scholarly journals Risk assessment of deep vein thrombosis with D-dimer level in patients eligible for vascular surgery

2018 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-23
Author(s):  
Żanna Fiodorenko-Dumas ◽  
Przemysław Musz ◽  
Rajmund Adamiec
Keyword(s):  
Risk Assessment ◽  
Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Vascular Surgery ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Deep Vein ◽  
D Dimer

Risk Assessment Model to Predict Recurrence in Patients with Unprovoked Deep Vein Thrombosis or Pulmonary Embolism.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 452-452
Author(s):  
Sabine Eichinger ◽  
Georg Heinze ◽  
Paul Alexander Kyrle
Keyword(s):  
Risk Assessment ◽  
Pulmonary Embolism ◽  
Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Recurrence Risk ◽  
Assessment Model ◽  
Risk Scores ◽  
Risk Assessment Model ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Deep Vein ◽  
D Dimer

Abstract Abstract 452 Background: Venous thrombosis is a chronic and potentially fatal disease (case fatality 5-9%). Predicting the likelihood of recurrence is important, as most recurrences can be prevented by antithrombotic therapy, albeit at the price of an increased bleeding risk during anticoagulation. Despite a substantial progress in identifying the determinants of the recurrence risk, predicting recurrence in an individual patient is often not feasible. Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a multicausal disease and the combined effect of clinical and laboratory factors on the recurrence risk is unknown. It was the aim of our study to develop a simple risk model that improves prediction of the recurrence risk in patients with unprovoked VTE. Methods and Findings: In a prospective multicenter cohort study we followed 929 patients with a first VTE after completion of at least 3 months of anticoagulation. The median observation time was 43.3 months. Patients with VTE provoked by surgery, trauma, cancer, pregnancy or oral contraceptive intake were excluded as were those with a natural inhibitor deficiency or the lupus anticoagulant. The main outcome measure was symptomatic recurrent VTE, which occurred in 176 patients. The probability of recurrence (95% CI) after 2, 5 and 10 years was 13.8% (11.6% to16.5%), 24.6% (21.6% to 28.9%), and 31.8% (27.6% to 37.4%), respectively. To develop a simple and easy to apply risk assessment model, clinical and laboratory variables (age, sex, location of VTE, body mass index, factor V Leiden, prothrombin G20210A mutation, D-Dimer, in vitro thrombin generation) were preselected based on their established relevance for the recurrence risk, simple assessment, and reproducibility. All variables were analyzed in a Cox proportional hazards model, and those significantly associated with recurrence were used to compute risk scores. Only male sex [HR vs. female 1.90 (95% CI 1.31–2.75)], proximal deep vein thrombosis [HR vs. distal 2.08 (95% CI 1.16–3.74)], pulmonary embolism [HR vs. distal thrombosis 2.60 (95% CI 1.49– 4.53)] and elevated levels of D-Dimer [HR per doubling 1.27 (95% CI 1.08–1.51)] or peak thrombin [HR per 100 nM increase 1.38 (95% CI 1.17–1.63)] were related to a higher recurrence risk. We developed a nomogram (Fig. 1) based on sex, location of initial thrombosis, and D-Dimer that can be used to calculate risk scores and to estimate the cumulative probabilities of recurrence in an individual patient. The model has undergone extensive validation by a cross-validation process. The cohort was divided into test and validation samples thereby mimicking independent validation. This process was repeated 1000 times and the results were averaged to avoid dependence of the validation results on a particular partition of our cohort. Patients were assigned to different risk categories according to their risk score, which corresponded well with the recurrence rate as patients with lower scores had lower recurrence rates. Conclusion: By use of a simple scoring system the assessment of the recurrence risk in patients with a first unprovoked VTE can be improved in routine care. Patients with unprovoked VTE in whom the recurrence risk is low enough to consider a limited duration of anticoagulation, can be identified. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

scholarly journals Combination of a clinical risk assessment score and rapid whole blood D-dimer testing in the diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis in symptomatic patients

1999 ◽  
Vol 30 (5) ◽  
pp. 794-804 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew F. Lennox ◽  
Konstantinos T. Delis ◽  
Samuel Serunkuma ◽  
Zak A. Zarka ◽  
Styliani E. Daskalopoulou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Assessment ◽  
Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Whole Blood ◽  
Assessment Score ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Clinical Risk ◽  
Clinical Risk Assessment ◽  
Deep Vein ◽  
D Dimer

D-Dimers, Thrombin Antithrombin III Complexes and Prothrombin Fragments 1 + 2: Diagnostic value in Clinically Suspected Deep Vein Thrombosis

1991 ◽  
Vol 65 (01) ◽  
pp. 028-032 ◽  
Author(s):  
B Boneu ◽  
G Bes ◽  
H Pelzer ◽  
P Sié ◽  
H Boccalon
Keyword(s):  
Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Antithrombin Iii ◽  
High Sensitivity ◽  
Diagnostic Value ◽  
Predictive Values ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
High Negative Predictive Value ◽  
Deep Vein ◽  
D Dimer ◽  
Mercury Strain Gauge

SummaryThis study was performed to determine the accuracy of D-Dimer fibrin derivatives, thrombin-antithrombin III (TAT) complexes and prothrombin fragments 1 + 2 (F 1 + 2) determinations for the diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis (DVT). One hundred and sixteen consecutive patients referred to the angiology unit of our hospital for a clinically suspected DVT were investigated. They were submitted to mercury strain gauge plethysmography and to ultrasonic duplex scanning examination; in cases of inconclusive results or of proximal DVT (n = 35), an ascending phlebography was performed. After these investigations were completed, the diagnosis of DVT was confirmed in 34 and excluded in 82. One half of the patients were already under anticoagulant therapy at the time of investigation. The 3 biological markers were assayed using commercially available ELISA techniques and the D-Dimer was also assayed with a fast latex method. The normal distribution of these markers was established in 40 healthy blood donors. The most accurate assay for the diagnosis of DVT was the D-Dimer ELISA which had both a high sensitivity (94%) and a high negative predictive value (95%). The D-Dirner latex, TAT complexes and F 1 + 2 were far less sensitive and provided negative predictive values which ranged between 78 and 85%. In spite of positive and significant correlations between the levels of ihe 3 markers, their association did not improve their overall accuracy for detecting D\/L Therefore, with the exception of the D-Dimer ELISA, these markers were of little value for the diagnosis of DVT in this specific population.

Evaluation of a New Rapid Quantitative D-dimer Assay in Patients with Clinically Suspected Deep Vein Thrombosis

1996 ◽  
Vol 75 (03) ◽  
pp. 412-416 ◽  
Author(s):  
Armando D’Angelo ◽  
Gabriella D’Alessandro ◽  
Loredana Tomassini ◽  
Jean Louis Pittet ◽  
G Dupuy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Cost Savings ◽  
Pretest Probability ◽  
First Episode ◽  
Consecutive Series ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Baseline Testing ◽  
Deep Vein ◽  
D Dimer

SummaryThe sensitivity and specificity for deep vein thrombosis (DVT) of a new rapid, quantitative and precise (total imprecision < 10%) D-dimer assay suitable for individual measurements (VIDAS D-DIMER, bio-Merieux, France) were evaluated in a consecutive series of 103 in- and out-patients submitted to serial compression ultrasonography (C-US) for the clinical suspicion of DVT (n = 66) or of DVT recurrence (n = 37) and symptoms lasting from 1 to 15 days. DVT was found in 22 patients at baseline testing and no patient with an initially negative C-US developed vein incompressibility at follow up. The time elapsed from the onset of symptoms was negatively associated with D-dimer levels both in patients with and in those without DVT. In the entire series of patients, the sensitivity of a positive D-dimer test (≥1.0 Μg/ml) for the presence of DVT was 96% (21/22 patients, 95% confidence interval 75-100%) with a specificity of 75% (64-84%), a negative predictive value of 98% (90-100%), a positive predictive value of 51% (35-67%), and an overall accuracy of 80% (70-87%). A normal D-dimer value (0.22 Μg/ml) was observed in one patient with DVT and symptoms lasting from 15 days. The approach of withholding C-US testing in patients with symptoms lasting from less than 11 days and D-dimer levels below the cut-off value was compared to serial C-US testing alone in a cost-effectiveness analysis subdividing the 66 patients with a first episode according to their clinical pretest probability of DVT. Thrombosis was detected in 6.7% of the patients in the low probability group (n = 15), 16.7% of the patients in the moderate probability group (n = 24), 51.9% of the patients in the high probability group (n = 27) and 8.1% of patients with suspected DVT recurrence. Calculated cost-savings for each DVT diagnosed ranged from 5% in the high pretest probability group to 55% in the low pretest probability group and to 77% in patients with suspected DVT recurrence.The safety of avoiding C-US testing in symptomatic patients with a negative D-dimer test should be evaluated in clinical management studies.

D-Dimer Test and Diagnosis of Deep Vein Thrombosis: A Comparative Study of 7 Assays

1996 ◽  
Vol 76 (04) ◽  
pp. 518-522 ◽  
Author(s):  
A Elias ◽  
I Aptel ◽  
B Huc ◽  
J J Chale ◽  
F Nguyen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Negative Predictive Value ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Latex Agglutination ◽  
Lower Limbs ◽  
First Episode ◽  
Lower Sensitivity ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Deep Vein ◽  
D Dimer

SummaryThe current D-Dimer ELISA methods provide high sensitivity and negative predictive value for the diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis but these methods are not suitable for emergency or for individual determination. We have evaluated the performance of 3 newly available fast D-Dimer assays (Vidas D-Di, BioMerieux; Instant IA D-Di, Stago; Nycocard D-Dimer, Nycomed) in comparison with 3 classic ELISA methods (Stago, Organon, Behring) and a Latex agglutination technique (Stago). One-hundred-and-seventy-one patients suspected of presenting a first episode of deep vein thrombosis were investigated. A deep vein thrombosis was detected in 75 patients (43.8%) by ultrasonic duplex scanning of the lower limbs; in 11 of them the thrombi were distal and very limited in size (<2 cm). We compared the performance of the tests by calculating their sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value for different cut-off levels and by calculating the area under ROC curves. The concordance of the different methods was evaluated by calculating the kappa coefficient. The performances of the 3 classic ELISA and of the Vidas D-Di were comparable and kappa coefficients indicated a good concordance between the results provided by these assays. Their sensitivity slightly declined for detection of the very small thrombi. Instant IA D-Di had a non-significantly lower sensitivity and negative predictive value than the 4 previous assays; however its performance was excellent for out-patients. As expected, the Latex assay had too low a sensitivity and negative predictive value to be recommended. In our hands, Nycocard D-Dimer also exhibited low sensitivity and negative predictive value, which were significantly improved when the plasma samples were tested by the manufacturer. Thus significant progress has been made, allowing clinical studies to be planned to compare the safety and cost-effectiveness of D-Dimer strategy to those of the conventional methods for the diagnosis of venous thrombosis.

Rapid Quantitative D-dimer Assay and Clinical Evaluation for the Diagnosis of Clinically Suspected Deep Vein Thrombosis

1997 ◽  
Vol 77 (03) ◽  
pp. 602-603 ◽  
Author(s):  
J Y Borg ◽  
H Lévesque ◽  
N Cailleux ◽  
C Franc ◽  
M F Hellot ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Clinical Evaluation ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Deep Vein ◽  
D Dimer

scholarly journals Performance of age-adjusted D-dimer values for predicting DVT before the knee and hip arthroplasty

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jian Xiang Wu ◽  
Jiang Hui Qing ◽  
Yao Yao ◽  
Dong Yang Chen ◽  
Qing Jiang
Keyword(s):  
Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Joint Arthroplasty ◽  
Receiver Operating Curve ◽  
Multiple Logistic Regression ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Specificity And Sensitivity ◽  
Knee And Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Deep Vein ◽  
D Dimer

Abstract Purpose To compare the specificity and sensitivity of preoperative D-dimer and age-adjusted D-dimer value for predicting the incidence of the DVT preoperatively in total joint arthroplasty (TJA) patients. Methods We enrolled 406 patients finally above 50 years old. Everyone had done ultrasonography bedside, and D-dimer concentrations were collected before surgery. The D-dimer and age-adjusted D-dimer cut-off was calculated by multiple logistic regression and receiver operating curve (ROC) analyses. Results A total of 39 patients had found asymptomatic deep vein thrombosis (DVT) by ultrasonography. The age (odds ratio [OR] 1.067; p = 0.003) and D-dimer (OR 1.331; p = 0.025) were related to the existence of DVT. For conventional D-dimer and age-adjusted D-dimer value, the area under the curves (AUCs) were 0.685 (0.499–0.696) and 0.795 (0.611–0.881), respectively. Conclusion Compared to traditional D-dimer, age-adjusted D-dimer showed better performance in screening DVT, which was useful clinically.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document