scholarly journals The EASY (Early Access to Support for You) sickness absence service: a four-year evaluation of the impact on absenteeism

2015 ◽  
Vol 41 (2) ◽  
pp. 204-215 ◽  
Author(s):  
Judith Brown ◽  
Daniel Mackay ◽  
Evangelia Demou ◽  
Joyce Craig ◽  
John Frank ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
pp. 019791832110002
Author(s):  
Matteo Vergani ◽  
Ihsan Yilmaz ◽  
Greg Barton ◽  
James Barry ◽  
Galib Bashirov ◽  
...  

This IMR Research Note examines the impact of the level of bonding social capital on access to employment among newly arrived Afghan refugees in Victoria (Australia). Based on a mixed-methods analysis of biographical interviews with 80 Afghan refugees, it examines their use of social capital, year by year, during the first three years after their arrival. Our analysis shows that higher levels of bonding social capital are associated with greater success in finding employment during the first and second year of settlement. In the third year, however, bonding social capital for Afghan refugees in Victoria is no longer a significant predictor of employment. This Research Note helps clarify inconsistent findings in the literature on the effects of social capital on obtaining employment by suggesting that bonding social capital’s impact on refugee employment success changes significantly across the first three years after arrival. This finding has important implications for migration policy and the prioritization of resources toward services for newly arrived refugees.


2012 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 14-21 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hanne Derycke ◽  
Peter Vlerick ◽  
Bart Van de Ven ◽  
Isabel Rots ◽  
Els Clays

2019 ◽  
Vol 46 (3) ◽  
pp. 330-334 ◽  
Author(s):  
Morten Birkeland Nielsen ◽  
Stein Knardahl

2020 ◽  
Vol 112 ◽  
pp. 103611 ◽  
Author(s):  
Idaira Rodriguez Santana ◽  
Misael Anaya Montes ◽  
Martin Chalkley ◽  
Rowena Jacobs ◽  
Tina Kowalski ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 28 (suppl_4) ◽  
Author(s):  
TN Hanvold ◽  
K Corbett ◽  
P Kristensen ◽  
IS Mehlum

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johan Høy Jensen ◽  
Theis Lange ◽  
Esben Meulengracht Flachs ◽  
Janne Skakon ◽  
Naja Hulvej Rod ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Therese Nordberg Hanvold ◽  
Petter Kristensen ◽  
Karina Corbett ◽  
Rachel Louise Hasting ◽  
Ingrid Sivesind Mehlum

Abstract Background The study objective was to evaluate the impact of a population-level intervention (the IA Agreement) on the one-year risk for long-term sickness absence spells (LSAS) among young and middle aged workers in Norway. Methods Using an observational design, we conducted a quasi-experimental study to analyse registry data on individual LSAS for all employed individuals in 2000 (n=298 690) and 2005 (n=352 618), born in Norway between 1976 and 1967. The intervention of interest was the tripartite agreement for a more inclusive working life (the IA Agreement). We estimated difference in pre-post differences (DID) in LSAS between individuals working in IA companies with the intervention and companies without, in 2000 and 2005. We used logistic regression models and present odds ratios (DID OR) with accompanying 95% CI. We stratified analyses by sex, industry and company size. Results . We found no significant change in the overall risk of long-term sickness absence spells after implementing the intervention among young and middle aged workers. Stratified by sex, the intervention resulted in a slight decrease in LSAS risk among female workers (DID OR 0.93 (0.91-0.96)) while the intervention showed no impact among male workers (DID OR 1.01 (0.97-1.06)). We found that companies signing the IA Agreement were large (≥50­ employees) and often within the manufacturing and health and social sectors. In large manufacturing companies, we found a reduction in LSAS, among workers both in companies with and without the intervention, resulting in no statistically significant impact of the IA intervention. In large health and social companies, we found an increase in LSAS among workers both in companies with and without the intervention. The increase was smaller among the workers in companies offering the IA intervention compared with workers in companies without, resulting in a positive impact of the IA intervention in the health and social industry. This impact was statistically significant only among female workers. Conclusions The results indicate that the impact of the IA Agreement on the risk of long-term sickness absence spells varies considerably depending on sex and industry. These findings suggest that reducing LSAS may warrant industry-specific interventions.


2020 ◽  
Vol 36 (4) ◽  
pp. 426-433
Author(s):  
Pilar Pinilla-Dominguez ◽  
Huseyin Naci ◽  
Leeza Osipenko ◽  
Elias Mossialos

ObjectivesTo investigate the impact of the uncertainty stemming from products with European conditional marketing authorization (CMA) or authorization in exceptional circumstances (AEC) on the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence's (NICE) recommendations.MethodsProducts which received CMA/AEC by European Medicines Agency (EMA) up to 1 December 2016 were identified and matched with corresponding NICE decisions issued by August 2017, the status of which was then traced to August 2019. We assessed whether the conversion of CMA to full marketing authorization triggered a review of a NICE decision. The odds of a recommendation carrying a commercial arrangement for products with and without CMA/AEC were calculated.ResultsFifty-four products were granted CMA/AEC by EMA. NICE conducted thirty evaluations of products with CMA/AEC. Twelve products were recommended by NICE by August 2017 and fourteen by August 2019. All recommendations had an associated commercial arrangement. The odds of carrying a commercial arrangement were higher for products with CMA/AEC compared to those with full authorization. Conversions from conditional to full authorization among products not recommended by NICE did not trigger an appraisal review.ConclusionsUncertainty, stemming from the lack of robust clinical data of products authorized with CMA/AEC, has a substantial impact on HTA recommendations, frequently requiring risk mitigation mechanisms such as commercial and data collection arrangements. Further analyses should be conducted to assess whether the benefits of early access strategies outweigh the risks for patients and the healthcare system.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document