scholarly journals Public perception of a dangerous person in psychotic exacerbation on the example of a court expert judgement case

2017 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 36-43 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maciej Dziurkowski ◽  
Ewelina Dziurkowska ◽  
Maciej Zbyszkowicz
Keyword(s):  
Public Perception ◽  
Expert Judgement ◽  
Court Expert ◽  
Psychotic Exacerbation

How Children Are Doing: The Mismatch between Public Perception and Statistical Reality

2003 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lina Guzman ◽  
Laura Lippman ◽  
Kristin Anderson Moore ◽  
William O'Hare
Keyword(s):  
Public Perception

Public Perception of Juvenile Culpability and Competency to Stand Trial in Criminal Court

2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roni Mayzer ◽  
April R. Bradley ◽  
Erin Olufs ◽  
Mariah Laver ◽  
Brittany Bushaw ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Public Perception ◽  
Criminal Court ◽  
Competency To Stand Trial

Kepuasan Masyarakat Terhadap Pelayanan Kelurahan Setelah Pemekaran Di Tangerang Selatan

Liquidity ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 151-159
Author(s):  
Pitri Yandri
Keyword(s):  
Public Perception ◽  
Service Personnel ◽  
Urban Services ◽  
Hospitality Workers ◽  
Care Workers ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Cartesian Diagram ◽  
Better Than

The purpose of this study is (1) to analyze public perception on urban services before and after the expansion of the region, (2) analyze the level of people's satisfaction with urban services, and (3) analyze the determinants of the variables that determine what level of people's satisfaction urban services. This study concluded that first, after the expansion, the quality of urban services in South Tangerang City is better than before. Secondly, however, public satisfaction with the services only reached 48.53% (poor scale). Third, by using a Cartesian Diagram, the second priority that must be addressed are: (1) clarity of service personnel, (2) the discipline of service personnel, (3) responsibility for care workers; (4) the speed of service, (5) the ability of officers services, (6) obtain justice services, and (7) the courtesy and hospitality workers.

Social and political dimension of stigmatization: The development of Natasha and Maria images for immigrants in Istanbul

2016 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 159-168
Author(s):  
Bayram Unal
Keyword(s):  
Public Perception ◽  
Daily Life ◽  
Legal Framework ◽  
State Law ◽  
Migrant Women ◽  
Political Dimension ◽  
Security Forces ◽  
Official Discourse ◽  
The Third ◽  
The Impact

This study aims at understanding how the perceptions about migrants have been created and transferred into daily life as a stigmatization by means of public perception, media and state law implementations.  The focus would be briefly what kind of consequences these perceptions and stigmatization might lead. First section will examine the background of migration to Turkey briefly and make a summary of migration towards Turkey by 90s. Second section will briefly evaluate the preferential legal framework, which constitutes the base for official discourse differentiating the migrants and implementations of security forces that can be described as discriminatory. The third section deals with the impact of perceptions influential in both formation and reproduction of inclusive and exclusive practices towards migrant women. Additionally, impact of public perception in classifying the migrants and migratory processes would be dealt in this section.

lmost all estimates of the figure of Alexander Solzhenitsyn are not related to literary criticism. Most studies evaluate his role, intentions and results. His figure is assessed in the context of the fate of the country, public perception and attitude to the country, which is Motherland for some, and mental and political enemy for the others. And for this purpose it is not even important who is right from the historical and political point of view. The point is who and how perceived the USSR and the entire Soviet project. Solzhenitsyn is seen as the enemy of the USSR and the Soviet project by those who popularized and helped him, and also according to his self-evaluation. Therefore, for those who identify themselves with the Soviet Union, its heritage and the entire Soviet project Solzhenitsyn represents the enemy and bearer of evil. For those who are hostile to the Soviet Union and the Soviet project, Solzhenitsyn is an ally in their struggle and bearer of good. Which of these parties is right is the issue of history and morality. 66% of Russian citizens support the first point of view, and the second point of view is supported by 25% of the population. Nowadays 88 % of Russian citizens know who Solzhenitsyn was. 31% consider him to be moral authority for them. 8% of the people believe that Solzhenitsyn presented true facts in his books.

2019 ◽  
Vol 66 ◽  
pp. 260-275
Author(s):  
Victor V.  Aksyuchits
Keyword(s):  
Soviet Union ◽  
Literary Criticism ◽  
Public Perception ◽  
Moral Authority ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Self Evaluation ◽  
Political Ideas ◽  
The Soviet Union ◽  
The People ◽  
Russian Intelligentsia

In the article the author studies the formation process of Russian intelligentsia analyzing its «birth marks», such as nihilism, estrangement from native soil, West orientation, infatuation with radical political ideas, Russophobia. The author examines the causes of political radicalization of Russian intelligentsia that grew swiftly at the end of the 19th and beginning of the 20th centuries and played an important role in the Russian revolution of 1917.

Assessment of public perception and attitude regarding obesity and bariatric surgery in Aljouf region, Saudi Arabia

2020 ◽  
pp. 358-364
Author(s):  
Ahmed Alghutayghit ◽  
Abdulsalam Alanazi ◽  
Hany Elhady ◽  
Saleh Alzaid ◽  
Ghalib Alsulami ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bariatric Surgery ◽  
Saudi Arabia ◽  
Public Perception

Udział biegłego w postępowaniu egzekucyjnym w sytuacji określonej w art . 853 k.p.c.– zagadnienia wybrane w ujęciu historycznym

2016 ◽  
pp. 117-128
Author(s):  
Monika Dziewulska
Keyword(s):  
Historical Perspective ◽  
Civil Procedure ◽  
Court Expert ◽  
Current Code ◽  
Made In

The author explains the institution of a court expert in enforcement proceedings, describing problems in historical perspective, primarily referring to the regulations contained in the Code of Civil Procedure of 1932. Particular attention is given to the regulations contained in Article 853 of the current Code of Civil Procedure, by submitting proposals under at the legislature for the introduction of the obligation probable allegations made in the complaint to estimate the movables of the debtor or creditor as well as the need for the appointment of an expert by a bailiff if the bailiff does not have knowledge in a particular field and can not independently make estimates.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document