scholarly journals Uma Análise Neoriemanniana da Primeira Cena do Artémis de Nepomuceno

2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rita de Cássia Taddei
Keyword(s):  

Da extensa obra teórica de Hugo Riemann, sua teoria das funções harmônicas permanece sendo a contribuição mais difundida. Menos conhecidos, os escritos da última fase sugerem novos modelos de compreensão do campo harmônico tonal que abandonam os paradigmas funcionalistas. Desde as últimas décadas do século XX, esse testamento de Riemann tem sido reavaliado por uma nova geração de teóricos, denominados neo-riemannianos, dentre os quais se destacam Lewin, Hyer, Richard Cohn e David Kopp, que propuseram suas próprias teorias a partir do modelo de Riemann. O foco deste trabalho é fazer uma breve consolidação da teoria da harmonia transformacional neo-riemanniana, adotando finalmente o modelo proposto por David Kopp (2002) para apresentar uma análise transformacional da Cena I da ópera Artémis de Alberto Nepomuceno.

Author(s):  
Danuta Mirka

This chapter deals with hypermetrical irregularities in phrases expanded by means of parenthesis, repetition, and appendix. All these means of phrase expansion were recognized by eighteenth-century authors. The discussion of parenthesis reveals an uncharacteristically careless treatment of this concept by Heinrich Christoph Koch. It outlines its further development by Hugo Riemann and Heinrich Schenker and deconstructs the concept of parenthesis developed by William Rothstein (1989), thus restoring it to eighteenth-century perspective. The discussion of repetition engages with Rothstein’s discussion of this technique of phrase expansion and its effect upon hypermeter. The discussion of appendix compares Koch’s account of this concept to Rothstein’s concept of “suffix.”


Notes ◽  
1982 ◽  
Vol 38 (4) ◽  
pp. 843
Author(s):  
Channan Willner ◽  
Hellmut Federhofer

1953 ◽  
Vol 48 ◽  
pp. 182-190
Author(s):  
H. J. W. Tillyard

Two recent publications mark an important stage in the progress of Byzantine musical studies—the facsimile of the Hirmologium at Grottaferrata (Codex G) and the transcription of two Modes from the Athos manuscript (Codex H) of which the facsimile appeared in 1938. These two manuscripts, though their dates are more than a hundred years apart, embody the standard musical tradition of the Hirmologium, whose origin lies in a far remoter antiquity. Otherwise they differ greatly; for, while H is often obscure and inaccurate, we are delighted by the clarity and beauty of G, a manuscript long familiar to scholars and already used (or rather, alas, misused) by Dr. Hugo Riemann before 1909. It is therefore the good fortune of our time that we may now use G to correct or elucidate the text of H.When we consider the signatures of the Byzantine Modes, it becomes clear that there are two main points for discussion—firstly, the actual meaning of the signature as an indication of the initial note or initial formula of the hymn; and, secondly, the origin and growth of the signature itself and the significance of its component parts.As it happens, the former of these points has attracted earlier attention; and a practical explanation was reached before 1931. This resulted in a table of signatures, which has been amplified and thoroughly tested, so that it is now supported by the decipherment of at least two thousand hymns, carried out partly by Prof. Egon Wellesz and his collaborators, and partly by myself. Such an inductive procedure was made necessary by the conventional nature of the signatures, few of which bore a self-evident clue to their meaning. But, now that the table of signatures is firmly established, we can read all the eight Modes with equal assurance and can usually evaluate an abnormal signature by the same method.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document