scholarly journals Best treatment option for clinical stage I seminoma patients

1997 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. 405-407 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Krege ◽  
G. Kalund ◽  
T. Otto ◽  
M. Goepel ◽  
H. Rübben

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (35) ◽  
pp. 4677-4681 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jorge Aparicio ◽  
Pablo Maroto ◽  
Xavier García del Muro ◽  
Josep Gumà ◽  
Alfonso Sánchez-Muñoz ◽  
...  

Purpose To confirm the efficacy of a risk-adapted treatment approach for patients with clinical stage I seminoma. The aim was to reduce both the risk of relapse and the proportion of patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy while maintaining a high cure rate. Patients and Methods From 2004 to 2008, 227 patients were included after orchiectomy in a multicenter study. Eighty-four patients (37%) presented no local risk factors, 44 patients (19%) had tumors larger than 4 cm, 25 patients (11%) had rete testis involvement, and 74 patients (33%) had both criteria. Only the latter group received two courses of adjuvant carboplatin, whereas the rest were managed by surveillance. Results After a median follow-up time of 34 months, 16 relapses (7%) have been documented (15 [9.8%] among patients on surveillance and one [1.4%] among those treated with carboplatin). All relapses occurred in retroperitoneal lymph nodes, except for one case in pelvic nodes. Median node size was 25 mm, and median time to recurrence was 14 months. All patients were rendered disease-free with chemotherapy. The actuarial 3-year disease-free survival rate was 88.1% (95% CI, 82.3% to 93.9%) for patients on surveillance and 98.0% (95% CI, 94.0% to 100%) for those treated with adjuvant chemotherapy. Overall 3-year survival was 100%. Conclusion With the limitations of the short follow-up duration, we confirm that a risk-adapted approach is effective for stage I seminoma. Adjuvant carboplatin seems adequate treatment for patients with 2 risk criteria, as is active surveillance for those with 0 to one risk factors. More reliable predictive factors are needed to improve the applicability of this model.


2010 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 92-95 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xue-Qi Zhang ◽  
Zhuo-Wei Liu ◽  
Fang-Jian Zhou ◽  
Hui Han ◽  
Zi-Ke Qin ◽  
...  

2003 ◽  
Vol 14 (6) ◽  
pp. 867-872 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Aparicio ◽  
X. García del Muro ◽  
P. Maroto ◽  
L. Paz-Ares ◽  
E. Alba ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ken Kato ◽  
Hiroyasu Igaki ◽  
Yoshinori Ito ◽  
Isao Nozaki ◽  
Hiroyuki Daiko ◽  
...  

7 Background: Esophagectomy (E) is the standard of care for stage I esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), while chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is a treatment option. A parallel-group controlled trial including randomized arms to confirm the non-inferiority of CRT to E for stage IA ESCC was conducted. Methods: Patients (pts) with thoracic ESCC, adenosquamous cell, or basaloid cell carcinoma with stage IA (T1bN0M0), age 20 to 75, performance status 0 to 1, and adequate organ function were eligible. If pts accepted randomization, they were randomly allocated to E with 2-3 field lymph node dissection (arm A) or CRT (arm B). However, if pts had a preference and refused randomization, they were allocated to pts preference arm, E (arm C) or CRT (arm D). CRT consisted of cisplatin and 5-FU, with radiation at the dose of 60 Gy concurrently. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) of arm A and B, secondary endpoint included OS of arm C and D using inverse probability weighting with propensity score. The planned sample size in arm A and B was 114 pts in total with one-sided alpha of 10%, power of 75% and non-inferiority margin of HR as 1.78. The sample size in arm C and D was at least 156 pts in each arm with one-sided alpha of 2.5%, power of 85% and non-inferiority margin of HR as 1.78. Results: Between December 2006 and February 2013, 379 (Arm A: 4, B: 7, C: 209 C, D: 159) pts were enrolled. Primary endpoint was not calculated due to small number of randomized arms. Patients characteristics of arm C and D were as follows; median age: 62 and 65, male (%): 82.8 and 88.1, PS 0 (%): 99.5 and D 98.1. All histologic type was SCC except one basaloid cell carcinoma in arm C. The 3- and 5-year OS were 94.7% and 86.5% in arm C, and 93.1% and 85.5% in arm D (adjusted HR 1.05; 95% CI 0.67-1.64 [< 1.78]).Treatment related death were observed in two pts in arm C and none in arm D. Conclusions: Though the accrual of randomized arms was shortened, CRT showed trend toward non-inferiority compared to E in pts preference arms. CRT is considered as a treatment option for stage IA ESCC with organ preservation. Clinical trial information: UMIN000000551.


2009 ◽  
Vol 181 (4S) ◽  
pp. 325-325
Author(s):  
Hannes Steiner ◽  
Karl Scheiber ◽  
Brigitte Stoehr ◽  
Nicolai Leonhartsberger ◽  
Andreas Fritzer ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document