scholarly journals Determining Complementary and Alternative Therapies Used in Women’s Infertility Treatment

Author(s):  
Tuba Güner Emül ◽  
Duygu Vefikuluçay Yılmaz ◽  
Aysu Buldum

INTRODUCTION: This descriptive study aimed to determine the complementary and alternative therapies used by women for infertility treatment. METHODS: The sample of the study comprised 102 infertile women admitted to the out patient reproductive clinic of a university hospital between November 2017 and May 2018. Data were obtained by using a personal information form prepared by the researchers and consisting of questions that ask for the kinds of complementary and alternative treatments that infertile women have used and by using the “Complementary and Alternative Medicine Approaches Scale.” The data were evaluated by using SPSS for Windows 20.0 package program using number, percentage, mean, standard deviation, chi-square test and Student’s t-test. The statistical significance level was accepted as p<.05. RESULTS: It was determined that 59.7% of the women included in the study were between the ages of 31–40 and 38.2% were university graduates. Of the women, 58.8% worked, 69.6% had income equivalent to expenses and 79.4% had a nuclear family structure. In the study, 61.8% of women used complementary or alternative treatments. Of them, 87.3% prayed, 86.2% went to neighbors, 68.6% performed ritual prayers, 45.1% turned to cognitive behavioral approaches. Furthermore, 61.8% of the women consumed honey,56.9% carob,53.9% garlic, and 45.1% omega capsules were used as nutritional treatments. It was found that 33.3% of the women who could not have children naturally used manipulative and energy approaches such as rubbing their wrists with cologne, 16.4% performed cupping, and 11.9% went to bioenergy specialists. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: It is very important to know the complementary and alternative treatments used by infertile women wanting to have children. It is very important for nurses to know whether their patients’ use of complementary and alternative therapies and what methods they use, and to prevent the occurrence of side effects in the difficult and long process of treatment. Inline with the results of this research, it is recommended that qualitative studies on complementary and integrated practices be conducted and that midwives and nurses receive training for complementary and integrated practices.

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dania Jaber ◽  
Rafat Abu Ghannam ◽  
Waleed Rashed ◽  
Mohammad Shehadeh ◽  
Sa’ed H. Zyoud

Abstract Background Generally, complementary and alternative therapies (CAT) are accepted methods of treatment by patients with various types of conditions. Their use is becoming especially prevalent among patients with eye problems even in developed countries. Thus, we aimed to determine the pattern of use of CAT in this patient population, to identify the patient characteristics associated with the use of CAT, and to assess the types of CAT used. Methods A descriptive, cross-sectional study was conducted in Palestine at An-Najah National University Hospital between the time periods of October 2019 to May 2020, using questionnaire-based face to face interviews. Data were collected through convenience sampling. Patients responded to the questionnaire, which was focused on information adapted from previous research in this area, covering socio-demographic and clinical characteristics, types of CAT, source of information, and side effects on CAT use. Results A total of 86 patients were interviewed for our study. Over two thirds, 67% reported using CAT for the specific purpose of improving their eye condition, and about one third (29.1%) received more than one therapy. The most common therapies reported were duea’ (i.e. supplication) (47.1%) and herbal therapies (24.1%). It was shown that patients with bilateral involvement of their eyes were almost twice more likely to describe using CAT than patients with unilateral eye pathology (p = 0.006). Also, patients who underwent surgery as their route of treatment were significantly less likely to use CAT (p = 0.043). Most of our study participants mentioned a non-physician source as their source of information regarding CAT with family members being the most frequently mentioned (30.2%) followed by the internet (25.6%) and friends (19.8%). Conclusions The prevalence of CAT use among patients with eye disease is somewhat high in our study population. Because CAT may trigger adverse reactions, influence the progression of the disease, and interfere with conventional treatment, the ophthalmologist should frequently be asked patients with such diagnostics regarding the use of these therapies. Further work is required to analyze the mechanisms of action and to establish realistic guidelines for the use of these modalities.


2005 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-26
Author(s):  
Brian A Enebo ◽  
Lisa Corbin ◽  
David P Gilkey ◽  
Martha Soledad Vela-Acosta ◽  
Thomas J Keefe ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Tabitha Heller ◽  
Christof Kloos ◽  
Nicolle Mueller ◽  
Josef Roemelt ◽  
Christian Keinki ◽  
...  

AbstractBackgroundComplementary and alternative medicine (CAM) is used often by patients with different diseases. While some authors subsume religiousness and spirituality to CAM, others do not. The objective of the present study was to assess the prevalence and types of CAM usage as well as the participants' spirituality/religiousness in an outpatient department for endocrinology and metabolic diseases.MethodsAll individuals visiting the outpatient department at a German university hospital from April to June 2009 were offered a standardized questionnaire on the use of dietary supplements and alternative therapies as well as their religiousness/spirituality. Demographic and clinical data of 428 respondents were taken from the electronic health record.ResultsOf the respondents, 16.4% (n = 66) classified themselves to be religious/spiritual and 67.9% (n = 273) as not religious/spiritual. Women were more religious/spiritual than men (p = 0.02). 41.4% of the respondents used supplements and 27.4% additional therapies. The use of supplements and additional therapies was more frequent in people with higher religiousness/spirituality (p = 0.005 and p = 0.01,resp.) but there were no associations between religiousness/spirituality and the number of consultations, costs for drugs, appraisal of the physicians treatment methods, the perceived effectiveness of prescribed drugs, fear of late complications or of side effects.ConclusionsA higher religiousness/spirituality is associated with a more frequent use of supplements or additional therapies in individuals with endocrinopathies or metabolic diseases. As CAM has been shown to be associated with worse outcome, addressing religiousness/spirituality which stresses the responsibility of the person for his life might offer an additional resource and should be further studied.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document