scholarly journals DNA and life cycle in Drosophila melanogaster: a nutritional-molecular connection

Author(s):  
Ruchira Das ◽  
◽  
Avik Paul ◽  
Asmita Samadder ◽  
◽  
...  

Nutrition plays a key role in different organisms to carry out life processes at different phases of life cycle. Furthermore, specific types of food are needed to build DNA. They are further required to synthesize genes/hormones etc. Thus to evaluate the nutritional-DNA correlation in Drosophila sp. for differential life cycle events and fecundity, different nutrients medium were chosen and the phases of life cycle of Drosophila sp were assessed along with quantification of isolated DNA collected from flies of each set. All the data were compared against control set C containing banana. Other experimental set consisted of nutrient mediums like glucon-D (A1), rice (A2), sugar (A3), butter/ghee (A4), paneer (A5) and mango (A6) mixed with banana. All the life cycle stages/phases i.e., egg to larva (P1), larva to pupa (P2) and pupa to adult fly (P3) were studied. Results revealed addition of rice (A2) reduces the moulting time significantly at P1 to P2 stage when compared to control-C; whereas mango (A6) reduced the time taken to reach P2 to P3 stage. However, the DNA content of flies collected from A2, A3 and A6 set were higher than those collected from other sets. Therefore, the overall result clearly supports the fact that preference of carbohydrate was greater than other nutrients, however, an optimum level of total carbohydrate content was preferred for better survival and growth which possibly enhances the genomic DNA synthesis and aid in accelerating the production of several genes/ hormones involved in moulting of Drosophila sp.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Saniya Deshmukh ◽  
Varada Abhyankar ◽  
Shamsudheen Karuthedath Vellarikkal ◽  
Sridhar Sivasubbu ◽  
Vinod Scaria ◽  
...  

ABSTRACTDrosophila melanogaster undergoes holometabolous development, has very low levels of DNA methylation, and is known to possess a single known methyltransferase, dDNMT2. This study compares the DNA methylation patterns between the two life cycle stages of D. melanogaster using a combination of DNA immunoprecipitation and high throughput sequencing techniques.Our results indicate, a change in the chromosomal distribution of the sparse DNA methylation concerning genes and natural transposable elements between in the embryo and the adult stages of D. melanogaster. The differentially methylated regions localised on genes involved in the regulation of cell cycle processes of mitotic cell divisions and chromosomal segregation. dDNMT2 knockout flies exhibited altered patterns of DNA methylation. The observed differences in DNA methylation were in genes involved in cellular communication and cytoskeletal functions. The variation in DNA methylation between the two life cycle stages is indicative that it could have a role in regulatory processes during development and, dDNMT2 may have a role as a co-factor for the hitherto undiscovered DNA methyltransferase in D. melanogaster.


Ever since meiosis was recognized as a process there has been a continuing interest in its temporal aspects. Two main types of meiotic timing experiments have been conducted: first, experiments to estimate the duration of meiosis (and sometimes its stages) ; second, experiments to locate the sensitive stage(s) when exposure of meiocytes to various treatments can affect meiotic chromosome behaviour (e.g. pairing or recombination). Such experiments have played an important role in increasing our understanding of the meiotic process.The duration of meiosis has been estimated in about 70 organisms, including two prokaryotes (yeast and Chlamydomonas ) and the following eukaryotes : 1 Basidiomycete ( Coprinus lagopus ), 2 Gymnosperms ( Larix decidua and Thuja plicata gracilis ), at least 39 angiosperms, and at least 26 animal species. The duration of female meiosis has been estimated in far fewer species than male meiosis. However, estimates of the duration of female meiosis are available for 6 angiosperms, Drosophila melanogaster , Xenopus laevis , and several mammals. Comparison of these data shows that the duration of meiosis is one of the most variable aspects of the meiotic process, ranging from less than 6 h in yeast to more than 40 years in the human female. Developmental holds at different stages of meiosis are common in plants and animals, and inevitably prolong the meiotic division. However, even among species without developmental holds, the duration of meiosis is very variable. For instance, in animals it ranges from about 1-2 days in male Drosophila melanogaster to more than 24 days in male Homo sapiens and several Orthopterans. Despite the large variation in the duration of meiosis three generalizations can be made: (i) first prophase is always very long compared with the remaining meiotic stages, (ii) the rate of meiotic development is very slow compared with the rate of development in dividing somatic meristem cells of the same organisms under the same conditions, (iii) the duration of meiosis is characteristic of the genotype and species. Four main factors have been recognized which effect or determine the duration of meiosis, namely (1) environmental factors (e.g. temperature); (2) nuclear DNA content ; (3) ploidy level of the organism; and, (4) the genotype. Because nuclear DNA content plays a major role in determining the duration of meiosis, it has been suggested that DNA influences the rate of meiotic development in two ways: first through its informational content (the genotype), and second indirectly by the physical and mechanical effects of its mass independently of its informational content (i.e. the nucleotype). Thus, the observed duration of meiosis is the result of a complex genotype-nucleotype-environment interaction. With the obvious exception of variation caused by developmental holds, changes in the duration of meiosis usually involve proportional changes in the durations of all its stages. This is true irrespective of whether the variation in meiotic time is associated with changes in temperature, nuclear DNA amount, ploidy level, or sex difference. While results for animal species show some evidence of a similar phenomenon, the relative proportions of meiosis taken by individual meiotic stages is clearly much more variable between animal species than between plants. The duration of meiosis often has much wider implications for the organism than those affecting the meiotic process per se . Examples are given from which it is concluded, first, that the duration of meiosis can limit the type of life cycle which a species can display; and second, that in many species the duration of the meiosis is an essential adaptive feature suited to its life cycle type in its normal environment.


2019 ◽  
Vol 0 (3) ◽  
pp. 53-60 ◽  
Author(s):  
T.Yu. Altufyeva ◽  
◽  
P.A. Ivanov ◽  
G.R. Sakhapova ◽  
◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 66 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Susana Gómez-González ◽  
Lohengrin A Cavieres ◽  
Patricio Torres ◽  
Cristian Torres-Díaz

Genetics ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 147 (3) ◽  
pp. 1213-1224
Author(s):  
Jean-Philippe Charles ◽  
Carol Chihara ◽  
Shamim Nejad ◽  
Lynn M Riddiford

A 36-kb genomic DNA segment of the Drosophila melanogaster genome containing 12 clustered cuticle genes has been mapped and partially sequenced. The cluster maps at 65A 5-6 on the left arm of the third chromosome, in agreement with the previously determined location of a putative cluster encompassing the genes for the third instar larval cuticle proteins LCP5, LCP6 and LCP8. This cluster is the largest cuticle gene cluster discovered to date and shows a number of surprising features that explain in part the genetic complexity of the LCP5, LCP6 and LCP8 loci. The genes encoding LCP5 and LCP8 are multiple copy genes and the presence of extensive similarity in their coding regions gives the first evidence for gene conversion in cuticle genes. In addition, five genes in the cluster are intronless. Four of these five have arisen by retroposition. The other genes in the cluster have a single intron located at an unusual location for insect cuticle genes.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document