scholarly journals Health sciences libraries’ subscriptions to journals: expectations of general practice departments and collection-based analysis

2018 ◽  
Vol 106 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
David Barreau ◽  
Céline Bouton ◽  
Vincent Renard ◽  
Jean-Pascal Fournier
Keyword(s):  
Medical Education ◽  
General Practice ◽  
Health Sciences ◽  
Reference List ◽  
Cross Sectional Survey ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Médecine Générale ◽  
Cochrane Database ◽  
Pédagogie Médicale ◽  
Language Of Publication

Objective: The aims of this study were to (i) assess the expectations of general practice departments regarding health sciences libraries’ subscriptions to journals and (ii) describe the current general practice journal collections of health sciences libraries.Methods: A cross-sectional survey was distributed electronically to the thirty-five university general practice departments in France. General practice departments were asked to list ten journals to which they expected access via the subscriptions of their health sciences libraries. A ranked reference list of journals was then developed. Access to these journals was assessed through a survey sent to all health sciences libraries in France. Adequacy ratios (access/need) were calculated for each journal.Results: All general practice departments completed the survey. The total reference list included 44 journals. This list was heterogeneous in terms of indexation/impact factor, language of publication, and scope (e.g., patient care, research, or medical education). Among the first 10 journals listed, La Revue Prescrire (96.6%), La Revue du Praticien–Médecine Générale (90.9%), the British Medical Journal (85.0%), Pédagogie Médicale (70.0%), Exercer (69.7%), and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (62.5%) had the highest adequacy ratios, whereas Family Practice (4.2%), the British Journal of General Practice (16.7%), Médecine (29.4%), and the European Journal of General Practice (33.3%) had the lowest adequacy ratios.Conclusions: General practice departments have heterogeneous expectations in terms of health sciences libraries’ subscriptions to journals. It is important for librarians to understand the heterogeneity of these expectations, as well as local priorities, so that journal access meets users’ needs.

Current Models for Inpatient and Emergency Room Ophthalmology Consultation in U.S. Residency Programs

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (02) ◽  
pp. e171-e174
Author(s):  
Donna H. Kim ◽  
Dongseok Choi ◽  
Thomas S. Hwang
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Medical Education ◽  
Emergency Room ◽  
Program Directors ◽  
Cross Sectional Survey ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Direct Supervision ◽  
Residency Programs ◽  
Residency Program Directors ◽  
Competency Assessments

Abstract Objective This article examines models of patient care and supervision for hospital-based ophthalmology consultation in teaching institutions. Design This is a cross-sectional survey. Methods An anonymous survey was distributed to residency program directors at 119 Accreditation Council for Graduated Medical Education accredited U.S. ophthalmology programs in the spring of 2018. Survey questions covered consult volume, rotational schedules of staffing providers, methods of supervision (direct vs. indirect), and utilization of consult-dedicated didactics and resident competency assessments. Results Of the 119 program directors, 48 (41%) completed the survey. Programs most frequently reported receiving 4 to 6 consults per day from the emergency department (27, 55.1%) and 4 to 6 consults per day from inpatient services (26, 53.1%). Forty-seven percent of programs reported that postgraduate year one (PGY-1) or PGY-2 residents on a dedicated consult rotation initially evaluate patients. Supervising faculty backgrounds included neuro-ophthalmology, cornea, comprehensive, or a designated chief of service. Staffing responsibility is typically shared by multiple faculty on a daily or weekly rotation. Direct supervision was provided for fewer of emergency room consults (1–30%) than for inpatient consults (71–99%). The majority of programs reported no dedicated didactics for consultation activities (27, 55.1%) or formal assessment for proficiency (33, 67.4%) prior to the initiation of call-related activities without direct supervision. Billing submission for consults was inconsistent and many consults may go financially uncompensated (18, 36.7%). Conclusion The majority of hospital-based ophthalmic consultation at academic centers is provided by a rotating pool of physicians supervising a lower level resident. Few programs validate increased levels of graduated independence using specific assessments.

scholarly journals Impact of conflict on medical education: a cross-sectional survey of students and institutions in Iraq

BMJ Open ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. e010460 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ashton Barnett-Vanes ◽  
Sondus Hassounah ◽  
Marwan Shawki ◽  
Omar Abdulkadir Ismail ◽  
Chi Fung ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Medical Education ◽  
Cross Sectional Survey ◽  
Cross Sectional

scholarly journals Exploring the global impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on medical education: an international cross-sectional study of medical learners

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Allison Brown ◽  
Aliya Kassam ◽  
Mike Paget ◽  
Kenneth Blades ◽  
Megan Mercia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Medical Education ◽  
Medical Training ◽  
Well Being ◽  
World Health ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Cross Sectional Survey ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
The World ◽  
Geographic Regions ◽  
The Impact

Background: The evidence surrounding the impact of COVID-19 on medical learners remains anecdotal and highly speculative despite the anticipated impact and potential consequences of the current pandemic on medical training. The purpose of this study was to explore the extent that COVID-19 initially impacted medical learners around the world and examine global trends and patterns across geographic regions and levels of training. Methods: A cross-sectional survey of medical learners was conducted between March 25–June 14, 2020, shortly after the World Health Organization declared COVID-19 a pandemic. Results: 6492 learners completed the survey from 140 countries. Most medical schools removed learners from the clinical environment and adopted online learning, but students reported concerns about the quality of their learning, training progression, and milestone fulfillment. Residents reported they could be better utilized and expressed concerns about their career timeline. Trainees generally felt under-utilized and wanted to be engaged clinically in meaningful ways; however, some felt that contributing to healthcare during a pandemic was beyond the scope of a learner. Significant differences were detected between levels of training and geographic regions for satisfaction with organizational responses as well as the impact of COVID-19 learner wellness and state-trait anxiety. Conclusions: The disruption to the status quo of medical education is perceived by learners across all levels and geographic regions to have negatively affected their training and well-being, particularly amongst postgraduate trainees. These results provide initial empirical insights into the areas that warrant future research as well as consideration for current and future policy planning.

scholarly journals Primary care workforce and continuous medical education in China: lessons to learn from a nationwide cross-sectional survey

BMJ Open ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (7) ◽  
pp. e015145 ◽  
Author(s):  
William C W Wong ◽  
ShanZhu Zhu ◽  
Jason J Ong ◽  
MingHui Peng ◽  
Cindy L K Lam ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Medical Education ◽  
Continuous Medical Education ◽  
Cross Sectional Survey ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Primary Care Workforce ◽  
Education In China

Medical Education During COVID-19: A Global Cross-Sectional Survey of Medical Student Experiences with Remote Learning

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Isabella Maria de Freitas Faria ◽  
Carolina B. Moura ◽  
Mariana Graner ◽  
Maria Luíza Cazumbá ◽  
Marcela Bittencourt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Medical Education ◽  
Medical Student ◽  
Student Experiences ◽  
Cross Sectional Survey ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Remote Learning

scholarly journals Couple relationship problems—a task for the general practitioner? A cross-sectional survey from Norway

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Siri Dalsmo Berge ◽  
Eivind Meland ◽  
Mette Brekke ◽  
Gunnar Tschudi Bondevik ◽  
Frode Thuen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
General Practice ◽  
General Practitioner ◽  
Regression Models ◽  
Good Health ◽  
Couple Relationship ◽  
Cross Sectional Survey ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Relationship Problems ◽  
Logistic Regression Models ◽  
General Practices

Abstract Background A healthy couple relationship is a predictor of good health. There is a lack of knowledge about what role family and couples counselling should have in general practice. Objectives To identify the prevalence of patients who have talked, or want to talk, with their general practitioner (GP) about their couple relationship, to investigate what characterizes these patients and to explore whether they believe that couple relationship problems should be dealt with in general practice. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional survey in 70 general practices in Norway during spring 2019. A questionnaire was answered by 2178 consecutive patients (response rate 75%) in GP waiting rooms. Data were examined using frequencies and linear and logistic regression models. Results We included 2097 responses. Mean age was 49.0 years and 61.3% were women. One in four (25.0%) had already talked with their GP about couple relationship problems, while one in three (33.5%) wanted to talk with their GP about their couple relationship problems. These patients more frequently had experience of divorce, poor self-rated health, an opinion that their couple relationship had a significant impact on their health and lower couple relationship quality when adjusted for age, sex, present marital status and children living at home. We found that 46.4% of patients believed that GPs should be interested in their couple relationship problems. Conclusion Relationship problems are frequently addressed in general practice. GPs should be prepared to discuss this issue to facilitate help for couples earlier than they might otherwise expect.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document