scholarly journals Percutaneous cholecystostomy for delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with acute cholecystitis: analysis of a single-centre experience and literature review

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
pp. 250-255
Author(s):  
Erdinc Kamer ◽  
Fevzi Cengiz ◽  
Volkan Cakir ◽  
Omur Balli ◽  
Turan Acar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Literature Review ◽  
Acute Cholecystitis ◽  
Percutaneous Cholecystostomy ◽  
Single Centre ◽  
Delayed Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Single Centre Experience

Time to abandon the old dictum of delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy after acute cholecystitis has settled in Caribbean practice

2021 ◽  
pp. 004947552110100
Author(s):  
Shamir O Cawich ◽  
Avidesh H Mahabir ◽  
Sahle Griffith ◽  
Patrick FaSiOen ◽  
Vijay Naraynsingh
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Acute Cholecystitis ◽  
Gold Standard ◽  
Standard Treatment ◽  
Gallstone Disease ◽  
Acute Attack ◽  
Early Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Delayed Surgery ◽  
Delayed Cholecystectomy ◽  
Delayed Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

Although laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the gold standard treatment for acute cholecystitis, many Caribbean surgeons are reluctant to operate during the acute attack. We collected data for all consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis from January 1 to 31 December 2018. Delayed cholecystectomy was done >6 weeks after acute cholecystitis settled. We compared data between early and delayed groups. Delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy was performed in 54 patients, and 42 had early laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Delayed surgery resulted in significantly more complications requiring readmission (39% vs 0), longer operations (2.27 vs 0.94 h) and lengthier post-operative hospitalisation (1.84 vs 1.1 days). Caribbean hospitals should abandon the practice of delayed surgery after cholecystitis has settled. Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy would be financially advantageous for our institutions, and it would save patients recurrent attacks of gallstone disease.

scholarly journals LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY;

2013 ◽  
Vol 20 (02) ◽  
pp. 313-318
Author(s):  
MOHAMMAD ADNAN NAZEER ◽  
HASAAN IMTIAZ ◽  
HARUN MAJID DAR ◽  
Zulfiqar Ali ◽  
Asma Samreen
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Acute Cholecystitis ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Early Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Delayed Cholecystectomy ◽  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Group ◽  
Delayed Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Delayed Group ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Group 1

Introduction: The role of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in treatment of acute cholecystitis is still controversial. Objective:The objective of this prospective randomized controlled trial was to evaluate the outcomes of early laparoscopic cholecystectomy foracute cholecystitis and to compare the results with delayed cholecystectomy. Setting: Sheikh Zayed Hospital, Lahore. Period: 1st Feb,2012 to 31st July 2012. Materials & Methods: 60 diagnosed patients of acute cholecystitis were randomly allocated to two groups,Group 1 underwent early laparoscopic cholecystectomy (Group 1, n = 30) and Group 2 to initial conservative treatment followed bydelayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy, 6 to 12 weeks later (Group 2 , n = 30). Results: The overall complication rate was 3.3% (01) inearly group and 16.7% (05) in the delayed group. There was no common bile duct injury in both groups. The complications includedwound infection and intraperitoneal collection. Conclusions: According to the results our study we concluded that early laparoscopiccholecystectomy can safely be carried out for acute cholecystitis as the complications for early laparoscopic cholecystectomy are lessas compared to delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy has also an edge over delayed because ofsingle hospital stay.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document