scholarly journals Correlating R&D Expenditure and Scholarly Publication Output Using K-Means Clustering

2017 ◽  
Vol 05 (01) ◽  
pp. 01-07 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kamath R.S ◽  
Kamat R.K ◽  
Pujar S.M
Keyword(s):  
Publication Output ◽  
Scholarly Publication

Mapping the Research Output of University of Kashmir

2015 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Asifa Jan ◽  
Suhail Ahmed ◽  
Nahida Tun Nisa ◽  
Asiya Ahmed
Keyword(s):  
Biological Sciences ◽  
Research Output ◽  
Publication Output ◽  
Regional Research Laboratory ◽  
Medical Sciences ◽  
Joint Research ◽  
Document Type ◽  
H Index ◽  
Search Feature ◽  
Sciverse Scopus

The study maps the research output from University of Kashmir, one of the premier higher education institutes of Jammu&Kashmir state, India. Elseviers SciVerse Scopus one of the leading indexing abstracting services was queried for a period of 1963- February 2015 using the affiliation search feature for University of Kashmir. The works of the authors affiliated with University of Kashmir have been analyzed. Statistical analysis of the retrieved data was performed. The publication output from University of Kashmir has shown a promising growth expect for some years in 1990s which can be attributed to the political instability in the state. The highest contributing authors are from Science disciplines with authors from Chemistry, Botany, Electronics, Biochemistry, and Centre of Research for Development departments having a higher rate of h-Index. Majority of papers are published in Indian sources followed by the sources from US, Germany and China. Majority of the authors are affiliated with University of Kashmir followed by Indian Institute of Integrative Medicine (Earlier Regional Research Laboratory, Sanat Nagar), Sher-i-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences (SKIMS) and Aligarh Muslim University. Articles have remained a prime document type for publishing by the authors from University of Kashmir followed by conference proceedings and review articles. Agricultural and Biological Sciences outscore other disciplines followed by Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology and Medicine. Future emphasis on joint research, international collaboration, and publishing in indexed journals is needed.

scholarly journals Is There a Motherhood Penalty in Academia? The Gendered Effect of Children on Academic Publications in German Sociology

2019 ◽  
Vol 36 (3) ◽  
pp. 442-459 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark Lutter ◽  
Martin Schröder
Keyword(s):  
Publication Output ◽  
Scientific Career ◽  
Double Burden ◽  
Academic Achievements ◽  
Motherhood Penalty ◽  
Academic Publications ◽  
Curriculum Vitae ◽  
Successful Women ◽  
German Sociology ◽  
Number Of Publications

Abstract Based on data that tracks curriculum vitae (CV) and publication records as well as survey information from sociologists in German academia, we examine the effects of parenthood on the publication output of male and female academics that were present in German universities or research institutes in the year 2013. Results indicate that having children leads to a significant decline in the number of publications by women on average, while not affecting the number of publications by men. However, the gendered effect of children on productivity hardly mitigates differences in publication output between men and women, as women still publish about 20 per cent less than men after controlling for the adverse effects of children on productivity. The gendered effect of childbearing depends partly on prior levels of women’s academic achievements, suggesting a mechanism of performance-driven self-selection. Lower-performing women tend to suffer a stronger motherhood penalty than better performing women, while the publication output of successful women (who have been granted academic awards) is not reduced through childbirth. The results indicate that women are better at managing the ‘double burden’ of kids and career if external, award-giving committees have bestowed prestige upon them or indicated their potential for a scientific career.

Exposing the Textbook Bias: The Need for Professional credit

1983 ◽  
Vol 37 ◽  
pp. 2-2
Author(s):  
Charles W. Dunn
Keyword(s):  
Political Science ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Journal Article ◽  
Science Department ◽  
Faculty Performance ◽  
Scholarly Publication ◽  
Scholarly Publications ◽  
Political Science Department ◽  
Scholarly Contribution ◽  
Textbook Bias

Why is authorship of a textbook generally considered less of a scholarly contribution than authorship of a “scholarly” publication, such as a journal article or a university press book?Certainly both are needed, but is it right for a political science department to reward faculty who author “scholarly” publications more than those who author textbooks?Whether stipulated in the criteria for departmental evaluation of faculty performance or in other less overt ways, the bias is prevalent throughout our discipline.This essay states five reasons why the bias should not exist: 1) ignorance of impact, 2) ignorance of values, 3) ignorance of the review process, 4) ignorance of purpose, and 5) ignorance of time and Scope.

scholarly journals Thematic research clusters in very old populations (≥ 80 years): a bibliometric approach

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Gregorio Gonzalez-Alcaide ◽  
Sergio Palacios-Fernandez ◽  
Jose-Manuel Ramos-Rincon
Keyword(s):  
Elderly People ◽  
Bacterial Infections ◽  
Healthy Aging ◽  
Population Aging ◽  
Publication Output ◽  
Geographic Region ◽  
Geriatric Syndromes ◽  
Research Attention ◽  
Very Old ◽  
Subject Areas

Abstract Background Population aging will be one of humanity’s major challenges in the decades to come. In addition to focusing on the pathologies causing the greatest mortality and morbidity in this population, such as dementia, health research in elderly people must consider a myriad of other interlinked factors, such as geriatric syndromes, social aspects, and factors related to preserving quality of life and promoting healthy aging. This study aims to identify the main subject areas attracting research attention with regard to very old (≥ 80 years) populations. Methods Documents assigned with the medical subject heading “Aged, 80 and over” were retrieved from MEDLINE and the Web of Science. This dataset was used to determine publication output by disease, geographic region, country, and discipline. A co-word analysis was undertaken to identify thematic research clusters. Results Since the mid-2000s, there has been a boom in scientific output focusing specifically on very old populations, especially in Europe (43.7% of the documents) but also in North America (30.5%) and Asia (26%); other regions made only nominal contributions (0.5 to 4.4%). The USA produced the most research, while the most growth over the study period occurred in Japan, Spain, and China. Four broad thematic clusters were identified: a) geriatric diseases, health services for the aged, and social and psychological issues of aging; b) cardiovascular diseases; c) neoplasms, and d) bacterial infections & anti-bacterial agents. Conclusions Scientific research in very old populations covers a wide variety of interrelated topics. In quantitative terms, the top subject areas have to do with cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases (including aortic valve stenosis and stroke), dementia, and neoplasms. However, other degenerative pathologies, geriatric syndromes, and different social and psychosocial aspects also attract considerable interest. It is necessary to promote more equal participation in global research on pathologies and topics related to very elderly populations, as the highest rates of population aging and the largest numbers of elderly people in the next decades will be in low- and middle-income countries.

The Study of Chinese Political Culture

1966 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 503-524 ◽  
Author(s):  
John W. Lewis
Keyword(s):  
Political Culture ◽  
Cross Section ◽  
Scholarly Publication ◽  
Communist China ◽  
The Individual ◽  
Chinese Political Culture

These seven recent works typify a cross section of scholarly publication on the Chinese People's Republic, its history, present operation, and prospects. Taken together, they provide the basis for some remarks on the study of Chinese “political culture.” Rather than attempt a full review of the individual works, this brief article will examine some of their assumptions and indirectly comment on the literature they represent. Each book reflects a prodigious scholarly effort and has received in various other journals a complete appraisal of its intellectual value. In general it may be fairly said that these volumes do not constitute significant breakthroughs of knowledge. They do, however, bring together and analyze important bodies of data on Communist China.

Publication output in telemedicine in Spain

2005 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-28 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francisco Gonzalez ◽  
Adrian F Castro
Keyword(s):  
Publication Output

Genetic Diversity Research Publication Output in India: A Scientometric Analysis

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 98-102
Author(s):  
Jyothi G. Nair ◽  
S. Raja
Keyword(s):  
Genetic Diversity ◽  
Publication Output ◽  
Scientometric Analysis ◽  
Research Publication ◽  
Citation Pattern ◽  
Authorship Pattern ◽  
Collaboration Pattern ◽  
Single Authorship ◽  
Institutional Status ◽  
Diversity Research

This paper attempts a scientometric analysis of literature in the field of genetic diversity in India over 5 years (2013-2017). A total of 1417 records and 5960 unique authors are identified. The study characterizes growth output, Authorship pattern, Collaboration pattern, Citation pattern, institutional status etc. Many of the publications have received worldwide attention of various researchers, policymakers, and planners. The number of papers was maximum in the year 2016. Average publication per year is 283. Multi-authored papers dominated over single authorship. The study was analysed by using HistCite software.

scholarly journals Evolution of the Scientific Literature on Input–Output Analysis: A Bibliometric Analysis of 1990–2017

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (9) ◽  
pp. 3135 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yulei Xie ◽  
Ling Ji ◽  
Beibei Zhang ◽  
Gordon Huang
Keyword(s):  
Bibliometric Analysis ◽  
Citation Index ◽  
Publication Output ◽  
The United States ◽  
Input Output ◽  
Output Analysis ◽  
Related Field ◽  
Input Output Analysis ◽  
Research Institution ◽  
Productive Research

This study attempts to characterize the literature related to input–output analysis between 1990–2017 through bibliometric analysis technology based on the Science Citation Index and Social Sciences Citation Index databases. By means of bibliometric tools, this paper provides deep insights on the patterns of these articles, the most influential works and authors, and the emerging research topics. The results imply that China and the United States (USA) are the leading countries in terms of publication output. The Chinese Academy of Sciences is the most productive research institution, followed by Beijing Normal University and the University of Sydney. The Journal of Cleaner Production, Ecological Economics, and Energy Policy are the top mainstream journals in the input–output analysis-related field. Based on network analysis, this paper also discovers the hidden collaboration patterns and interrelations of countries, institutions, and authors. The bibliographic coupling and keywords concurrence networks are adopted to illustrate the input–output analysis evolution over time, and identify the current key research hotspots. The obtained results will help scientific researchers better understand the research status and frontier trends in this field, permit researchers to know the current research interests in the input–output analysis field, and provide useful information for further investigation and publication strategies.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document