Yield Stress in Frozen Rubbers
Abstract The work reported on the low temperature shear deformation properties of natural rubber and Neoprene-GN gum compounds shows that, under the conditions of storage and applied stress investigated, there is little evidence of a yield effect with Neoprene-GN. It is suggested that the very large temperature-stiffening of this polymer is too great to give the yield effect under the low shear stresses studied. In tension, however, the yield effect is very marked with Neoprene-GN. On the other hand, a definite yield effect is shown as a result of shear deformation measurements on natural rubber stored at −40° C, whereas previous tension tests failed to detect this. It is shown that, under suitable conditions of storage time and at high shearing stresses, a natural rubber unit might fail in service by yielding and giving too much deflection. The more usual type of failure of a shear unit in service arises from loss of flexibility and hence deflection properties; the oil-resisting rubbers are particularly likely to suffer from this defect. The x-ray data on natural rubber and Neoprene-GN gum compounds failed to reveal any evidence of random crystallite formation in the unstretched frozen rubbers. If the yield effect is due to crystallite formation in the unstretched state at low temperatures, then the crystallites are too small to be detected under the conditions of this investigation. In this connection, it is emphasized that a temperature of −40° C is below the temperature for maximum rate of development of crystallization for both rubbers. With both natural rubber and Neoprene-GN, crystallization resulting from stretching occurs more readily and at lower elongations at −40° C than at room temperature. In the case of Neoprene-GN stored at −40° C and then stretched, crystallization does not increase with elongation as it does at room temperature. It is suggested that this is due to the cold-drawn state of Neoprene-GN on stretching after storage at −40° C. These investigations have important practical and theoretical implications. Suggestions have often been made to include a test for crystallization in any characterization of compounds for low-temperature resistance. The results of the present work emphasize that the important factor is the time of storage at low temperature and the effects that this produces on crystallization and yield stress. The presence of crystallization is not so important as its continued development under long period exposure or its reorientation under applied stress.