Dexamethasone Intravitreal Implant at the Time of Cataract Surgery in Eyes with Diabetic Macular Edema

2016 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 433-437 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giacomo A. Panozzo ◽  
Elena Gusson ◽  
Giorgio Panozzo ◽  
Giulia Dalla Mura
Keyword(s):  
Macular Edema ◽  
Diabetic Macular Edema ◽  
Foveal Thickness ◽  
Dexamethasone Intravitreal Implant ◽  
Positive Effects ◽  
Intravitreal Implant ◽  
A Prospective Study

Purpose To determine the potential role of intraoperative dexamethasone intravitreal implant (DEX-I) in reducing diabetic macular edema (DME) worsening after phacoemulsification. Methods This was a prospective study on 19 eyes of 19 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus with DME and cataract. Mean preoperative Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study visual acuity (VA) was 16.7 letters. Mean foveal thickness (FT) was 451 μm. The DME was naive in 11 eyes and refractory in 8 eyes. All eyes underwent a standard phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation; DEX-I was injected at the end of surgery. Follow-up was performed at 1 week and then monthly until DME recurrence (up to 8 months). Results At 1 week, mean VA improved by 15 letters (range 0-29 letters) and mean FT decreased by 147 μm (range 69-236 μm). Improvement consolidated at month 1, with a mean VA improvement of 18 letters (range 3-32 letters) and a mean improvement in FT of 193 μm (range 76-304 μm), remaining stable at month 2 after surgery in all eyes. The DME recurred in 1 eye at month 3, in 14 eyes (73.8%) between months 4 and 5, and after month 6 in 4 eyes (21%). Refractory DMEs demonstrated the same benefit but recurred earlier than naive ones (4 months versus 5.8 months, p<0.01). Conclusions Intraoperative DEX-I prevents DME worsening after phacoemulsification. Its positive effects last for at least 3 months.

Rapid response to dexamethasone intravitreal implant in diabetic macular edema

2017 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 74-79 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giuseppe Lo Giudice ◽  
Antonio Avarello ◽  
Gianluca Campana ◽  
Alessandro Galan
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Macular Edema ◽  
Diabetic Macular Edema ◽  
Secondary Outcome ◽  
Dexamethasone Intravitreal Implant ◽  
Clinical Series ◽  
Intravitreal Implant ◽  
Early Effects ◽  
Sd Oct

Purpose: To evaluate the early effects of dexamethasone (DEX) intravitreal implants in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME). Methods: This was a prospective, single-arm, interventional clinical series. Eighteen patients (18 eyes) with chronic/recalcitrant or naive DME were included. Patients underwent single DEX intravitreal implant. Clinical assessments, including ophthalmologic examination, central retinal thickness (CRT) measurement by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) scan, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and intraocular pressure (IOP) were carried out at baseline, 1-3 hours, and then 3, 7, and 30 days after treatment. The main outcome was change in CRT on SD-OCT, while secondary outcome measures included visual acuity (VA) and changes in IOP following implant. Results: Mean CRT significantly decreased from 565 ± 171 µm at baseline to 310 ± 89 µm at end of follow-up (p<0.001), with reduction becoming evident 1-3 hours after injection. Mean BCVA also significantly improved 7 days and 30 days after treatment up to 0.14 logMAR (p<0.05). All patients had a controlled IOP after the injection with only 1/18 eyes having a transient increase in IOP during follow-up. Conclusions: This is the first study showing very early effects of DEX implants on CRT reduction and VA improvement in DME.

scholarly journals Dexamethasone intravitreal implant (Ozurdex) in diabetic macular edema: real-world data versus clinical trials outcomes

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (10) ◽  
pp. 1571-1580
Author(s):  
Pedro Neves ◽  
◽  
Inês Matias ◽  
João Rodrigues ◽  
Margarida Santos ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Macular Edema ◽  
Diabetic Macular Edema ◽  
Demographic Data ◽  
Antiangiogenic Therapy ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Real World Data ◽  
Dexamethasone Intravitreal Implant ◽  
Intravitreal Implant ◽  
Treatment Naïve

AIM: To investigate the safety and efficacy of intravitreal dexamethasone implants (Ozurdex®/DEX) in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) either naïve or non-naïve to anti-VEGF therapies who switched to DEX implant independent of response to anti-vascular endothelial growth factors (anti-VEGFs). METHODS: This was an audit retrospective review of medical records of patients with DME who switched to the DEX intravitreal implant. Patients were divided into 2 groups: patients naïve to antiangiogenic therapy and patients who were previously treated with anti-VEGFs. Data regarding demographics, changes in mean best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central macular thickness (CMT), and intraocular pressure (IOP) was collected over 6mo. The demographic data mean changes in BCVA, CMT, and IOP were compared. Six-month follow-up data of 47 patients (57 eyes), who either switched to DEX implant irrespective of response to previous treatments or were treatment naïve before receiving DEX implant, was collected. RESULTS: Improvement in mean BCVA was observed from 1-4mo after injection with a decreased effect at month 6 as expected, with better outcomes in naïve compared to non-naïve patients. A statistically relevant decrease in mean CMT was observed during the follow-up period. An increase in mean IOP was observed in the first 2mo after DEX therapy. The mean number of injections of the overall population during the 6mo was 1.3. A subgroup analysis showed no relevant difference between phakic versus pseudophakic patients relative to measured outcomes. There was no cataract progression during the follow-up period and no adverse events reported. CONCLUSION: This real-life setting study shows that intravitreal DEX implant is effective and safe. The timings of greater therapeutic impact are concordant with previous studies and suggest that earlier treatment with corticosteroids may have an additional benefit in naïve patients.

Switching to intravitreal fluocinolone acetonide implant for refractory diabetic macular edema: 12- and 24-month results

2021 ◽  
pp. 112067212199298
Author(s):  
Argyrios Chronopoulos ◽  
Panagiotis Chronopoulos ◽  
Agharza Ashurov ◽  
Christina Korb ◽  
Norbert Pfeiffer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Macular Edema ◽  
Diabetic Macular Edema ◽  
Fluocinolone Acetonide ◽  
Additional Treatment ◽  
Multicentric Study ◽  
Goldmann Tonometry ◽  
Refractory Diabetic Macular Edema ◽  
Intravitreal Implant ◽  
Fluocinolone Acetonide Implant

Purpose: To report visual and anatomical outcomes of chronic/refractory diabetic macular edema (DME) treated with intravitreal fluocinolone acetonide implant. Setting: Retrospective, one arm, multicentric study. Method: Between 2013 and 2018, 27 consecutive eyes of 25 patients with chronic/refractory DME were treated with a fluocinolone acetonide intravitreal implant. Best registered visual acuity (BRVA), central retinal thickness (CRT), and Goldmann tonometry intraocular pressure (IOP) were assessed at 12 and 24 months. The need for IOP lowering treatment as well as top-up therapy during the follow-up were also assessed. Results: The duration of DME prior to treatment in our study was 54 ± 24 months. The baseline mean BRVA of 0.7 ± 0.34 logMAR improved to 0.5 ± 0.3 ( p = 0.01) at 12 months and 0.46 ± 0.3 ( p = 0.04) at 24 months. At 12 months, BRVA improved in 14 eyes (52%), stabilized in 5 eyes (20%), and decreased in 3 eyes (11%). At 24 months, BRVA improved further in 6 eyes (24%), stabilized in 3 eyes (12%), and decreased in 6 eyes (24 %). Mean CRT decreased from 497 ± 176 to 349 ± 186 μm at 12 months ( p = 0.0005) and to 267 ± 104 μm at 24 months ( p = 0.001). Only five eyes required additional treatment for DME and only three eyes required treatment for raised IOP. Discussion: Our results show that the visual and the anatomical improvements achieved by a single injection of a fluocinolone acetonide implant were maintained up to 24 months with minimal additional therapy even in eyes with a long and heavy history; however, IOP monitoring remains essential.

Dexamethasone Intravitreal Implant in Combination with Laser Photocoagulation for the Treatment of Diffuse Diabetic Macular Edema

Ophthalmology ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 120 (9) ◽  
pp. 1843-1851 ◽  
Author(s):  
David G. Callanan ◽  
Sunil Gupta ◽  
David S. Boyer ◽  
Thomas A. Ciulla ◽  
Michael A. Singer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Macular Edema ◽  
Diabetic Macular Edema ◽  
Laser Photocoagulation ◽  
Dexamethasone Intravitreal Implant ◽  
Intravitreal Implant ◽  
Diffuse Diabetic Macular Edema

Long-Term Efficacy of Dexamethasone Intravitreal Implant in the Treatment of Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada (VKH) Disease Relapsing Posterior Uveitis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tarek Roshdy Elhamaky
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Posterior Uveitis ◽  
Systemic Steroid ◽  
Foveal Thickness ◽  
Dexamethasone Intravitreal Implant ◽  
Central Foveal Thickness ◽  
Intravitreal Implant ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Vkh Disease

Abstract Purpose: To investigate the efficacy and safety of dexamethasone intravitreal implant in the treatment of relapsing posterior uveitis in patients with chronic recurrent VKH disease.Methods: This is a prospective study of 29 eyes of 16 patients with posterior uveitis in chronic recurrent VKH disease. All patients received previous systemic steroid and immunosuppressive regimens. All patients underwent a comprehensive ophthalmic examination, including BCVA (log MAR), IOP, FFA, and SD-OCT. All patients underwent intravitreal injection with sustained-release dexamethasone 0.7 mg implant (Ozurdex®). Primary outcome measures included mean change in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central foveal thickness (CFT) at 24 months follow-up compared to baseline. Results: At 24 months follow-up, the mean BCVA improved from 0.82 ± 0.13 to 0.38 ± 0.06logMAR (P <0.0001). The mean CFT reduced from 505 ± 29 to 244 ± 23 um (P <0.0001). The mean IOP changed from 15.1±2.2 to16.9±3.1 mmHg with no significant value. Twenty-one eyes (72.4%) received one injection, while eight eyes (27.6%) required two injections. The mean number of injections was 1.2± 0.60. The mean follow-up time was 24.75± 0.9months. No serious ocular or systemic adverse events were noted during the follow-up period. Ocular hypertension was recorded in there (10.3%) eyes and controlled by IOP lowering medications. Cataract progression occurred in 11 (37.9%) eyes.Conclusions: Our cohort highlights the beneficial effects of the Dexamethasone implant 0.7 mg in the treatment of VKH disease relapsing posterior uveitis improving visual acuity, reducing macular edema, and minimizing the burden of systemic steroid in this sample study.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document