Volunteer potato density interference in sugar beet.

2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donald L. Shouse ◽  
Don W. Morishita ◽  
J. Daniel Henningsen ◽  
Robyn C. Walton ◽  
Michael P. Quinn
Keyword(s):  
Sugar Beet ◽  
Volunteer Potato

Volunteer potato timing of removal with and without glyphosate in sugar beet.

2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Don W. Morishita ◽  
Joel Felix ◽  
Donald L. Shouse ◽  
J. Daniel Henningsen
Keyword(s):  
Sugar Beet ◽  
Volunteer Potato

Volunteer potato interference and removal timing in sugar beet

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
Albert T. Adjesiwor ◽  
Joel Felix ◽  
Don W. Morishita
Keyword(s):  
Sugar Beet ◽  
Potato Tuber ◽  
Tuber Initiation ◽  
Competition Experiment ◽  
Root Yield ◽  
Beet Root ◽  
Volunteer Potato ◽  
Untreated Check ◽  
Initiation Stage ◽  
Sugar Beet Root

Abstract Field studies were conducted from 2005 to 2009 in Idaho and Oregon to 1) evaluate the competitive effect of volunteer potato on sugar beet yield (volunteer potato competition experiment), and 2) determine the optimum timing of volunteer potato removal from glyphosate-tolerant sugar beet fields using glyphosate (volunteer potato removal timing experiment). The volunteer potato competition experiment consisted of eight potato densities, including the untreated check: 0, 6,741, 10,092, 13,455, 16,818, 20,184, 26,910, and 40,365 tubers ha−1. The volunteer potato removal experiment consisted of 10 removal timings (including the untreated check) ranging from the 10-cm rosette stage to mid-tuber bulking. There was a linear decrease in sugar beet root and sucrose yield as volunteer potato density increased (P < 0.001) such that with every volunteer potato tuber per square meter, sugar beet root yield decreased by 15% and sucrose yield decreased by 14%. At the highest volunteer potato density (40,365 tubers ha−1), sugar beet root yield was 29,600 kg ha−1 (compared to 73,600 kg ha−1 for the untreated), representing a 60% reduction in sugar beet root yield. In the removal timing study, a one-time application of glyphosate at the 10-cm rosette, hooking, and tuber initiation stages provided 74% to 98% reduction in volunteer potato tuber biomass. Delaying volunteer potato removal beyond the tuber initiation stage reduced sugar beet root and sucrose yield (12% to 20%), resulting in an economic loss of $104 to $161 per hectare. The best potato removal timing that optimizes the trade-off between improved control and potential for sugar beet yield reductions is before or at the tuber initiation stage.

Transfer learning for the classification of sugar beet and volunteer potato under field conditions

2018 ◽  
Vol 174 ◽  
pp. 50-65 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hyun K. Suh ◽  
Joris IJsselmuiden ◽  
Jan Willem Hofstee ◽  
Eldert J. van Henten
Keyword(s):  
Sugar Beet ◽  
Transfer Learning ◽  
Field Conditions ◽  
Volunteer Potato

scholarly journals Adaptive detection of volunteer potato plants in sugar beet fields

2009 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. 433-447 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. T. Nieuwenhuizen ◽  
J. W. Hofstee ◽  
E. J. van Henten
Keyword(s):  
Sugar Beet ◽  
Adaptive Detection ◽  
Potato Plants ◽  
Volunteer Potato

Extraction and composition of pectins and hemicelluloses of cell walls of sugar beet roots grown in Morocco

2001 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
pp. 35-46 ◽  
Author(s):  
Khalid Fares ◽  
C. M. G. C. Renard ◽  
Qamar R'Zina ◽  
Jean-Francois Thibault
Keyword(s):  
Sugar Beet ◽  
Cell Walls

Analyses of the stomach deposit that develops inMyzus persicaefeeding on sugar beet

1998 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 347-353
Author(s):  
N. B. Kift ◽  
F. A. Mellon ◽  
A. M. Dewar ◽  
A. F. G. Dixon
Keyword(s):  
Sugar Beet
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document