scholarly journals Comparison of Intensity Discrimination between Children Using Cochlear Implants and Typically Developing Children

2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 368-372
Author(s):  
Shubha Tak ◽  
◽  
Asha Yathiraj ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Cochlear Implants ◽  
Intensity Discrimination ◽  
Typically Developing ◽  
Typically Developing Children

scholarly journals Compreensão e produção oral de interrogativas-Q em crianças portuguesas surdas com implante coclear

2018 ◽  
pp. 168-189
Author(s):  
Mara Moita ◽  
Maria Lobo
Keyword(s):  
Sign Language ◽  
Cochlear Implants ◽  
Typically Developing ◽  
Linguistic Variables ◽  
Language Therapy ◽  
Typically Developing Children ◽  
Speech And Language Therapy ◽  
Wh Questions ◽  
Therapy Sessions ◽  
Impaired Children

The present study investigates the comprehension and production of Portuguese wh-questions by hearing impaired children with cochlear implants. We investigate whether the asymmetries found in typically developing children are also present in our target group or whether the difficulties are more widespread. In particular, we investigate whether there are asymmetries between subject and (DP/PP) object wh-questions produced by these children, and whether wh-questions with a lexical restriction are more difficult than bare wh-questions. We also consider the importance of extra-linguistic variables, such as age of implantation, hearing age, early attendance of speech and language therapy sessions, and exposure to sign language.

scholarly journals Syntactic abilities among Marathi speaking children with hearing impairment using cochlear implant

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Piyush Sone ◽  
Ratan Jadhav ◽  
Medha Karbhari Adhyaru
Keyword(s):  
Cochlear Implant ◽  
Hearing Impairment ◽  
Cochlear Implants ◽  
Age Groups ◽  
Typically Developing ◽  
Typically Developing Children ◽  
Wh Questions ◽  
Age Range ◽  
Better Than

<p><strong>Background:</strong> Syntax is an important aspect of language. It is very important to study syntax development in the children with hearing impairment (HI). The aim of study was to compare syntactic abilities of Marathi speaking children with hearing impairment using cochlear implant and typical developing children in the age range of 4 to 7 years.<strong></strong></p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ninety typically developing children, 26 language age matched children using cochlear implants were included in this study. They were grouped into three age groups: 4-5, 5-6 and 6-7 years. Syntax test in Marathi which has six subtests in comprehension: wh-questions, negations/yes/no questions, post-positions, plurals, tenses, person, number, gender markers and five subtests in expression: negation/yes/no questions, post-positions, plurals, tenses, person, number, gender markers was administered through a laptop to children in each group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results showed typically developing children performed significantly better than children with hearing impairment using cochlear implant I the age range of 4 to 5 years. Except postposition and PNG markers of comprehensive syntactic abilities all other syntactic abilities were significantly poor in children using cochlear implants. Only expressive syntactic abilities were significantly poor among children using cochlear implants in the age range of 6 to 7 years.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall, the findings of this study showed that that Syntax test in Marathi can identify impairment in the syntactic ability in Marathi speaking children with hearing impairment. Children with hearing impairment using cochlear implants showed poor syntactic abilities.</p>

scholarly journals Beginning to Talk Like an Adult: Increases in Speech-Like Utterances in Young Cochlear Implant Recipients and Typically Developing Children

2013 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 591-603 ◽  
Author(s):  
David J. Ertmer ◽  
Jongmin Jung ◽  
Diana True Kloiber
Keyword(s):  
Cochlear Implant ◽  
Cochlear Implants ◽  
Speech Development ◽  
Typically Developing ◽  
Vocal Development ◽  
Typically Developing Children ◽  
Auditory Deprivation ◽  
Time Points ◽  
Device Use

PurposeSpeech-like utterances containing rapidly combined consonants and vowels eventually dominate the prelinguistic and early word productions of typically developing (TD) toddlers. It seems reasonable to expect a similar phenomenon in young recipients of cochlear implants (CIs). The authors of this study sought to determine the number of months of robust hearing experience needed to achieve a majority of speech-like utterances in both of these groups.MethodSpeech samples were recorded from CI recipients at 3-month intervals during the first 2 years of CI experience, and from TD children at time points between 6 and 24 months of age. Speech-like utterances were operationally defined as those belonging to the basic canonical syllables (BCS) or advanced forms (AF) levels of the Consolidated Stark Assessment of Early Vocal Development—Revised (Ertmer, Young, & Nathani, 2007).ResultsOn average, the CI group achieved a majority of speech-like utterances after 12 months of robust hearing experience and the TD group after 18 months. The CI group produced greater percentages of speech-like utterances at each interval until 24 months, when both groups approximated 80%.ConclusionAuditory deprivation did not limit progress in vocal development as young CI recipients showed more-rapid-than-typical speech development during the first 2 years of device use. Implications for the infraphonological model of speech development are considered.

scholarly journals Comparison of Relative Loudness Judgment in Children using Listening Devices with Typically Developing Children

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shubha Tak ◽  
Asha Yathiraj
Keyword(s):  
Cochlear Implant ◽  
Hearing Impairment ◽  
Cochlear Implants ◽  
Hearing Aids ◽  
Hearing Aid ◽  
Normal Hearing ◽  
Standard Group ◽  
Typically Developing ◽  
Typically Developing Children ◽  
Loudness Judgment

Abstract Introduction Loudness perception is considered important for the perception of emotions, relative distance and stress patterns. However, certain digital hearing devices worn by those with hearing impairment may affect their loudness perception. This could happen in devices that have compression circuits to make loud sounds soft and soft sounds loud. These devices could hamper children from gaining knowledge about loudness of acoustical signals. Objective To compare relative loudness judgment of children using listening devices with age-matched typically developing children. Methods The relative loudness judgment of sounds created by day-to-day objects were evaluated on 60 children (20 normal-hearing, 20 hearing aid users, & 20 cochlear implant users), utilizing a standard group comparison design. Using a two-alternate forced-choice technique, the children were required to select picturized sound sources that were louder. Results The majority of the participants obtained good scores and poorer scores were mainly obtained by children using cochlear implants. The cochlear implant users obtained significantly lower scores than the normal-hearing participants. However, the scores were not significantly different between the normal-hearing children and the hearing aid users as well as between the two groups with hearing impairment. Conclusion Thus, despite loudness being altered by listening devices, children using non-linear hearing aids or cochlear implants are able to develop relative loudness judgment for acoustic stimuli. However, loudness growth for electrical stimuli needs to be studied.

Age Norms for Auditory-Perceptual Neurophonetic Parameters: A Prerequisite for the Assessment of Childhood Dysarthria

2020 ◽  
Vol 63 (4) ◽  
pp. 1071-1082
Author(s):  
Theresa Schölderle ◽  
Elisabet Haas ◽  
Wolfram Ziegler
Keyword(s):  
Assessment Tool ◽  
Developmental Trajectories ◽  
Voice Quality ◽  
Typically Developing ◽  
Typically Developing Children ◽  
Age Norms ◽  
Elementary School Age ◽  
Speech Characteristics ◽  
Substantial Progress ◽  
Computer Based

Purpose The aim of this study was to collect auditory-perceptual data on established symptom categories of dysarthria from typically developing children between 3 and 9 years of age, for the purpose of creating age norms for dysarthria assessment. Method One hundred forty-four typically developing children (3;0–9;11 [years;months], 72 girls and 72 boys) participated. We used a computer-based game specifically designed for this study to elicit sentence repetitions and spontaneous speech samples. Speech recordings were analyzed using the auditory-perceptual criteria of the Bogenhausen Dysarthria Scales, a standardized German assessment tool for dysarthria in adults. The Bogenhausen Dysarthria Scales (scales and features) cover clinically relevant dimensions of speech and allow for an evaluation of well-established symptom categories of dysarthria. Results The typically developing children exhibited a number of speech characteristics overlapping with established symptom categories of dysarthria (e.g., breathy voice, frequent inspirations, reduced articulatory precision, decreased articulation rate). Substantial progress was observed between 3 and 9 years of age, but with different developmental trajectories across different dimensions. In several areas (e.g., respiration, voice quality), 9-year-olds still presented with salient developmental speech characteristics, while in other dimensions (e.g., prosodic modulation), features typically associated with dysarthria occurred only exceptionally, even in the 3-year-olds. Conclusions The acquisition of speech motor functions is a prolonged process not yet completed with 9 years. Various developmental influences (e.g., anatomic–physiological changes) shape children's speech specifically. Our findings are a first step toward establishing auditory-perceptual norms for dysarthria in children of kindergarten and elementary school age. Supplemental Material https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.12133380

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document