scholarly journals Narrative Refiguration of Social Events: Paul Ricoeur's Contribution to Rethinking the Social

2010 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 87-98 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Borisenkova

The analysis of events has been a central issue for social sciences for a long time. The problem of an event's definition and distinction is still at stake in sociological debates. The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate the contribution of Paul Ricoeur's narrative theory to social events studies. First, this is done through the explication of the concept in the framework of narrative approach. Secondly, the paper highlights the narrative's capacity of 'refiguring' the social by re-describing social events, subordinating their succession to the logic of story-telling and transforming temporal characteristics as well. Apart from some insights, interpretative explanations and illustrations the paper provides critical arguments concerning the limitations of Paul Ricoeur's narrative approach with respect to sociological event-analysis.     L'analyse des événements a toujours été une question centrale pour l'histoire et les sciences sociales. Le problème de la définition et de la distinction des événements est encore en jeu dans les débats sociologiques contemporains. L'objectif de cet article est de s'attarder sur la contribution de la théorie de Paul Ricœur aux études des événements sociaux.  Après avoir montré les limites d'une conception impersonnelle de l'événement, l'auteur se penche sur la solution narrative proposée par Ricœur, à savoir la capacité du récit à “refigurer” du Social par la re-description des événements sociaux. Il s'agit de soumettre la logique de la succession temporelle à la logique de la narration. Tout en rendant justice à la valeur heuristique de telles analyses (à travers une série d'explicitations et d'illustrations), l'article pointe les limites de l'approche narrative de Paul Ricœur au regard des analyses sociologique des événements.  

2020 ◽  
pp. 24-41
Author(s):  
Albena Yaneva

This chapter reviews several developments in the social sciences and the arts that date back to the 1990s and motivated this study of archives as practice. It refers to Jacques Derrida and Paul Ricoeur as key protagonists that led to the rethinking of the role of archiving as a tool of memory. It also details the emergence of the trend of “archival ethnography,” which witnessed the advent of the archival turn in anthropology. The chapter elaborates how archival scholarship took an empirical turn in the mid-1990s, coinciding with the “archive fever” in the arts and the “archival turn” in anthropology that opened venues for investigating architectural archiving. It explores the realm of architectural practice wherein the computer radically changed working dynamics and led to the practice's own archival turn in the mid-1990s.


2016 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 109-126
Author(s):  
Drance Elias da Silva

This Article may be situated within the rapport field between Philosophy and Social Sciences, at the search regarding to the concept concerning the Representation. Regarding to Philosophy, under a general view, the concept, concerning Representation, has been, since a long time, understood as a trail which one would get througl reaching to the real and true ones. Representation, as the thought contents expression form had not been known departing from Philosophy as a barrier against the objectivity concerning the knowledge. Representation, in its source, has been constituting itself a cognictive, inmanent reflection, related to the conscience inner subjectivity. But departing from the episthemological point of view, it has been not so easy for the campus concerning the Culture Sciences as a totality. In the theory regarding to knowledge, the Social Sciences campus and, more specifically, in the human life Symbolic dimension constitutive aspects, it has been, often, accepted negatively as an entry door for the histotical social reality. Nowadays, one may conclude that the contents concerning the Culture are deeply rooted within the histotical reality, which may present new dimension the reading regarding to the Symbolical side concerning the human life, under the view regarding to the unseen aspect, such as the intellectualistic Western dominant Culture allows understanding the way which could be in.


1968 ◽  
Vol 7 (6) ◽  
pp. 199-212

Cette bibliographie a été prépa rée par le Service d'Échange d'Infor mations Scientifiques de la Maison des Sciences de l'Honmme à Paris, sous la responsabilité de Mme M.F. Essyad, et prend la suite de celle qui a été publiée dans le volume 6 (6), décembre 1967. Elle recense les prin cipales études qui traitent explicite ment de concepts utilisés dans les sciences sociales. Ces concepts sont présentés en français et en anglais de manière à faciliter un dépistage dans ces deux langues.


Etyka ◽  
1970 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. 133-140
Author(s):  
Janina Tobera

For a long time the representatives of the social sciences had been passionately interested in whether certain identities in the moral aspect of different cultures, which are so numerous and different, can be found.


Author(s):  
Jürgen Osterhammel

The revival of world history towards the end of the twentieth century was intimately connected with the rise of a new master concept in the social sciences: globalization. Historians and social scientists responded to the same generational experience that the interconnectedness of social life on the planet had arrived at a new level of intensity. The conclusions drawn from this insight in the various academic disciplines diverged considerably. The early theorists of globalization in sociology, political science, and economics disdained a historical perspective. The new concept seemed ideally suited to grasp the characteristic features of contemporary society. It helped to pinpoint the very essence of present-day modernity. Globalization opened up a way towards the social science mainstream, provided elements of a fresh terminology to a field that had suffered for a long time from an excess of descriptive simplicity.


2008 ◽  
Vol 47 (1) ◽  
pp. 31-54
Author(s):  
Johann Michel

Les recherches menées en sciences sociales présupposent le plus souvent, implicitement ou explicitement, une anthropologie fondamentale, c'est-à-dire une réflexion sur l'homme en tant qu'homme, sur les traits structurants de la condition humaine. Cet article se focalise sur l'anthropologie philosophique de Paul Ricoeur. La thèse défendue par l'auteur consiste à montrer que cette anthropologie, en raison de son équivocité et de ses remaniements, peut se refléter dans deux paradigmes tenus pour antagonistes en sciences sociales. D'une part, un paradigme d'inspiration structuraliste que l'on rencontre par exemple dans la sociologie critique de Pierre Bourdieu. D'autre part, un paradigme d'inspiration phénoménologique que l'on rencontre par exemple dans la sociologie de la société critique de Luc Boltanski.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document