scholarly journals Hybrid Decision Tree and Naïve Bayes Classifier for Predicting Study Period and Predicate of Student’s Graduation

2018 ◽  
Vol 180 (49) ◽  
pp. 28-34
Author(s):  
Nurul Renaningtias ◽  
Jatmiko Endro ◽  
Rahmat Gernowo
Keyword(s):  
Decision Tree ◽  
Naive Bayes ◽  
Naïve Bayes ◽  
Naive Bayes Classifier ◽  
Bayes Classifier ◽  
Naïve Bayes Classifier

scholarly journals COMPARISON OF NAIVE BAYES ALGORITHM AND C.45 ALGORITHM IN CLASSIFICATION OF POOR COMMUNITIES RECEIVING NON CASH FOOD ASSISTANCE IN WANASARI VILLAGE KARAWANG REGENCY

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-42
Author(s):  
Yuris Alkhalifi ◽  
Ainun Zumarniansyah ◽  
Rian Ardianto ◽  
Nila Hardi ◽  
Annisa Elfina Augustia
Keyword(s):  
Decision Tree ◽  
Naive Bayes ◽  
Confusion Matrix ◽  
Total Sample ◽  
Naïve Bayes ◽  
Food Assistance ◽  
Training Data ◽  
Naive Bayes Classifier ◽  
Bayes Classifier ◽  
Naïve Bayes Classifier

Non-Cash Food Assistance or Bantuan Pangan Non-Tunai (BPNT) is food assistance from the government given to the Beneficiary Family (KPM) every month through an electronic account mechanism that is used only to buy food at the Electronic Shop Mutual Assistance Joint Business Group Hope Family Program (e-Warong KUBE PKH ) or food traders working with Bank Himbara. In its distribution, BPNT still has problems that occur that are experienced by the village apparatus especially the apparatus of Desa Wanasari on making decisions, which ones are worthy of receiving (poor) and not worthy of receiving (not poor). So one way that helps in making decisions can be done through the concept of data mining. In this study, a comparison of 2 algorithms will be carried out namely Naive Bayes Classifier and Decision Tree C.45. The total sample used is as much as 200 head of household data which will then be divided into 2 parts into validation techniques is 90% training data and 10% test data of the total sample used then the proposed model is made in the RapidMiner application and then evaluated using the Confusion Matrix table to find out the highest level of accuracy from 2 of these methods. The results in this classification indicate that the level of accuracy in the Naive Bayes Classifier method is 98.89% and the accuracy level in the Decision Tree C.45 method is 95.00%. Then the conclusion that in this study the algorithm with the highest level of accuracy is the Naive Bayes Classifier algorithm method with a difference in the accuracy rate of 3.89%.

scholarly journals PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF CLASSIFICATION ALGORITHM ON DIABETES HEALTHCARE DATASET

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (8) ◽  
pp. 260-266
Author(s):  
Subhankar Manna ◽  
Malathi G.
Keyword(s):  
Decision Tree ◽  
Metabolic Diseases ◽  
Naive Bayes ◽  
Naïve Bayes ◽  
Classification Algorithm ◽  
Naive Bayes Classifier ◽  
Bayes Classifier ◽  
Naïve Bayes Classifier ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Id3 Algorithm

Healthcare industry collects huge amount of unclassified data every day.  For an effective diagnosis and decision making, we need to discover hidden data patterns. An instance of such dataset is associated with a group of metabolic diseases that vary greatly in their range of attributes. The objective of this paper is to classify the diabetic dataset using classification techniques like Naive Bayes, ID3 and k means classification. The secondary objective is to study the performance of various classification algorithms used in this work. We propose to implement the classification algorithm using R package. This work used the dataset that is imported from the UCI Machine Learning Repository, Diabetes 130-US hospitals for years 1999-2008 Data Set. Motivation/Background: Naïve Bayes is a probabilistic classifier based on Bayes theorem. It provides useful perception for understanding many algorithms. In this paper when Bayesian algorithm applied on diabetes dataset, it shows high accuracy. Is assumes variables are independent of each other. In this paper, we construct a decision tree from diabetes dataset in which it selects attributes at each other node of the tree like graph and model, each branch represents an outcome of the test, and each node hold a class attribute. This technique separates observation into branches to construct tree. In this technique tree is split in a recursive way called recursive partitioning. Decision tree is widely used in various areas because it is good enough for dataset distribution. For example, by using ID3 (Decision tree) algorithm we get a result like they are belong to diabetes or not. Method: We will use Naïve Bayes for probabilistic classification and ID3 for decision tree.  Results: The dataset is related to Diabetes dataset. There are 18 columns like – Races, Gender, Take_metformin, Take_repaglinide, Insulin, Body_mass_index, Self_reported_health etc. and 623 rows. Naive Bayes Classifier algorithm will be used for getting the probability of having diabetes or not. Here Diabetes is the class for Diabetes data set. There are two conditions “Yes” and “No” and have some personal information about the patient like - Races, Gender, Take_metformin, Take_repaglinide, Insulin, Body_mass_index, Self_reported_health etc. We will see the probability that for “Yes” what unit of probability and for “No” what unit of probability which is given bellow. For Example: Gender – Female have 0.4964 for “No” and 0.5581 for “Yes” and for Male 0.5035 is for “No” and 0.4418 for “Yes”. Conclusions: In this paper two algorithms had been implemented Naive Bayes Classifier algorithm and ID3 algorithm. From Naive Bayes Classifier algorithm, the probability of having diabetes has been predicted and from ID3 algorithm a decision tree has been generated.

scholarly journals NAIVE BAYES CLASSIFIER, DECISION TREE AND ADABOOST ENSEMBLE ALGORITHM – ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neli Kalcheva ◽  
◽  
Maya Todorova ◽  
Ginka Marinova ◽  
◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Decision Tree ◽  
Naive Bayes ◽  
Naïve Bayes ◽  
Universal Method ◽  
Naive Bayes Classifier ◽  
Bayes Classifier ◽  
Naïve Bayes Classifier ◽  
Advantages And Disadvantages ◽  
Ensemble Algorithm

The purpose of the publication is to analyse popular classification algorithms in machine learning. The following classifiers were studied: Naive Bayes Classifier, Decision Tree and AdaBoost Ensemble Algorithm. Their advantages and disadvantages are discussed. Research shows that there is no comprehensive universal method or algorithm for classification in machine learning. Each method or algorithm works well depending on the specifics of the task and the data used.

scholarly journals Penerapan Na ̈ıve Bayes Classifier, K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN) dan Decision Tree untuk Menganalisis Sentimen pada Interaksi Netizen danPemeritah

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 139-150
Author(s):  
M. Khairul Anam ◽  
Bunga Nanti Pikir ◽  
Muhammad Bambang Firdaus
Keyword(s):  
Data Mining ◽  
Decision Tree ◽  
Nearest Neighbor ◽  
Naive Bayes ◽  
Naïve Bayes ◽  
Naive Bayes Classifier ◽  
Bayes Classifier ◽  
K Nearest Neighbor ◽  
Naïve Bayes Classifier ◽  
Command Center

Pemerintah Pekanbaru saat ini sudah menerapkan teknologi dalam sistem pemerintahan, penerapannya saat ini masih mendapat keluhan dari masyarakat seperti layanan publik command center yang hanya sebagian masyarakat mengetahuinya dan penerapan cctv yang ada di Alat Pemberi Isyarat Lalu Lintas (APILL) yang belum berfungsi dengan baik. Penerapan teknologi lainnya oleh Pemerintah Pekanbaru dapat kita lihat dari keberadaan portal-portal web situs resmi Pemerintah. Sedangkan untuk melihat beragam komentar netizen dari twitter. Twitter menjadi tempat untuk mendapatkan data yang diungkapkan masyarakat melalui tweets yang diposting ke timeline. Analisa sentimen dilakukan untuk melihat pendapat atau kecenderungan opini netizen terhadap pemerintah Pekanbaru yang mengandung sentimen positif, negatif, dan netral. Data yang digunakan adalah tweet dengan jumlah dataset sebanyak 150 tweets. Data tersebut kemudian di analisa agar menjadi informasi. Analisa dilakukan menggunakan metode data mining yaitu Naïve Bayes Classifier, K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN), dan Decision tree. Penggunaan ketiga pendekatan ini berupaya untuk mengkategorikan hasil komentar netizen terkait penggunaan teknologi yang telah melalui proses analisis sentimen dan membandingkan keakuratan ketiga cara tersebut. Hasil akurasi yang didapatkan cukup beragam yaitu dari metode Naïve Bayes akurasi 100%, metode KKN akurasi 98,25%, dan metode decision tree akurasi 62,28%.

scholarly journals Sentiment Analysis About Indonesian Lawyers Club Television Program Using K-Nearest Neighbor, Naïve Bayes Classifier, And Decision Tree

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 50-56
Author(s):  
Nico Nathanael Wilim ◽  
Raymond Sunardi Oetama
Keyword(s):  
Decision Tree ◽  
Sentiment Analysis ◽  
Nearest Neighbor ◽  
Naive Bayes ◽  
Naïve Bayes ◽  
Naive Bayes Classifier ◽  
Bayes Classifier ◽  
K Nearest Neighbor ◽  
Naïve Bayes Classifier ◽  
Talk Show

Indonesia Lawyers Club (ILC) is a talk show on TVOne that discusses topics around public phenomena, legal issues, crime, and other similar topics. In 2018, ILC won the Panasonic Gobel Awards as the best news talk show program. But in 2019, ILC failed to win the award which was won by Mata Najwa which featured a talk show event that appeared on Trans7. As one of the television shows that has won awards, ILC has pros and cons for its shows from the public. This study applies a sentiment analysis approach to examine public opinion on Twitter about Mata Najwa and ILC in 2018 and 2019. This study applies K-Nearest Neighbor, Naïve Bayes Classifier, and Decision Tree classification algorithm to validate the result. The contribution of this study is to show that public opinion on Twitter can be examined to figure out community sentiment on a tv talk show as well as to confirm the Award winner of tv Talkshow.   Index Terms—datamining; Decision Tree; K-NN; Naïve Bayes Classifier; sentiment analysis

scholarly journals DATA MINING DENGAN 2 (DUA) MODEL KLASIFIKASI UNTUK PREDIKSI KINERJA MAHASISWA

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 128-131
Author(s):  
Eka Sabna
Keyword(s):  
Data Mining ◽  
Decision Tree ◽  
Naive Bayes ◽  
Naïve Bayes ◽  
Naive Bayes Classifier ◽  
Bayes Classifier ◽  
Naïve Bayes Classifier

Berlimpahnya data mahasiswa pada perguruan tinggi dapat digunakan secara maksimal sesuai dengan kebutuhan dan mampu diolah menjadi informasi yang bermanfaat sehingga dapat mengetahui hubungan antara atribut data yang di dalamnya dapat dianalisis dan diharapkan memiliki keluaran berupa kinerja mahasiswa yang berhubungan Hasil Belajar (IPK). Metode yang digunakan mengunakan metode CRISP-DM yang terdiri dari 6 tahapan. Ada 2 (dua) metode klasifikasi yang digunakan yaitu Naïve Bayes Classifier dan Decision Tree Algoritma C4.5 untuk dilakukan perbandingan algoritma mana yang lebih baik untuk memprediksi kinerja mahasiswa. Hasil dari implementasi data mining dengan menggunakan software Rapidminer, dilakukan terhadap dua model algoritma klasifikasi yaitu C4.5 dan NBC kemudian memasukan dataset sebagai bahan uji untuk kedua model tersebut yang di dalamnya terdapat data latih dan data uji. Berdasarkan nilai akurasi terbaik pada model algoritma Naive Bayes Classifier (NBC) adalah 80% sedangkan  berdasarkan nilai akurasi terbaik  pada model algoritma C4.5 adalah 60 %. Keywords: C4.5, NBC, IPK, kinerja, mahasiswa

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document