scholarly journals LUNG METASTATIC DISEASE: SURGICAL RESECTION AND LOCOREGIONAL CHEMOTHERAPY

2012 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 185-205
Author(s):  
Willem A. Den Hengst ◽  
Jeroen M. H. Hendriks ◽  
Paul E. Y. Van Schil
2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (Supplement_6) ◽  
pp. vi218-vi218
Author(s):  
Rebecca Anderson ◽  
Liberty Bonestroo ◽  
Christopher Spencer

Abstract PURPOSE To examine outcomes in patients undergoing linear accelerator (LINAC) based fractionated stereotactic radiosurgery (fSRS) to 30 Gy in 5 fractions. METHODS We completed a retrospective review of patients with brain metastases treated with 5-fraction LINAC fSRS at Phelps Health. All patients with CNS metastatic disease treated with fSRS were included in the study. Incidence of symptomatic radionecrosis (sRN), local brain failure (LBF), time to death, target volume and dose, prior whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT), prior surgical resection, and concurrent immunotherapy were assessed. sRN was defined as grade 2 or higher per CTCAE v4.0. RESULTS From 2016–2019, 28 patients and 60 lesions were treated. The most common metastasis histology was non-small cell lung cancer (n = 22), renal cell carcinoma (n = 12), and melanoma (n = 11). Median follow-up time was 6.49 months (range 0.33 – 23.96). Of 60 lesions, three lesions developed sRN and one asymptomatic patient developed radiographic evidence of radiation necrosis. Mean GTV was 1.03cm3 in patients with sRN. Of 57 lesions without sRN, median GTV was 1.45cm3 (range 0.11 - 20.1). Mean time to sRN was 3.17 months. Two symptomatic patients received prior WBRT. One symptomatic patient received concurrent immunotherapy. No symptomatic patients had surgical resection prior to fSRS. Among 24 lesions without prior radiation, 1 (4.2%) developed sRN. 10 lesions underwent surgical resection prior to fSRS with none developing sRN. 34 lesions were treated with concurrent immunotherapy and one developed sRN (2.9%). Local failure occurred in 9 lesions (15%). Median time to death for all patients was 4.50 months (range 1.02 - 19.40). CONCLUSIONS fSRS to 30 Gy in 5 fractions has promising efficacy with low incidence of sRN in treatment of CNS metastatic disease. Further investigation is required to determine predictors in patient outcome.


2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 15178-15178
Author(s):  
T. J. Yates ◽  
M. Abouljoud ◽  
A. Lambing ◽  
P. Kuriakose

15178 Background: The increased risk of thromboses is well documented in patients with malignancies, and those undergoing abdominal surgery. Furthermore, patients requiring hepatic resection for underlying malignant disease have been reported to be at increased risk for thrombotic complications. However, guidelines for thromboprophylaxis in this patient population are still under investigation. A cursory review performed at our institution determined the incidence of thrombotic events to be comparable to that reported in the literature. We, therefore, went further to study if there was a difference in the risk of thromboses between those undergoing resection for primary hepatic cancer, versus metastatic disease. Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review of patients undergoing surgical resection for hepatic malignancies. The primary end point was to determine whether there was a difference in the incidence of thrombotic events between primary and secondary malignancies. Results: A total of 99 patients at our institution underwent surgical resection for either primary or secondary hepatic malignancies in the past 5 years. There were 7 patients who developed thrombotic events within three months of their resection. Of these patients, all 7 underwent resection for secondary hepatic malignancies. Based on the nature of this study, and its lack of standardized thromboprophylaxis, statistical analysis was not performed. Conclusions: Patients undergoing surgical resection of hepatic malignancies appear to be at increased risk of thrombotic events, and may require more specific standardization of their thromboprophylaxis. Furthermore, based on our observation it appears those associated with metastatic disease may derive an even greater benefit from this. Future prospective studies will be required to evaluate this difference in thromboses, and to better define the guidelines for thromboprophylaxis. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amber M. Bates ◽  
Ryan J. Brown ◽  
Alexander A. Pieper ◽  
Luke M. Zangl ◽  
Ian Arthur ◽  
...  

Surgical resection or hypo-fractionated radiation therapy (RT) in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) achieves local tumor control, but metastatic relapse remains a challenge. We hypothesized that immunotherapy with anti-CTLA-4 and bempegaldesleukin (BEMPEG; NKTR-214), a CD122-preferential IL2 pathway agonist, after primary tumor RT or resection would reduce metastases in a syngeneic murine NSCLC model. Mice bearing Lewis Lung Carcinoma (LLC) tumors were treated with combinations of BEMPEG, anti-CTLA-4, and primary tumor treatment (surgical resection or RT). Primary tumor size, mouse survival, and metastatic disease at the time of death were assessed. Flow cytometry, qRT-PCR, and cytokine analyses were performed on tumor specimens. All mice treated with RT or surgical resection of primary tumor alone succumbed to metastatic disease, and all mice treated with BEMPEG and/or anti-CTLA-4 succumbed to primary tumor local progression. The combination of primary tumor RT or resection and BEMPEG and anti-CTLA-4 reduced spontaneous metastasis and improved survival without any noted toxicity. Flow cytometric immunoprofiling of primary tumors revealed increased CD8 T and NK cells and decreased T-regulatory cells with the combination of BEMPEG, anti-CTLA-4, and RT compared to RT alone. Increased expression of genes associated with tumor cell immune susceptibility, immune cell recruitment, and cytotoxic T lymphocyte activation were observed in tumors of mice treated with BEMPEG, anti-CTLA-4, and RT. The combination of BEMPEG and anti-CTLA-4 with primary tumor RT or resection enabled effective control of local and metastatic disease in a preclinical murine NSCLC model. This therapeutic combination has important translational potential for patients with early-stage NSCLC and other cancers.


1993 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 449-453 ◽  
Author(s):  
P A Meyers ◽  
G Heller ◽  
J H Healey ◽  
A Huvos ◽  
A Applewhite ◽  
...  

PURPOSE Chemotherapy and surgery have improved the length of survival for patients with osteogenic sarcoma (OS) who present without metastatic disease. We reviewed our experience with patients with OS who presented with clinically detectable metastasis to determine the prognostic factors and the effects of surgery on the primary tumor and on metastatic disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS From 1975 to 1984 we treated 62 patients who had previously untreated OS with metastasis detected at presentation. All of these patients received intensive chemotherapy that included high-dose methotrexate; doxorubicin; and bleomycin, cyclophosphamide, and dactinomycin (BCD). Selected patients also received cisplatin. The intent of surgery was resection of the primary tumor and metastatic disease. RESULTS Survival was extremely poor; only 11% of patients survived, with a median survival of 20 months. Survival was not affected by use of preoperative chemotherapy versus immediate surgery, and did not correlate with serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) level, alkaline phosphatase level, or the site of the primary tumor. Survival did correlate with age, location of metastatic disease, histologic response to preoperative chemotherapy, and completeness of surgical resection of all sites of tumor. Resection of all sites of tumor identified at initial presentation was necessary for survival. CONCLUSION OS that presents with metastatic disease has a very poor prognosis with therapy, although therapy has achieved good results for patients without metastasis detected at diagnosis. Aggressive surgical resection of tumor is necessary for survival. The use of novel therapies at initial presentation is justified with this group of patients.


2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 70-70
Author(s):  
Alyson L. Mahar ◽  
Lucy K. Helyer ◽  
Carol Jane Swallow ◽  
Calvin Law ◽  
Lawrence Frank Paszat ◽  
...  

70 Background: Most gastric cancer patients present with advanced stage disease precluding curative surgical treatment. The utility of surgical and non-surgical options for non-curative, advanced disease is debated and the appropriate treatment strategy unclear. Methods: A multi-disciplinary expert panel of 16 physicians from 6 countries, scored 47 scenarios using the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Methodology. Appropriateness was scored from 1 (highly inappropriate) to 9 (highly appropriate). Median appropriateness scores (AS) from 1-3 were considered inappropriate, 4-6 uncertain, and 7-9, appropriate. Agreement was reached when 11 of 16 panelists scored the statement similarly. If a statement was agreed to be appropriate, it was then given a necessity score (NS) in the same manner. Results: Surgical resection and bypass were agreed to be inappropriate in patients with minor symptoms and visible carcinomatosis, liver metastases or more than one site of metastatic disease for cardia and distal lesions (AS 1.0-3.5). The expert panel disagreed on the role for surgical resection in patients who were cytology positive only (AS 4-6). The role of resection for patients with major symptoms if they had visible carcinomatosis, liver metastases or more than one site of metastatic disease (AS 2-5) was indeterminate. Patients with distal tumours and major symptoms and multiple liver metastases or more than one site of metastatic disease were considered indeterminate for surgical resection (AS 2). Best supportive care was agreed to be appropriate for patients with minor symptoms and multiple liver metastases or more than one site of metastatic disease (AS 8, NS 5-6). Conclusions: The role of surgery in metastatic gastric cancer treatment decision-making is not supported by experts for the majority of scenarios. Continued uncertainty in appropriate and necessary treatment decision-making for advanced patients with a minimal burden metastatic disease exists and underscores the need for randomized controlled trials.


2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 225-225
Author(s):  
Sofia Palacio ◽  
Peter Joel Hosein ◽  
Joe U Levi ◽  
Jaime R. Merchan ◽  
Jorge Monge ◽  
...  

225 Background: Surgical resection is the only potentially curative modality for PDAC. However, even after a successful surgical resection outcomes are poor due to both local and distant disease recurrence. Patients with early recurrence likely derive no benefit from surgery and could be considered for a non-surgical approach as initial therapy. Since the incidence of recurrent/metastatic disease at first post-operative staging scan is not well documented, our aim was to determine this incidence. Methods: This IRB-approved analysis identified all pts diagnosed with resectable PDAC that underwent surgery with intent to cure at the University of Miami/Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center between 2010 and 2012. Patients with imaging before and within 6 months after surgery were included. All post-operative CT scans performed within 3 months after surgery were reviewed for the presence of recurrent and/or metastatic disease. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: Data from105 pts were analyzed. Mean age was 61, 63% were male, 91% had adenocarcinoma, 84% had disease in the head of the pancreas. 11 out of 85 (13%) pts had recurrent/metastatic disease detected on first post-operative CT scan; 64% stage IIB and 73% had positive lymph nodes. 54 out of 105 (51%) had disease progression. 60% had local recurrence, 40% had distant metastasis. The mean time from preoperative CT scan to surgery was 35 days. Patients with early and late recurrence had similar OS from diagnosis (median 27.7 and 27.1 months, respectively) but worse than those with no disease recurrence (median not reached, OS rate 78% at 36 months). Conclusions: The relatively high incidence (13%) of early recurrence in this retrospective cohort suggests that further studies aimed at improving patient selection for surgery are warranted and provides a strong rationale for the use of neoadjuvant therapy to select patients with early disease progression who would not have benefitted from surgery.


2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 256-256
Author(s):  
Brenna Rheinheimer ◽  
Ronald Heimark ◽  
Tun Jie

256 Background: Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs) are among one of the fastest growing cancer diagnoses, yet clinical management for patients with metastatic disease is largely empirically based. Currently, surgical resection remains the only curative option; however, surgical resection of metastatic disease may not be feasible. Preliminary genomic analysis of primary PanNETs revealed a complex mutational landscape with four common oncogenic events; but, critical activation pathways of metastatic lesions have yet to be elucidated. Therefore, pan-genomic analysis of metastatic PanNETs is necessary to understand which genes/pathways are deregulated in PanNET metastases for potential therapeutic exploitation. Methods: We initiated a preliminary genomic sequencing study to evaluate mutations in a set of matched primary and metastatic PanNETs to determine genetic variants involved in metastasis to the liver. De-identified FFPE tumor samples were analyzed from patients who underwent surgical resection without receiving preoperative therapy. DNA was isolated and whole exome sequencing was performed using the Nextera Rapid Capture Exome Kit by Illumina on an Illumina HiSeq 2000/2500. The following criteria were used to define genetic variants: bidirectional, non-synonymous, clean mapping in IGV, ≥ 15X coverage, and an alternate allele frequency of 0.3 ≤ x ≤ 0.7. Results: All metastatic PanNETs were classified as WHO grade G2/G3 based on their KI-67 proliferation index. Each primary PanNET contained an average of 102 genetic variants while liver metastases showed an average of 124 genetic variants. MUFFINN and string analysis revealed that primary PanNETs contained enrichment for mutations involved in the PI3K/Akt and Ras signaling pathways while liver metastases showed enrichment for mutations involved in the MAPK and ErbB signaling pathways. Additionally, two-thirds of liver metastases contained somatic mutations in FGFR3. Conclusions: We have discovered novel pathways that have the potential to regulate pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor metastasis along with an innovative signaling pathway that may sustain metastatic growth and survival as well as exploitation for therapeutic potential.


2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e16752-e16752
Author(s):  
Benjamin Edward Ueberroth ◽  
Alex John Liu ◽  
Rondell P. Graham ◽  
Mohamad Bassam Sonbol ◽  
Thorvardur Ragnar Halfdanarson

e16752 Background: Undifferentiated osteoclast-like giant cell carcinoma of the pancreas is an aggressive malignancy only described by a few case reports in the literature. In this study, we sought to better characterize this entity by examining patients seen at Mayo Clinic. Methods: This study identified patients with osteoclast-like giant cell carcinoma of the pancreas using Mayo Clinic databases (MN, AZ, FL) from the year 2000 to present. Patient demographics, genetic data, and treatment modalities were reviewed. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to evaluate median overall survival (mOS) for the cohort as well as mOS and mPFS for treatment subgroups. Results: 15 patients were identified (9 female, 6 male). Median age at diagnosis was 59 years and mOS for all patients was 11.0 mos (95% CI 6.2-15.7 mos). 3 patients (20%) had metastatic disease at diagnosis with the liver being the most common site (n = 3). Metastatic disease was associated with significantly shorter OS (3.5 vs. 14.1 mos, p = 0.005; HR 7.98 [95% CI 1.43-44.4]) compared to locoregional disease (LRD). 4 patients underwent genetic testing. The most common mutation was CDKN2A (n = 3), followed by TP53 (n = 2) and KRAS (n = 2). 13/15 patients had detailed follow-up information. 6/7 patients undergoing chemotherapy received a gemcitabine-based regimen as first line: with capecitabine (n = 2), with nab-paclitaxel (n = 2), or as monotherapy (n = 2). 1 patient received FOLFIRINOX. In patients with LRD and adequate follow-up (n = 11), 8/11 underwent surgical resection and had longer OS compared to those without resection (17.0 vs. 8.4 mos, p = 0.09). No surgical patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. 5/8 received adjuvant chemotherapy, 2 did not undergo chemotherapy, and 1 was lost to follow-up after surgery. PFS from time of surgery was 15.3mos (95% CI 5.0-25.6mos). 6 patients (40%) were alive at time of analysis; all 6 underwent surgical resection. Conclusions: Osteoclast-like giant cell carcinoma of the pancreas is a rare malignancy with a poor prognosis, even when diagnosed at an early stage. OS for patients of all stages in this study was less than 1 year suggesting prognosis may be even worse than that of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. The optimal therapy remains unknown but most patients received similar chemotherapy as in adenocarcinoma. Patients with LRD amenable to surgical resection experienced a PFS over 1 year from surgery, possibly associated with OS benefit, however overall prognosis is poor. Further study is warranted on a larger scale to better understand disease course and treatment options.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document