Effect of Storage and Temperature on Flexibility of Natural and Synthetic Rubbers
Abstract A new method for measuring the flexibility of rubber has been described. The method consists essentially in determining the stress-strain curve obtained by loading and unloading a loop formed from a one-inch by six-inch strip cut from a test slab. A coefficient of flexibility independent of the thickness of the sample and, in addition, information on per cent resilience were obtained. By the use of the method described, the behavior of various natural and synthetic rubber gas mask facepiece compounds was studied during one month to three months' exposure at various temperatures down to −20° F. Progressive stiffening probably due to crystallization was found for natural rubber, GR-I, and GR-M compounds at low temperatures. No tendency to crystallize was noted for the GR-S compound. Of the crystallizable polymers GR-I was the most resistant, and GR-M the least resistant to stiffening during low temperature storage. It is of course evident that different polymers have inherently different degrees of resistance to low temperatures. Disregarding these inherent differences the work reported indicates that the resistance of elastomer compounds to stiffening during prolonged low temperature storage is favored by the following: 1. Use of interpolymers made from monomer mixtures having a relatively large proportion of each component, thus obtaining mutual intereference with crystallization. 2. Use of a “tight” cure which probably so impedes the movement of the polymer chains as to make crystallization difficult.