scholarly journals Gender differences in the effect of weekly working hours on occupational injury risk in the United States working population

2012 ◽  
Vol 38 (4) ◽  
pp. 349-357 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Wirtz ◽  
David A Lombardi ◽  
Joanna L Willetts ◽  
Simon Folkard ◽  
David C Christiani
Author(s):  
Dawn N. Castillo ◽  
Timothy J. Pizatella ◽  
Nancy A. Stout

This chapter describes occupational injuries and their prevention. It describes in detail the causes of injuries and epidemiology of injuries. Occupational injuries are caused by acute exposure in the workplace to safety hazards, such as mechanical energy, electricity, chemicals, and ionizing radiation, or from the sudden lack of essential agents, such as oxygen or heat. This chapter describes the nature and the magnitude of occupational injuries in the United States. It provides data on risk of injuries in different occupations and industries. Finally, it discusses prevention of injuries, using a hierarchical approach to occupational injury control.


2019 ◽  
Vol 212 (1) ◽  
pp. 146-150 ◽  
Author(s):  
Saba Moghimi ◽  
Kiran Khurshid ◽  
Sabeena Jalal ◽  
Sadia R. Qamar ◽  
Savvas Nicolaou ◽  
...  

Sports ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 145
Author(s):  
Eleanor Taranto ◽  
Michael Fishman ◽  
Holly Benjamin ◽  
Lainie Ross

It remains unknown whether and how sports medicine physicians currently utilize genetic testing in their clinical practice. This study sought to assess knowledge of, experience with, and attitudes towards genetic testing by sports medicine physicians in the United States (US). An email with a survey hyperlink was distributed twice to members of the American Medical Society for Sports Medicine (AMSSM) listserv in September 2016, with approximately a 10% response rate. Questions focused on knowledge of, experience with, and attitudes towards testing for different genes related to sports proficiency, injury risk, and disease risk. Few AMSSM physicians believe that genetic testing to adapt training (12%) or to choose a sport (2%) is ready for clinical adoption. Most respondents self-reported minimal knowledge about, and limited experience with, genetic testing. The main exception was screening for sickle cell trait (SCT) for which most (84%) reported moderate/significant/expert knowledge and over two-thirds had ordered testing. Although most respondents thought it appropriate to counsel and test for health conditions associated with cardiac and connective tissue disorders in the setting of a positive family history, only a minority had been asked to do so. Five or fewer respondents (2%) had been asked to test for performance-associated variants (Angiotensin Converting Enzyme (ACE) II and Alpha-Actinin 3 (ACTN3)), and five or fewer (2%) would recommend changes based on the results. Our study provides a baseline of current US sports medicine physicians’ minimal experiences with, and knowledge of, genetic testing. The findings of our study indicate that sports medicine physicians require further genetics education as it relates to sports and exercise in order to be prepared to competently engage with their patients and to develop sound professional organizational policies.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document