scholarly journals De la oscura potencia de lo femenino en el pensamiento de F. Schelling

2021 ◽  
Vol 46 (1) ◽  
pp. 157-171
Author(s):  
María José Binetti
Keyword(s):  
Friedrich Schelling

Nacimiento, concepción y gestación, huevo cósmico, rueda eterna, noche, caos y oscuridad abisal son algunas de las imágenes que Friedrich Schelling asume a los efectos de reconceptualizar la especulación y, en concreto, de desfundar y superar el paradigma falogocéntrico del Acto trascendente, perfecto y pura luz. La propuesta schellingiana de un fundamento inmanente y material, pura potencia indeterminada e infinita, supone una re-sexualización del discurso filosófico que intentaremos mostrar en estas líneas.  

Friedrich Schelling

1997 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacques De Visscher
Keyword(s):  
Friedrich Schelling

scholarly journals A música em Schelling e o ritmo universal do absoluto

2011 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 44-59
Author(s):  
Evelyn G. Petersen de Barros
Keyword(s):  
Friedrich Schelling

O presente artigo visa problematizar a concepção de música proposta pelo filósofo Friedrich Schelling em sua obra ‘Filosofia da Arte’, na qual essa forma artística é concebida enquanto uma potência (Potenz) real do Absoluto. Desse modo, pretende-se apontar para o caráter inovador e peculiar da concepção schelliniana em contraste com a noção romântica de música absoluta, assim como situá-la dentro do panorama geral do sistema de identidades desenvolvido pelo autor.  

Myth

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
George S. Williamson
Keyword(s):  
Nineteenth Century ◽  
Eighteenth Century ◽  
First World War ◽  
Christian Theology ◽  
World War ◽  
Friedrich Schelling ◽  
The Bible ◽  
The First World War ◽  
First World

This chapter examines the nineteenth-century discourse on myth and its influence on Christian theological and cultural debate from the 1790s to the eve of the First World War. After preliminary comments on the eighteenth century, it examines five ‘key’ moments in this history: the Romantic idea of a ‘new mythology’ (focusing on Friedrich Schelling); the ‘religious’ turn in myth scholarship c.1810 (Friedrich Creuzer); debates over the role of myth in the gospels (focusing on David Strauss and Christian Weisse); theories of language and race and their impact on myth scholarship; and Arthur Drews’ The Christ Myth and the debate over the historicity of Jesus. This chapter argues that the discourse on myth (in Germany and elsewhere) was closely bound to the categories and assumptions of Christian theology, reproducing them even as it undermined the authority of the Bible, the clergy, and the churches.

Rhythmic Accent and the Absolute: Sulzer, Schelling and theAkzenttheorie

2013 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 277-286 ◽  
Author(s):  
TOMAS MCAULEY
Keyword(s):  
Eighteenth Century ◽  
Immanuel Kant ◽  
Contemporary Music ◽  
Philosophy Of Art ◽  
Friedrich Schelling ◽  
Philosophical Concept ◽  
Isaac Newton ◽  
The Absolute ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Ultimate Ground

ABSTRACT1770s Berlin saw the birth of a new theory of rhythm, first stated in Johann Georg Sulzer'sAllgemeine Theorie der schönen Künste(1771–1774), and later labelled theAkzenttheorie(theory of accents). Whereas previous eighteenth-century theories had seen rhythm as built up from the combination of distinct units, theAkzenttheoriesaw it as formed from the breaking down of a continual flow, achieved through the placing of accents on particular notes. In hisPhilosophie der Kunst(1802–1803) the philosopher Friedrich Schelling used Sulzer's definition of rhythm to suggest, astonishingly, that music can facilitate knowledge of the absolute, a philosophical concept denoting the ultimate ground of all reality. In this article I show how Schelling could come to interpret theAkzenttheoriein such extravagant terms by examining three theories of time and their relationships to rhythm: that of Sulzer and his predecessor Isaac Newton, that of Immanuel Kant and that of Schelling. I conclude by arguing that in Schelling's case – an important one, since his is the earliest systematic presentation of a view of music that came to predominate in the decades after 1800 – his view of music was driven neither by developments in contemporary music nor by changes in the philosophy of art as a discrete intellectual enterprise, but by revolutions in philosophy by and large unconcerned even with art in general.

scholarly journals Sistema de la libertad y sistema del tiempo en la obra de Friedrich Schelling

2018 ◽  
pp. 25-45
Author(s):  
Jorge Eduardo Fernández
Keyword(s):  
A Priori ◽  
Friedrich Schelling

Las cuestiones inherentes a la relación entre tiempo y libertad alcanzan su madurez en las obras de Hegel y Schelling. En el presente artículo atenderemos de manera particular a este último, ya que el camino abierto por sus Investigaciones sobre la esencia de la libertad humana (1809) deriva con cierta claridad en los sucesivos intentos de exposición de un sistema del tiempo en las Edades del mundo (1811, 1813, 1815) y en las Lecciones de München (1827-28). Siguiendo el desarrollo de Schelling, pues, intentaremos comprender por qué en el idealismo postkantiano la búsqueda de una filosofía del espíritu como sistema de la libertad conduce a tratar el “tiempo” ya no sólo como una intuición a priori de la sensibilidad sino como una determinación inherente al absoluto, y, en tal sentido, por qué en el pensamiento de Schelling sistema de la libertad y sistema del tiempo equivalen a la exposición del absoluto.

Self-Will Versus All-Will

2019 ◽  
pp. 145-167
Author(s):  
Fred Dallmayr
Keyword(s):  
Human Freedom ◽  
Friedrich Schelling ◽  
Sharp Distinction

The chapter engages the work of the philosopher Friedrich Schelling, especially his treatise on Human Freedom. Schelling placed human freedom into the cauldron of competing forces, especially the antagonism of individual selfishness and universal or holistic aspirations. The most destructive outcome of this cauldron is the usurpation of holistic “all-will” by an imperialistic “self-will,” usually leading to violence and imperial domination. For Schelling, this strife could only be overcome by integrating self-will into the bonding power of a broader relationality. The chapter then shifts to Heidegger’s lectures on Schelling and his endeavors to vindicate Schelling’s sharp distinction between relational freedom and arbitrary atomistic willfulness (involving a critique of self-centered liberalism or libertarianism).

scholarly journals Dimitrije Matic: Hegelianism and Naturalism

2015 ◽  
Vol 58 (1) ◽  
pp. 103-151
Author(s):  
Boris Milosavljevic
Keyword(s):  
Natural Philosophy ◽  
Foreign Minister ◽  
Short Review ◽  
History Of Philosophy ◽  
Christian Theology ◽  
Philosophy Of Law ◽  
Friedrich Schelling ◽  
Political Views ◽  
History Of ◽  
The Right

Dimitrije Matic (1821-1884) was a philosopher, jurist, professor of public law at the Belgrade Lyceum and politician. He served as Serbia?s Minister of Education and Church Affairs, acting Foreign Minister, Speaker of the Parliament, and member of the State Council. He was president of the Serbian Society of Letters and member of the Serbian Learned Society. Matic belonged to Serbian liberal-minded intellectual circles. He believed that the rule of force was unacceptable and that governments should promote and support popular education. Matic studied philosophy and law in Serbia (Kragujevac, Belgrade), Germany (Berlin, Heidelberg) and France (Paris), and received his doctorial degree in philosophy in Leipzig. In Berlin Matic embraced Hegel?s speculative philosophy and theory of state (philosophy of law). Among his professors were Georg Andreas Gabler (Hegel`s immediate successor), Otto Friedrich Gruppe, Wilhelm Vatke etc. In Halle he listened to another Hegelian, Johann Eduard Erdmann. He had the opportunity to attend Friedrich Schelling?s lectures on the philosophy of mythology. If the Right Hegelians developed Hegel?s philosophy along the lines they considered to be in accordance with Christian theology, and the Left Hegelians laid the emphasis on the anti-Christian tendencies of Hegel?s system and pushed it in the direction of materialism and socialism, Matic would be closer to the first. Actually, he was mostly influenced by his professor Karl Ludwig Michelet, with whom he established a lifelong friendship. Matic?s doctorial thesis (Dissertatio de via qua Fichtii, Schellingii, Hegeliique philosophia e speculativa investigatione Kantiana exculta sit) addressed the question of how the philosophy of Fichte, Schelling and Hegel developed from Kantian speculative thought. The paper deals with the question whether Matic took a shift from Hegelianism to Positivism (Naturalism) in the 1860s, which is a claim that was taken for granted in the Yugoslav (Serbian) Marxist histories of Serbian philosophy after the Second World War and Communist revolution. In fact, it is rooted in Milan Kujundzic-Aberdar?s (1842-1893) periodization of the Serbian philosophical literature. Kujundzic, professor of Philosophy at the Belgrade Great School, classified Matic?s Science of Education into the latest period of natural philosophy. In order to answer the question, the paper looks into the evolution of Matic?s philosophical, legal and political views. Matic followed Hegelian philosophy in his: Short Review (according to Hegel?s ? Psychology in Encyclopaedia of the Philosophical Sciences); Principles of Rational [Vernunftrecht] State Law [Staatslehre] according to Heinrich Zepfel?s book on the philosophy of law (Grunds?tze des allgemeinen und des konstitutionell-monarchischen Staatsrechts and Hegel?s Philosophy of Law) and History of Philosophy (according to Albert Schwegler?s History of Philosophy). There is nothing in Matic?s Science of Education that would corroborate the claim that he shifted from Hegelianism to Positivism. Though he had to attune his views to the changed, anti- Hegelian, intellectual climate and influences on academic life, he remained a Hegelian. The paper deals with the reasons why the Marxist histories of Serbian philosophy insisted on his alleged conversion.

Karl Rahner, Friedrich Schelling, and Original Plural Unity

2014 ◽  
Vol 75 (2) ◽  
pp. 284-307 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Joseph Fritz
Keyword(s):  
Karl Rahner ◽  
Friedrich Schelling
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document