scholarly journals Higher risk of incomplete mesorectal excision and positive circumferential margin in low rectal cancer regardless of surgical technique

2014 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
pp. 569-577
Author(s):  
Alexander Ferko ◽  
Julius Orhalmi ◽  
Tomas Dusek ◽  
Milan Chobola ◽  
Eva Hovorkova ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Surgical Technique ◽  
Low Rectal Cancer ◽  
Circumferential Margin ◽  
Mesorectal Excision

Circumferential margin involvement after total mesorectal excision for mid or low rectal cancer: are all R1 resections equal?

2017 ◽  
Vol 19 (11) ◽  
pp. O377-O385 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Beaufrère ◽  
N. Guedj ◽  
L. Maggiori ◽  
A. Patroni ◽  
P. Bedossa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Total Mesorectal Excision ◽  
Low Rectal Cancer ◽  
Circumferential Margin ◽  
Mesorectal Excision ◽  
Margin Involvement

OUTCOME OF SPHINCTER PRESERVING RECTAL RESECTION FOR LOW RECTAL CANCER

2017 ◽  
pp. 36-40
Author(s):  
Vinh Quy Truong ◽  
Anh Vu Pham ◽  
Quang Thuu Le
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Functional Outcomes ◽  
Low Anterior Resection ◽  
Rectal Resection ◽  
Anal Verge ◽  
Low Rectal Cancer ◽  
Central Hospital ◽  
Mesorectal Excision ◽  
Pull Through ◽  
Stage T1

Purpose: To evaluate the functional outcome of sphincter-preserving rectal resection for low rectal cancer. Materials and Methods: From April 2009 to January 2016, there are 52 patients who underwent sphincter-preserving rectal resection with total mesorectal excision with low rectal cancer (<6cm from the anal verge) at Hue Central Hospital, Hue, Vietnam. Results: the average age 62.7 ± 12.8, the distance of tumor from anal verge include four group (≤ 3cm 1.9%; 3 to ≤ 4cm 17.3%; 4 to ≤ 5cm 34.6%; > 5 cm). T stage T1/ T2/T3: 1.9%/28.8%/69.2%. The following time is 33.8 ± 18.9 month. Overall recurrence was 13/18(27.1%), local recurrence was 5 (10.4%). Total survival was 40.5 ± 2.9 month. Technique: intersphincteric preservation 14 (26.9%), low anterior resection 17 (32.7%) and pull-through procedure 21 (40.4%). The distance of anatomosis from anal verge: from 1 to ≤ 2 cm:14 (26.9%); from 2 to ≤ 3cm: 21 (40.4%); from 3 to ≤ 4 cm: 17 (32.7%). Bowels movement of 3 month: 4.7 ± 3.2 and 12th month: 2.7 ± 1.6 (p< 0.01). Conclusions: Sphincterpreserving rectal resection using may provide a good continence and oncologic safety. The patients are acceptable with the results of functional outcomes. Key words: Low rectal cancer, sphincter-preserving

Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision for low rectal cancer ‐ A step by step approach

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Naveena AN Kumar ◽  
Nawaz Usman ◽  
Keshava Rajan ◽  
Preethi S Shetty ◽  
Vilas HV Crithic ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Total Mesorectal Excision ◽  
Low Rectal Cancer ◽  
Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision ◽  
Mesorectal Excision

scholarly journals Survival analysis of local excision vs total mesorectal excision for middle and low rectal cancer in pT1/pT2 stage and intermediate pathological risk

2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
I-Li Lai ◽  
Jeng-Fu You ◽  
Yih-Jong Chern ◽  
Wen-Sy Tsai ◽  
Jy-Ming Chiang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Therapy ◽  
Total Mesorectal Excision ◽  
Local Excision ◽  
Therapy Group ◽  
Low Rectal Cancer ◽  
Survival Outcomes ◽  
Mesorectal Excision ◽  
Alternative Treatment Option ◽  
Late Morbidity

Abstract Background Local excision (LE) is a feasible treatment approach for rectal cancers in stage pT1 and presents low pathological risk, whereas total mesorectal excision (TME) is a reasonable treatment for more advanced cancers. On the basis of the pathology findings, surgeons may suggest TME for patients receiving LE. This study compared the survival outcomes between LE with/without chemoradiation and TME in mid and low rectal cancer patients in stage pT1/pT2, with highly selective intermediate pathological risk. Methods This retrospective study included 134 patients who received TME and 39 patients who underwent LE for the treatment of intermediate risk (pT1 with poor differentiation, lymphovascular invasion, perineural invasion, relatively large tumor, or small-sized pT2 tumor) rectal cancer between 1998 and 2016. Results Overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and cumulative recurrence rate (CRR) were similar between the LE (3-year DFS 92%) and TME (3-year DFS 91%) groups. Following subgrouping into an LE with adjuvant therapy group and a TME without adjuvant therapy group, the compared survival outcomes (OS, DFS, and CRR) were found not to be statistically different. The temporary and permanent ostomy rates were higher in the TME group than in the LE group (p < 0.001). Rates of early and late morbidity following surgery were higher in the TME group (p = 0.005), and LE had similar survival compared with TME. Conclusion For patients who had mid and low rectal cancer in stage pT1/pT2 and intermediate pathological risk, LE with chemoradiation presents an alternative treatment option for selected patients.

scholarly journals Glove single-port laparoscopy-assisted transanal total mesorectal excision for low rectal cancer: a preliminary report

2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Wanglin Li ◽  
Boye Dong ◽  
Baifu Peng ◽  
Jiabao Lu ◽  
Zixin Wu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Total Mesorectal Excision ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Single Port ◽  
Low Rectal Cancer ◽  
Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision ◽  
Mesorectal Excision ◽  
Single Port Laparoscopy ◽  
The Mean

Abstract Purpose Glove single-port laparoscopy-assisted transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) has been successfully carried out in our medical center. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the feasibility of this emerging operation. Methods This technique was performed by self-made glove single-port laparoscopic platform to radically resect low rectal cancer. Short-term postoperative results, including complications, length of hospital stay, and follow-up results were collected and analyzed statistically. Results There are five consecutive patients (three males, two females) who underwent this surgery and included in this study. The mean distance from the tumor to the anal verge was 4.8 cm (range 4.0–6.0). The surgery was completed in all cases, and the rectal tumor was removed successfully without conversion; circumferential margins of all the excised specimens were negative. The mean time of operation was 338.00 min (range 280–400). The average number of lymph node dissection was 12.20. The average postoperative hospital stay was 8.60 days. During the follow-up (14.80 ± 1.92 months), all preventive ileostomies were successfully closed in about 3 months after the surgery, all patients had satisfactory anal function, and no tumor recurrence was found. Conclusion Glove single-port laparoscopy-assisted TaTME has a significant effect in specific patients with low rectal cancer, with rapid recovery and high safety. Prospective randomized studies involving more case counts and long-term follow-up results, especially oncologic outcomes, are needed to validate this technique.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document