scholarly journals Low blood transfusion rate after implementation of tranexamic acid for fast- track hip- and knee arthroplasty. An observational study of 5205 patients

2021 ◽  
Vol 87 (1) ◽  
pp. 9-16
Author(s):  
Yoeri Bemelmans ◽  
Emil Van Haaren ◽  
Bert Boonen ◽  
Roel Hendrickx ◽  
Martijn Schotanus

The purpose of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the efficacy of a tranexamic acid (TXA) perioperative protocol for primary hip- and knee arthroplasty, in terms of allogenic blood transfusion rates. A retrospective cohort study was conducted and included all primary hip and knee arthroplasty procedures in the period of 2014-2019. Patients who underwent surgery due to trauma or revision were excluded. A total amount of 5205 patients were eligible for inclusion. Two equal and weight depending doses of TXA were given, preoperative as an oral dose and intravenously at wound closure. The primary outcome was blood transfusion rate. Further analysis on patient characteristics (e.g. age, gender), blood loss, perioperative haemoglobin (Hb) levels and complication/readmission rate was performed. A total of 49 (0.9%) patients received perioperative allogenic blood transfusions. Mean age, distribution of gender, body-mass index, American Society of Anaesthesiologists score, duration of surgery, type of arthroplasty, estimated blood loss, perioperative Hb levels and length of stay were statistically significant different between transfused and not-transfused patients. The incidence of thromboembolic adverse events (e.g. deep vein thrombosis/lung embolism) was 0.5%. Low blood transfusion rate was found after implementation of a standardized perioperative TXA protocol for primary hip and knee arthroplasty.

2021 ◽  
Vol 87 (3) ◽  
pp. 479-486
Author(s):  
Alpaslan Öztürk ◽  
Yavuz Akalin ◽  
Nazan Çevik ◽  
Özgür Avcı ◽  
Oğuz Çetin ◽  
...  

Patients applied with simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasty (SBTKA) with the administration of intravenous or intra-articular tranexamic acid (TXA) were compared in respect of blood loss and the need for allogenic blood transfusion. Of a total 53 patients applied with SBTKA, 32(60%) were administered intravenous TXA and 21(40%) intra-articular TXA. The patients were evaluated in respect of age, gender, height, weight, body mass index (BMI), body blood volume, preoperative and 1,2,3 and 4 days postoperative levels of hemoglobin (Hb) and hematocrit (Htc) and the change in Hb levels, estimated blood loss, mean actual blood loss, the need for allogenic blood transfusion (ABT) and the use or not of a drain. No difference was determined between the intravenous and intra-articular groups in respect of mean age, gender, height, weight, and body blood volume. No difference was determined between the groups in preoperative and postoperative mean Hb and Hct values, the reduction in mean Hb postoperatively, estimated blood loss, or the need for ABT. No deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism was determined in any patient. In the application of SBTKA, TXA can be safely administered by the intravenous or intra-articular route to reduce the need for ABT. The results of this study determined no difference in efficacy between the routes of application. For patients with a risk of intravenous use, intra-articular application can be preferred.


2015 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 39-45 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Liu ◽  
Michael Dan ◽  
Natalie Adivi

Peri-operative blood management is one of a number of components important for successful patient care in total joint arthroplasty and surgeons should be proactive in its application. The aims of blood conservation are to reduce the risks of blood transfusion whilst at the same time maximizing haemaglobin in the post-operative period, thereby leading to a positive effect on early and long term outcomes and costs. An individualized strategy based on patient specific risk factors, anticipated blood loss and co-morbidities is useful in achieving this aim. Multiple blood conservation strategies are available in the pre-operative, intra-operative and post-operative periods and can be utilised either individually or in combination. Recent literature has highlighted the importance of identifying and correcting pre-operative anaemia, salvaging peri-operative red cells and the use of tranexamic acid in reducing blood loss. Given total hip and knee arthroplasty is an elective procedure, a zero allogenic blood transfusion rate should be the aim and an achievable goal. 


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Viju Daniel Varghese ◽  
David Liu ◽  
Donald Ngo ◽  
Suzanne Edwards

Abstract Background Prevalence of anaemia in patients planned for total hip and knee arthroplasty is about 20%. Optimising preoperative haemoglobin levels by iron supplementation has been shown to decrease transfusion rates, complications and associated morbidity. The need for universal screening with iron studies of all elective arthroplasty patients is not clearly defined at present. Methods Retrospective review of 2 sequential cohorts of patients undergoing primary hip or knee arthroplasty by a single surgeon at a single centre between January 2013 and December 2017. The first group of patients underwent pre-operative iron studies only if found to be anaemic, with a haemoglobin below 12g/dL. From January 2015 all patients irrespective of the presence of anaemia were screened with a complete iron profile before surgery. Patients with a confirmed iron deficiency were administered with intravenous iron prior to surgery. The 2 cohorts were compared with regards to blood transfusion rate post-operatively and cost efficiency for universal screening with iron studies. Results There was a net decrease in allogenic blood transfusion rate from 4.76–2.92% when universal iron studies were introduced but the difference was not statistically significant. Obtaining universal pre-operative iron studies is cost neutral with the price of allogenic blood transfusion in a similar cohort. We also diagnosed 5 patients with occult malignancies. Conclusions Universal screening with pre-operative iron studies and iron infusion in elective arthroplasty patients may reduce allogenic blood requirements and is cost neutral. An additional benefit is the potential to diagnose asymptomatic malignancies. Further studies are required to show the true benefit of universal pre-operative iron screening.


Author(s):  
Viju Daniel Varghese ◽  
David Liu ◽  
Donald Ngo ◽  
Suzanne Edwards

Abstract Background The prevalence of anaemia in patients planned for total hip and knee arthroplasty is about 20%. Optimising pre-operative haemoglobin levels by iron supplementation has been shown to decrease transfusion rates, complications and associated morbidity. The need for universal screening with iron studies of all elective arthroplasty patients is not clearly defined at present. Methods Retrospective review of 2 sequential cohorts of patients undergoing primary hip or knee arthroplasty by a single surgeon at a single centre between January 2013 and December 2017. The first group of patients underwent pre-operative iron studies only if found to be anaemic, with a haemoglobin below 12g/dl. From January 2015, all patients irrespective of the presence of anaemia were screened with a complete iron profile before surgery. Patients with a confirmed iron deficiency were administered with intravenous iron prior to surgery. The 2 cohorts were compared with regard to blood transfusion rate post-operatively and cost efficiency for universal screening with iron studies. Results There was a net decrease in the allogenic blood transfusion rate from 4.76 to 2.92% when universal iron studies were introduced but the difference was not statistically significant. Obtaining universal pre-operative iron studies is cost neutral with the price of allogenic blood transfusion in a similar cohort. We also diagnosed 5 patients with occult malignancies. Conclusions Universal screening with pre-operative iron studies and iron infusion in elective arthroplasty patients may reduce allogenic blood requirements and is cost neutral. An additional benefit is the potential to diagnose asymptomatic malignancies. Further studies are required to show the true benefit of universal pre-operative iron screening.


2020 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 94-104
Author(s):  
Liang Sun ◽  
Rui Guo ◽  
Yi Feng

Background: Tranexamic acid (TXA) has been widely used during craniofacial and orthognathic surgery (OS). However, results of the literature are inconsistent due to specific type of surgery and a small sample of studies. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the role of TXA in bimaxillary OS. Methods: We performed a comprehensive literature search of PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and EMBASE to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared effect of TXA on bimaxillary OS with placebo. Outcomes of interests included intraoperative blood loss, allogenic transfusion, operation time, and volume of irrigation fluid. Random effects models were chosen considering that heterogeneity between studies was anticipated, and I 2 statistics were used to test for the presence of heterogeneity. Results: Totally 6 RCTs were identified. Tranexamic acid resulted in significantly reduced intraoperative blood loss (weighted mean difference [WMD] = −264.82 mL; 95% CI: −380.60 to −149.04 mL) and decreased amounts of irrigation fluid (WMD = −229.23 mL; 95% CI: −399.63 to −58.83 mL). However, TXA had no remarkable impact on risk of allogenic blood transfusion (pooled risk ratio = 0.50; 95% CI: 0.20-1.23), operation time (WMD = −8.71 min; 95% CI: −20.98 to 3.57 min), and length of hospital stay (WMD = −0.24 day; 95% CI: −0.62 to 0.14 day). No TXA-associated severe adverse reactions or complications were observed. Conclusions: Currently available meta-analysis reveals that TXA is effective in decreasing intraoperative blood loss; however, it does not reduce the risk of allogenic blood transfusion in bimaxillary OS.


Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 1181-1181
Author(s):  
John Murnaghan ◽  
Yulia Lin ◽  
Helen Razmjou ◽  
Jeffrey Gollish ◽  
Deborah Murnaghan

Abstract Abstract 1181 Use of allogeneic blood in elective procedures should be minimized due to risks of transfusion, potential adverse impact on outcomes, inconvenience to the patient, high cost and limited supply of blood. The purpose of this study was to examine the rate of transfusion following elective total hip (THA) and total knee arthroplasties (TKA) within a preoperative and perioperative blood management program and to examine the relationship between clinical and surgical parameters and blood transfusion. Methods: This was a secondary analysis of prospectively collected data of all consented patients who had undergone joint arthroplasty surgery between January and December, 2011. All patients attended a preoperative clinic 7–14 days prior to their surgery. The preoperative hemoglobin (Hgb) was measured. Transfusion rate was calculated for type of surgery (primary vs. revision and unilateral vs. bilateral). Impact of preoperative Hgb, age, sex, Body Mass Index (BMI), estimated blood loss, type of anaesthetic, type of anticoagulant (rivaroxaban vs. no rivaroxaban), surgeon and drop in hemoglobin (preoperative hemoglobin minus lowest post-operative hemoglobin documented on postoperative day 1, 2 or 3) were examined. Descriptive statistics examined the rate of transfusion in different procedures. Univariate analysis examined the relationship between each factor and having a transfusion. Stepwise logistic regression examined the impact of all factors together. Statistical significance was set at p<0.05. Results: 1605 patients [989 females (62%), mean age 66 (SD:11)] had surgery during 2011. Primary TKA: Unilateral 821 (51%), Bilateral TKA: 41 (3%), Revision TKA: 91 (6%), Primary THA: 588 (37%), Bilateral THA: 4 (0.02%), Revision THA: 60 (4%). Four percent (4%) of females had an Hgb <120 mg/L and 3% of males had an Hgb <130 mg/L at the preoperative visit. There were 1555 cases done under regional anaesthesia (spinal or epidural) and 129 cases received a general anaesthetic. Sixty-seven patients (4%) had a blood transfusion while in hospital. Thirty percent (30%) of the transfused women and 9% of the men had a low pre-operative Hgb. THA procedures required more transfusions than TKA (p=0.0012). Transfusion was associated with the following individual factors: age ≥ 80 years, female sex, low BMI (<18.5), increased estimated blood loss, larger drop in hemoglobin, type of anticoagulant (4% in rivaroxaban vs. 8% in non-rivaroxaban), revision surgery (vs. primary), simultaneous bilateral arthroplasty, general anesthesia (vs. spinal), and surgeon. Stepwise logistic regression analysis maintained the intra-operative blood loss, drop in Hgb, female sex, and age as significant independent factors in explaining the variation in blood transfusion. Discussion: This study was carried out in an independent orthopaedic facility for elective joint surgery. All patients are assessed medically prior to surgery and advised to take supplemental iron for 2 months prior to surgery. Four percent of females and 3% of males were found to be anemic preoperatively. Patients are admitted the morning of their surgery. Approximately 97% of the consented patients had a regional anesthetic (spinal and/or epidural) with sedation. Patients are transferred into the operating room after the anaesthetic was administered. Surgery is carried out without the routine use of cell saver, tranexamic acid or drains. Approximately 50% of the surgeons deflate the tourniquet in a total knee arthroplasty prior to closure of the capsule. Thromboprophylaxis is initiated with rivaroxaban 10 mg on postoperative day 1. The general transfusion trigger for symptomatic patients is a hemoglobin of 80 g/L. Transfusions can be ordered by staff surgeon, hospitalist, medical consultant or Orthopaedic fellow. The blood bank does not group and screen patients scheduled for routine primary total hip or total knee arthroplasty. Following these practices, we observed a transfusion rate for primary THA of 5% and primary TKA of 3% while using rivaroxaban for thromboprophylaxis starting on postoperative day 1. Conclusion: The present study confirmed that intra-operative blood loss, drop in the hemoglobin, being a female, and older than 80 years of age as risk factors in relation to need for blood transfusion following elective total joint arthroplasty. Transfusion rates were not higher when rivaroxaban was used for thromboprophylaxis. Disclosures: Murnaghan: Bayer Healthcare: Honoraria, Research Funding. Off Label Use: Rivaroxaban was used perioperatively for thromboprophylaxis. Our protocol gave the intial dose on postoperative day 1 rather than the 6–10 hours post-operatively recommended by the manufacturer in product monograph. Gollish:Bayer Healthcare: Honoraria, Research Funding.


2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sachiyuki Tsukada ◽  
Kenji Kurosaka ◽  
Masahiro Nishino ◽  
Tetsuyuki Maeda ◽  
Yoshiharu Yonekawa ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Intra-articular tranexamic acid (TXA) as an adjunct to intravenous TXA was reported to decrease perioperative blood loss during unilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, there have been no randomized controlled trials comparing intravenous versus combined intravenous and intra-articular TXA administration in patients undergoing simultaneous bilateral TKA. Methods We randomly assigned 77 patients with 154 involved knees undergoing simultaneous bilateral TKA to the intravenous TXA group (intra-articular placebo for each knee) or combined TXA group (1000 mg of intra-articular TXA for each knee) with 1:1 treatment allocation. In both groups, 1000 mg of TXA was given intravenously twice, just before surgery and 6 h after the initial administration. Other perioperative medications, surgical procedures, and blood management strategies were the same for all patients. The primary outcome was perioperative blood loss calculated from blood volume and change in hemoglobin from preoperative to postoperative day 3. Results Intention-to-treat analysis showed no statistically significant differences in perioperative blood loss until postoperative day 3 (1067 ± 403 mL in the intravenous TXA group vs. 997 ± 345 mL in the combined TXA group [95% CI, − 240 to 100 mL], P = 0.42). No patients required allogenic blood transfusion. The incidence of thrombotic events did not differ between groups (12% in the intravenous TXA group vs. 9% in the combined TXA group; P = 0.73). Conclusions The addition of intra-articular TXA did not reduce perioperative blood loss in patients undergoing simultaneous bilateral TKA compared with placebo. Trial registration University Hospital Medical Information Network UMIN000026137. Registered 14 February 2017.


2017 ◽  
Vol 31 (03) ◽  
pp. 270-276 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hernan Prieto ◽  
Heather Vincent ◽  
Justin Deen ◽  
Dane Iams ◽  
Hari Parvataneni

AbstractTranexamic acid (TXA) can reduce blood loss and decrease transfusion rates after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The purpose of our study was to evaluate the efficacy of TXA in a homogenous, consecutive cohort of patients undergoing simultaneous bilateral primary TKA. This was a retrospective study of 50 consecutive patients who underwent bilateral simultaneous primary TKA between 2011 and 2015. Of these, 20 patients received TXA and 30 patients did not receive TXA and served as the control group. Primary outcome measurements were intraoperative estimated blood loss, hemoglobin (Hb) and Hematocrit (Hct) levels on postoperative day (POD) 1 and POD2, and blood transfusion rates. Secondary outcomes included length of stay (LOS), knee flexion/extension range of motion (ROM), and postoperative complications. There was no difference between groups for preoperative Hb and Hct (all p > 0.05). The TXA group demonstrate higher Hb levels at POD1 (11.7 in TXA vs. 10.4 controls; p < 0.001) and POD2 (10.5 in TXA vs. 9.6 controls; p < 0.001), as well as higher Hct levels at POD1 (35.6 in TXA vs. 32.1 controls; p < 0.001) and POD2 (31.9 in TXA vs. 29.3 controls; p < 0.001). There was less percentage variation in Hb levels in the TXA group from preoperative to POD1 (17.7% in TXA vs. 25.7% controls; p < 0.0001) and POD2 (26.1% TXA vs. 31.8% controls; p = 0.019). Similarly, less percentage variation in Hct levels in the TXA group from presurgery to POD1 (17.0% TXA vs. 25.7% controls; p < 0.0001) and POD2 (25.0% TXA vs. 31.3% controls; p = 0.005). A total of 23.3% of patients in the control group required transfusions compared with no patients in the TXA (p = 0.044). There were no differences in LOS, knee ROM, or number of complications. No thromboembolic events occurred. TXA in bilateral simultaneous TKA effectively reduces blood loss, maintains postoperative Hb and Hct levels, and significantly decreases blood transfusion rates. The level of evidence is level III (therapeutic study).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document