between the primary and revision operations were not significant (p=0.183). Conclusions: The intraoperative estimation of acetabular anteversion by free hand technique in many cases was not within the intended range of 10 to 30° in either primary or revision THA and with no differences between the two series

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document