scholarly journals Land-Use Controls, Natural Restrictions, and Urban Residential Land Prices

Author(s):  
Krisandra Guidry ◽  
James D. Shilling ◽  
C.F. Sirmans
1975 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 225-242 ◽  
Author(s):  
Max Neutze

ABSTRACTWestern governments often attempt to regulate the use of privately owned urban land, while still relying on private landowners and developers to initiate development. This requires restrictions on the ways owners can develop their land, which restricts supply and increases land prices. The incentive of landowners to maximize the value of their land leads them to resist any restrictions on their right to develop.Different countries have responded to these difficulties in achieving land use policy objectives in different ways. In the United States, and to a lesser degree Australia, the private market largely determines the way cities grow and land use planning has only a minor influence. In Sweden and the Netherlands most land for development is purchased by the municipalities who also initiate the development. Britain, with strong land use controls, still relies on private development initiatives. Those controls restrict the land available and contribute to high land prices.


1975 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 751
Author(s):  
Robert Warren ◽  
David Listokin ◽  
W. Patrick Beaton ◽  
Franklin J. James ◽  
James W. Hughes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Land Use ◽  

2021 ◽  
pp. 089124242110061
Author(s):  
Robert W. Wassmer

The price of a new home is greater if the land to put it on costs more. In many U.S. metropolitan areas, this generates the widely acknowledged equity concern that low- to moderate-income households spend disproportionately on housing. But high residential land prices translating into high single-family home prices may also generate the efficiency concern of discouraging new workers’ entry into such areas or encouraging existing workers’ exit. The result could be a decrease in economic activity. This research offers panel-data regression evidence in support of the existence of this adverse outcome. Perhaps these findings can raise the saliency of the needed state or federal government intervention to curtail the stringency of local residential land-use regulations. NIMBYs see these land-use regulations as in their jurisdiction’s best interest, but as demonstrated here, such restrictions impose additional metro-wide economic concerns.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document