scholarly journals A study of the effects of chiropractic therapy on the diameter of the spinal canal of patients with low back pain and radiculopathy

1996 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Bradley Stuart Beira
Keyword(s):  
Low Back Pain ◽  
Back Pain ◽  
Lumbar Spine ◽  
Intervertebral Disc ◽  
Spinal Canal ◽  
Low Back ◽  
Lumbar Intervertebral Disc ◽  
Chiropractic Therapy

Focus during this investigation was directed towards determining alterations in the size of the lumbar intervertebral disc in patients symptomatic with low back pain and sciatic distribution pain, in response to chiropractic management of this condition. The efficacy of chiropractic management for low back pain with associated radiculopathy has been examined. Flexion distraction technique and side posture rotatory adjustment technique of the lumbar spine have been used during this trial.

scholarly journals Discography interpretation and techniques in the lumbar spine

2002 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frank J. Tomecek ◽  
C. Scott Anthony ◽  
Chris Boxell ◽  
Jennifer Warren
Keyword(s):  
Low Back Pain ◽  
Back Pain ◽  
Lumbar Spine ◽  
Intervertebral Disc ◽  
Nucleus Pulposus ◽  
Diagnostic Test ◽  
Diagnostic Tool ◽  
Radiographic Evaluation ◽  
Low Back

The authors provide an indepth analysis of discography, a provocative diagnostic tool to determine the origin of low-back pain. Injecting the intervertebral disc with radiopaque dye provides physicians with several useful pieces of information. First, the modality provides radiographic evaluation of the integrity of the nucleus pulposus and anular rings to determine tears or other lesions that could be creating low-back pain. Second, and very important, is its measure of disc nociception. A normal disc should not cause pain when injected; however, a disc that is physiologically compromised can mimic the pain previously experienced by a patient. The authors review the indications, technique, and interpretation of discography to allow a better understanding of when to use this diagnostic test and what to do with the results.

Does elite swimming accelerate lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration and increase low back pain? A cross-sectional comparison

2016 ◽  
Vol 25 (9) ◽  
pp. 2849-2855 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steffen Folkvardsen ◽  
Erland Magnussen ◽  
Jaro Karppinen ◽  
Juha Auvinen ◽  
Rasmus Hertzum Larsen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Low Back Pain ◽  
Back Pain ◽  
Intervertebral Disc ◽  
Disc Degeneration ◽  
Intervertebral Disc Degeneration ◽  
Low Back ◽  
Lumbar Intervertebral Disc ◽  
Cross Sectional

scholarly journals Lumbago is different from prolapse of lumbar intervertebral disc

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Wei Zhou ◽  
Yanbo Qiu ◽  
Shaoqiu Zhou ◽  
Wei Zhao
Keyword(s):  
Low Back Pain ◽  
Back Pain ◽  
Intervertebral Disc ◽  
Lumbar Disc ◽  
Posterior Longitudinal Ligament ◽  
Low Back ◽  
Lumbar Intervertebral Disc ◽  
Disc Protrusion ◽  
Medical Reform ◽  
System Disease

<p>There are many errors found in the content of textbook in National Higher Education.For example:One of the errors found in the“Surgery”version no 418 is about movement system disease section.In chapter 677 Section III,the content misinterpretation of the cause of low back pain is the intervertebral disc protrusion that stimulate the outer annulus and the posterior longitudinal ligament in the sinus nerve fibers.For the past twenty years,feedbacks had been reflected repeatedly to the involved party but no one had admitted the contents of the textbook are wrong.The errors had brought great economy loss,physical and mental pain to patients.Every year,the country has to spend billions of dollars in the waste of medical reform reimbursement.This article is aimed to discuss about low back pain is not due to lumbar disc herniation.</p>

scholarly journals Transforaminal Epidural Injection of Dexamethasone vs Methylprednisolone in Reducing Low Back Pain and Disability in Prolapsed Lumbar Intervertebral Disc in Manipur, India: A RCT

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kanti Rajkumari ◽  
Akoijam Joy Singh ◽  
Longjam Nilachandra Singh ◽  
Margaret Chabungbam ◽  
C Sreejith ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Low Back Pain ◽  
Back Pain ◽  
Intervertebral Disc ◽  
Steroid Injection ◽  
Epidural Injection ◽  
P Value ◽  
Low Back ◽  
Lumbar Intervertebral Disc ◽  
Transforaminal Epidural Injection ◽  
Epidural Steroid

Introduction: Treatment for Low Back Pain (LBP) due to Prolapsed Intervertebral Disc (PIVD) includes conservative management, Epidural Steroid Injection (ESI), and surgery. Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injection (TFESI) is a more recently described approach. All corticosteroid preparations used for TFESI are particulate except dexamethasone and betamethasone sodium phosphate. But while comparing methylprednisolone with dexamethasone, the latter has more potent anti-inflammatory action with least likelihood of causing embolic events and is also less expensive. Aim: To compare the efficacy of transforaminal epidural injection of dexamethasone and methylprednisolone in reducing LBP and disability in prolapsed lumbar intervertebral disc amongst the indigenous population of Manipur, India. Materials and Methods: This was a randomised controlled study on 80 patients with PIVD attending Outpatient Department (OPD) at physical medicine and rehabilitation was conducted from September 2016 to August 2018. A single dose of lumbar TFESI with dexamethasone in the study group and methylprednisolone in the control were given under C-arm guidance. The outcome variables Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) for function were measured at one week, one month and six months. Statistical tests like t-test, Chi-square test were used for intra group and inter group analysis. Results: In the total sample of 80 patients, 40 (15 males and 25 females, mean age: 38.28±8.55 years) were categorised as Dexamethasone patients and 40 (17 males and 23 females; mean age: 39.28±7.80 years) as methylprednisolone patients, there were significant improvement in mean score of VAS and ODI in both the groups (p-value <0.05). At six months, both treatment groups maintained initial observed improvements, with no significant differences between groups on the VAS {95% Confidence Interval (CI), -0.02 to 0.4; p-value=0.07} and ODI (95% CI,-0.21 to 3.43; p-value=0.08). Conclusion: Non-particulate steroid dexamethasone was similar in efficacy to the particulate steroid methylprednisolone in lumbar TFESI. However, in view of the greater safety profile of dexamethasone, it is suggested that dexamethasone may be used as the preferred agent in lumbar TFESI.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document