scholarly journals ‘Take AIM’ – Raising awareness of Acute Internal Medicine

2015 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 137-137
Author(s):  
Adrian Kennedy ◽  
◽  
Charlotte Masterton-Smith ◽  
Joe Wheeler ◽  
Lynsey Threlfall ◽  
...  

Acute Internal Medicine (AIM) may be the ‘new kid on the block’ as a medical specialty but it lies at the heart of our health service. Recognition of the importance of early senior review in managing medical patients admitted to hospital in an emergency has led to a dramatic expansion in the number of consultant posts being created in acute medical units across the UK. This has been matched by a similar rise in the number of higher speciality training positions, with over 100 posts being advertised every year. Although the majority of these posts have been filled, this expansion, combined with a relative lack of awareness of the speciality, has meant that vacancies remain in many Deaneries. This needs to be addressed in order for the speciality to continue to expand, and deliver high quality, consultant-led acute medical care in every hospital in the UK.

1995 ◽  
Vol 166 (3) ◽  
pp. 306-310 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tony Jaffa

BackgroundThe way in which psychiatric services for adolescents in the UK are developing will be affected by recent changes in the organisation of the National Health Service.MethodThe history of these services, and the different opportunities for development are reviewed.ResultsWays in which high-quality clinical care can still be provided are indicated.ConclusionAdolescent psychiatric services should be judged on their ability to provide such care, not merely on their ability to survive.


2014 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 181-186 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alex Collister ◽  
Manroop Bains ◽  
Rachel Jackson ◽  
Emily Clarke ◽  
Raj Patel

2003 ◽  
Vol 27 (09) ◽  
pp. 346-348
Author(s):  
Chris Simpson ◽  
Prasanna De Silva

The increase in older people in the UK will increase the need for mental health services to run efficient, high-quality services. Multi-disciplinary team assessments, although not new, provide a method of increasing the capacity to see referrals. Two similar systems of multi-disciplinary team assessments from North Yorkshire are reported with evidence of improvement in quality.


2020 ◽  
Vol 237 (12) ◽  
pp. 1400-1408
Author(s):  
Heinrich Heimann ◽  
Deborah Broadbent ◽  
Robert Cheeseman

AbstractThe customary doctor and patient interactions are currently undergoing significant changes through technological advances in imaging and data processing and the need for reducing person-to person contacts during the COVID-19 crisis. There is a trend away from face-to-face examinations to virtual assessments and decision making. Ophthalmology is particularly amenable to such changes, as a high proportion of clinical decisions are based on routine tests and imaging results, which can be assessed remotely. The uptake of digital ophthalmology varies significantly between countries. Due to financial constraints within the National Health Service, specialized ophthalmology units in the UK have been early adopters of digital technology. For more than a decade, patients have been managed remotely in the diabetic retinopathy screening service and virtual glaucoma clinics. We describe the day-to-day running of such services and the doctor and patient experiences with digital ophthalmology in daily practice.


2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. ii137-ii137
Author(s):  
Gordon Chavez ◽  
Christina Proescholdt

Abstract BACKGROUND Despite the importance of Health State Utilities for health policy and medical decision making, there are no publications that provide high quality utility values estimated from glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) patients. Published health economic evaluations for GBM treatments rely on utilities determined by Garside et al. (2007), which used the standard gamble method in healthy panel members of the UK National Health System. There are no published utilities for GBM estimated from a general population sample, and there are no utility estimates whatsoever for Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) users. METHODS We designed a study to remedy this major deficit by eliciting utilities directly from GBM patients using the EuroQol 5-Dimension (EQ-5D) survey. The EQ-5D is a widely used and NICE-recommended tool for the estimation of health state utilities. The survey is composed of a questionnaire that asks patients to specify their health state along 5 dimensions: Mobility, Self-Care, Usual Activities, Pain/Discomfort, and Anxiety/Depression. Statistical models provided by EuroQol’s network of researchers convert this data into health state utility estimates. RESULTS The EQ-5D questionnaire is administered to active patients using TTFields treatment during the study duration, allowing the elicitation of health preference measures for different glioblastoma health states based on: progression status (progressed vs. non-progressed), current treatments (TTFields only vs. TTFields + others) and time-from-diagnosis (0-12 months vs. > 12 months) CONCLUSION These results are important for understanding the patient preferences using TTFields treatment and communicating these preferences to decision makers. This study is the first to provide direct, high quality utility measures in glioblastoma patients using TTFields treatment.


2015 ◽  
Vol 45 (1) ◽  
pp. 83-99 ◽  
Author(s):  
MARK EXWORTHY ◽  
PAULA HYDE ◽  
PAMELA MCDONALD-KUHNE

AbstractWe elaborate Le Grand's thesis of ‘knights and knaves’ in terms of clinical excellence awards (CEAs), the ‘financial bonuses’ which are paid to over half of all English hospital specialists and which can be as much as £75,000 (€92,000) per year in addition to an NHS (National Health Service) salary. Knights are ‘individuals who are motivated to help others for no private reward’ while knaves are ‘self-interested individuals who are motivated to help others only if by doing so they will serve their private interests.’ Doctors (individually and collectively) exhibit both traits but the work of explanation of the inter-relationship between them has remained neglected. Through a textual analysis of written responses to a recent review of CEAs, we examine the ‘knightly’ and ‘knavish’ arguments used by medical professional stakeholders in defending these CEAs. While doctors promote their knightly claims, they are also knavish in shaping the preferences of, and options for, policy-makers. Policy-makers continue to support CEAs but have introduced revised criteria for CEAs, putting pressure on the medical profession to accept reforms. CEAs illustrate the enduring and flexible power of the medical profession in the UK in colonising reforms to their pay, and also the subtle inter-relationship between knights and knaves in health policy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document