scholarly journals Analisi di Budget Impact di Ticagrelor nel Trattamento di Prevenzione in Pazienti con Sindrome Coronarica Acuta

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. grhta.5000255
Author(s):  
Gian Piero Perna ◽  
Roberto Ravasio ◽  
Antonio Ricciardelli
Keyword(s):  
Budget Impact ◽  
Sindrome Coronarica Acuta

Budget Impact Analyse zur Einführung eines Hepatitis B- und C-Screenings in den Check-Up 35 der gesetzlichen Krankenkassen

2015 ◽  
Vol 77 (08/09) ◽  
Author(s):  
C Barth ◽  
S Neusser ◽  
J Biermann ◽  
J Wiegand ◽  
I Wolffram ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatitis B ◽  
Budget Impact

scholarly journals Budget Impact Analysis of Anticoagulation Clinics in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation under Chronic Therapy with Oral Anticoagulants

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 215013272110002
Author(s):  
William Uribe-Arango ◽  
Juan Manuel Reyes Sánchez ◽  
Natalia Castaño Gamboa
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Impact Analysis ◽  
Budget Impact ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Anticoagulation Therapy ◽  
Group Versus ◽  
Cost Of Care ◽  
Chronic Therapy ◽  
Colombian Government ◽  
The Cost

Objectives To assess budget impact of the implementation of an anticoagulation clinic (AC) compared to usual care (UC), in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). Method A decision tree was designed to analyze the cost and events rates over a 1-year horizon. The patients were distributed according to treatment, 30% Direct Oral Anticoagulant (DOAC) regimens and the rest to warfarin. The thromboembolism and bleeding were derived from observational studies which demonstrated that ACs had important impact in reducing the frequency of these events compared with UC, due to higher adherence with DOACs and proportion of time in therapeutic range (TTR) with warfarin. Costs were derived from the transactional platform of Colombian government, healthcare authority reimbursement and published studies. The values were expressed in American dollars (USD). The exchanged rate used was COP $3.693 per dollar. Results During 1 year of follow-up, in a cohort of 228 patients there were estimated 48 bleedings, 6 thromboembolisms in AC group versus 84 bleedings, and 12 thromboembolisms events in patients receiving UC. Total costs related to AC were $126 522 compared with $141 514 in UC. The AC had an important reduction in the cost of clinical events versus UC ($52 085 vs $110 749) despite a higher cost of care facilities ($74 436 vs $30 765). A sensibility analysis suggested that in the 83% of estimations, the AC produced savings varied between $27 078 and $135 391. Conclusions This study demonstrated that AC compared with UC, produced an important savings in the oral anticoagulation therapy for patients with NVAF.

scholarly journals PIN150 Economic VALUE of Treatment and Vaccine Technologies to Address the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cost-Effectiveness and Budget IMPACT Analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 23 ◽  
pp. S568
Author(s):  
W. Padula ◽  
S. Malaviya ◽  
N. Reid ◽  
F. Chingcuanco ◽  
J. Ballreich ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Impact Analysis ◽  
Budget Impact ◽  
Economic Value ◽  
Budget Impact Analysis

scholarly journals AB0634 BUDGET IMPACT ANALYSIS OF BIOLOGICAL THERAPY COMPARED TO CONVENTIONAL SPONDYLOARTHRITIS TREATMENT, IN A FOURTH LEVEL HOSPITAL IN BOGOTA COLOMBIA

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1612.2-1613
Author(s):  
J. M. Bello-Gualtero ◽  
O. J. Calixto ◽  
G. Salguedo ◽  
Y. M. Chamorro-Melo ◽  
C. A. Camargo Rodríguez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ankylosing Spondylitis ◽  
Annual Cost ◽  
Impact Analysis ◽  
Budget Impact ◽  
Biological Therapy ◽  
Biologic Therapy ◽  
Disease Diagnosis ◽  
Budget Impact Analysis ◽  
Military Hospital ◽  
Number Of Patients

Background:Spondyloarthritis refers to a family of diseases, of which ankylosing spondylitis and non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis are responsible for axial impairment. Previously, the only treatment available were NSAIDs, which control activity and stop radiological progression, but at the expense of increased adverse effects, such as cardiovascular risk, dyspepsia and chronic renal failure. For the past 2 decades, biological therapy has been available, which means an increase in care costs.Objectives:The objective of this study is to perform a budget impact analysis of biologic therapy.Methods:To do a budget impact analysis from the perspective of the payer, comparing biological therapy with coventional therapy for the treatment of spondyloarthritis. Demographic characterization of the population attended at the Central Military Hospital. Time horizon from 2012 to 2018, taking the activity count according to the hospital’s billing and the prices of the activities of the state body SISMED. Exchange rates at the end of 2018.Results:The patients attended were 117, mostly men (63, 25%), average age 46, 4 years (SD 13), with disease diagnosis time of 9, 8 years (SD 9, 6). In the budget impact analysis, it is observed that 25% of patients were on DMARDs therapy, 22% with NSAIDs and 96% with biologic therapy. The average year/patient cost with NSAIDs alone would be EUR 381, with DMARDs only EUR 9,318 and, if only biological therapy was used, EUR 423. Within the total number of patients, the average annual cost, including the possibility of combining these drugs, amounted to EUR 5,403Conclusion:Including biological therapy in the care of patients with spondyloarthritis can increase up to 24 times the annual cost per patient. This increase is not only due to higher market value, it also relates to the need for more medical procedures and diagnostic follow-up tests.References:[1]Strömbeck, et al. Cost of Illness from the Public Payers’ Perspective in Patients with Ankylosing Spondylitis in Rheumatological Care. J Rheumatol 2010;37;2348-2355.Disclosure of Interests:None declared

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document