scholarly journals Incremental validity of positive orientation: predictive efficiency beyond the five-factor model

2016 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
pp. 294-302
Author(s):  
Łukasz Roland Miciuk ◽  
Tomasz Jankowski ◽  
Piotr Oleś
Keyword(s):  
Factor Model ◽  
Five Factor Model ◽  
Incremental Validity ◽  
Positive Orientation ◽  
Predictive Efficiency

Incremental validity of the Structured Interview for the Five‐Factor Model of Personality (SIFFM)

2005 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 343-357 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephanie D. Stepp ◽  
Timothy J. Trull ◽  
Rachel M. Burr ◽  
Mimi Wolfenstein ◽  
Angela Z. Vieth
Keyword(s):  
Personality Disorder ◽  
Personality Traits ◽  
Clinical Utility ◽  
Factor Model ◽  
Five Factor Model ◽  
Structured Interview ◽  
Incremental Validity ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Histrionic Personality Disorder

This study examined the incremental validity of the Structured Interview for the Five‐Factor Model (SIFFM; Trull & Widiger, 1997) scores in the prediction of borderline, antisocial, and histrionic personality disorder symptoms above and beyond variance accounted for by scores from the Schedule for Nonadaptive and Adaptive Personality (SNAP; Clark, 1993), a self‐report questionnaire that includes items relevant to both normal (i.e. Big Three) and abnormal personality traits. Approximately 200 participants (52 clinical outpatients, and 149 nonclinical individuals from a borderline‐features‐enriched sample) completed the SIFFM, the SNAP, and select sections of the Personality Disorder Interview—IV (PDI‐IV; Widiger, Mangine, Corbitt, Ellis, & Thomas, 1995). We found support for the incremental validity of SIFFM scores, further indicating the clinical utility of this instrument. However, results also supported the incremental validity of SNAP scores in many cases. We discuss the implications of the findings in terms of dimensional approaches to personality disorder assessment. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

The validity of FFM personality dimensions and maladaptive traits to predict negative affects at work: a six month prospective study in a military sample

2003 ◽  
Vol 17 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. S101-S121 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean‐Pierre Rolland ◽  
Filip De Fruyt
Keyword(s):  
Negative Affect ◽  
Prospective Study ◽  
Military Personnel ◽  
Factor Model ◽  
Five Factor Model ◽  
Incremental Validity ◽  
Factor Space ◽  
Axis Ii ◽  
Negative Affects ◽  
Negative Predictor

The present work explores what the domain of maladaptive traits has to offer to the industrial and organizational (I/O) field investigating the incremental validity of maladaptive traits from DSM Axis II to predict negative emotions experienced at work, beyond Five‐Factor Model dimensions. This study was designed to examine the validity of adaptive and maladaptive traits to predict four negative affects (Anger, Fear, Sadness, and Shame) experienced at work in military personnel. The design was longitudinal, including two measurement moments, i.e. prior to and immediately after returning from a peace mission in a foreign country. The four negative affects were largely stable across a six month interval. FFM dimensions substantially explained negative affects experienced six months later, although the variance accounted for varied strongly across affects. In line with previous research, emotional stability was a consistent negative predictor of negative affects at both measurement moments. Two maladaptive traits derived from DSM Axis II (i.e. Borderline and Avoidant) were consistently related to specific negative affects experienced at work. Finally, maladaptive traits did not predict negative affect variance beyond FFM traits. These results are in line with robust findings suggesting that maladaptive trait patterns could be integrated in the five‐factor space, and as a consequence have little or no incremental utility over FFM dimensions. Copyright © 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Personality Testing and Industrial–Organizational Psychology: Reflections, Progress, and Prospects

2008 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 272-290 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leaetta M. Hough ◽  
Frederick L. Oswald
Keyword(s):  
Factor Model ◽  
Five Factor Model ◽  
Organizational Psychology ◽  
Incremental Validity ◽  
Personality Testing ◽  
Personality Tests ◽  
Organizational Research ◽  
Broad Perspective ◽  
Industrial Organizational Psychology ◽  
Multidimensional Models

As the title suggests, this article takes a broad perspective on personality as it is conceptualized and measured in organizational research, and in the spirit of this Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology journal, we framed the article as a series of 7 questions. These 7 questions deal with (1) personality and multidimensional models of performance, (2) personality taxonomies and the five-factor model, (3) the effects of situations on personality–performance relationships, (4) the incremental validity of personality over cognitive ability, (5) the need to differentiate personality constructs from personality measures, (6) the concern with faking on personality tests, and (7) the use of personality tests in attempting to address adverse impact. We dovetail these questions with our perspectives and insights in the hope that this will stimulate further discussion with our readership.

scholarly journals Assessment of Fluctuation Between Grandiose and Vulnerable Narcissism: Development and Initial Validation of the FLUX Scales

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joshua R. Oltmanns ◽  
Thomas A. Widiger
Keyword(s):  
Discriminant Validity ◽  
Factor Model ◽  
Five Factor Model ◽  
Incremental Validity ◽  
Pathological Narcissism ◽  
Vulnerable Narcissism ◽  
Convergent And Discriminant Validity ◽  
Affective Lability ◽  
Pathological Narcissism Inventory ◽  
Item Scale

There is a growing interest in the distinction between grandiose and vulnerable narcissism, along with a hypothesis of a fluctuation between grandiose and vulnerable narcissism within individuals. There are several well-validated measures of both grandiose and vulnerable narcissism, but research has generally found that they are relatively distinct in their relations with their nomological networks. Further, the existing measures of narcissism do not actually assess for a possible fluctuation. The present study developed three scales of narcissistic fluctuation: Fluctuation between Indifference and Anger, Grandiosity and Shame, and Assertiveness and Insecurity. Consistent with expectations, the FLUX scales correlated with both grandiose and vulnerable narcissism, displayed convergent and discriminant validity with factor derived-narcissism scales and the five-factor model, and correlated at moderate-to-large effect sizes with measures of affective lability. The three FLUX scales were also reduced to one unidimensional nine-item scale of narcissistic fluctuation (the g-FLUX) that retained the correlational properties for the more specific scales and had incremental validity over the Five-Factor Narcissism Inventory and Pathological Narcissism Inventory grandiose and vulnerable scales in accounting for affective lability. Results from the present study suggest that the FLUX scales may provide an informative assessment of a fluctuation between grandiose and vulnerable narcissism.

Hardiness Scales in Iranian Managers: Evidence of Incremental Validity in Relationships with the Five Factor Model and with Organizational and Psychological Adjustment

2005 ◽  
Vol 96 (3) ◽  
pp. 775-781 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nima Ghorbani ◽  
P. J. Watson
Keyword(s):  
Job Satisfaction ◽  
Work Environment ◽  
Psychological Adjustment ◽  
Perceived Stress ◽  
Factor Model ◽  
Five Factor Model ◽  
Self Esteem ◽  
Openness To Experience ◽  
Incremental Validity ◽  
External Control

This study examined the incremental validity of Hardiness scales in a sample of Iranian managers. Along with measures of the Five Factor Model and of Organizational and Psychological Adjustment, Hardiness scales were administered to 159 male managers ( M age = 39.9, SD = 7.5) who had worked in their organizations for 7.9 yr. ( SD = 5.4). Hardiness predicted greater Job Satisfaction, higher Organization-based Self-esteem, and perceptions of the work environment as being less stressful and constraining. Hardiness also correlated positively with Assertiveness, Emotional Stability, Extraversion, Openness to Experience, Agreeableness, and Conscientiousness and negatively with Depression, Anxiety, Perceived Stress, Chance External Control, and a Powerful Others External Control. Evidence of incremental validity was obtained when the Hardiness scales supplemented the Five Factor Model in predicting organizational and psychological adjustment. These data documented the incremental validity of the Hardiness scales in a non-Western sample and thus confirmed once again that Hardiness has a relevance that extends beyond the culture in which it was developed.

Comparing the Triarchic and Five-Factor Trait Models: Relations With Psychopathy and Other Clinical Criteria in an Incarcerated Offender Sample

2019 ◽  
Vol 33 (6) ◽  
pp. 792-817 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah J. Brislin ◽  
Peter Cernohorsky ◽  
Christopher J. Patrick ◽  
Laura E. Drislane ◽  
Maria Caruso ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Factor Model ◽  
Five Factor Model ◽  
Incremental Validity ◽  
Personality Dimensions ◽  
Clinical Criteria ◽  
Male Offenders ◽  
Self Harm ◽  
Psychopathic Tendencies ◽  
Triarchic Model

This study compared how normative personality dimensions of the Five-Factor Model (FFM) and neurobehavioral traits of the triarchic model relate to psychopathic tendencies and clinical outcomes in an incarcerated sample of 277 Italian male offenders. Associations between triarchic model traits, measured using the TriPM and the FFM dimensions, measured using the NEO-FFI, were consistent with prior studies. Scores on the TriPM, particularly the Disinhibition scale, were associated with substance abuse and self-harm behavior over and above the presence of psychopathy, and beyond the personality dimensions indexed by the NEO-FFI. By contrast, the Neuroticism and Extraversion scales showed incremental validity, over and above psychopathy and TriPM scores, in predicting depressive tendencies. Lastly, both NEO-FFI and TriPM scales contributed to prediction of staff ratings of behavior in prison and prognosis for release, above and beyond psychopathy. These findings highlight potential advantages of the FFM and triarchic trait models for predicting clinical outcomes.

The relation between elevation and self-reported prosocial behavior: Incremental validity over the Five-Factor Model of Personality

2009 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 71-84 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shauna K. Landis ◽  
Martin F. Sherman ◽  
Ralph L. Piedmont ◽  
Matthew W. Kirkhart ◽  
Edward M. Rapp ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prosocial Behavior ◽  
Factor Model ◽  
Five Factor Model ◽  
Incremental Validity

TWO FACETS OF SELF-KNOWLEDGE, THE FIVE-FACTOR MODEL, AND PROMOTIONS AMONG IRANIAN MANAGERS

2004 ◽  
Vol 32 (8) ◽  
pp. 769-776 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nima Ghorbani ◽  
P. J. Watson
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Perceived Stress ◽  
Factor Model ◽  
Five Factor Model ◽  
Incremental Validity ◽  
Research Attention ◽  
Self Knowledge ◽  
Attributional Complexity ◽  
Knowledge Scale ◽  
Anxiety Depression

Reflective and Experiential Self-Knowledge Scales were administered to Iranian managers along with measures of the Five Factor Model, anxiety, depression, perceived stress, and attributional complexity. Experiential Self-Knowledge correlated positively with the number of promotions earned by these managers. Both scales were associated with higher levels of Agreeableness, Openness to Experience, and Extraversion and, in general, with greater self-reported mental health. Each Self-Knowledge Scale displayed evidence of incremental validity. These data confirmed that the Reflective and Experiential Self-Knowledge Scales deserve additional research attention.

scholarly journals Positive Orientation and the Five-Factor Model

2016 ◽  
Vol 47 (1) ◽  
pp. 141-148 ◽  
Author(s):  
Łukasz Roland Miciuk ◽  
Tomasz Jankowski ◽  
Agnieszka Laskowska ◽  
Piotr Oleś
Keyword(s):  
Satisfaction With Life ◽  
Factor Model ◽  
Five Factor Model ◽  
Satisfaction With Life Scale ◽  
Positive Orientation ◽  
Canonical Correlations ◽  
Life Orientation Test ◽  
Life Scale ◽  
Neo Five Factor Inventory ◽  
Positive Correlations

Abstract The aim of the present study was to investigate the relationship between positive orientation (PO) defined as a basic predisposition to perceive and evaluate positive aspects of life, the future and oneself and the Five-Factor Model of personality (FFM). Hypotheses postulated positive correlations between PO and extraversion, conscientiousness, agreeableness and openness; a negative correlation was predicted between PO and neuroticism. Two hundred Polish students completed the following measures: SES (Self-Esteem Scale, Rosenberg), SWLS (The Satisfaction with Life Scale; Diener, Emmons, Larson & Griffin), LOT-R (The Life Orientation Test - Revised; Scheier, Carver & Bridges) and NEOFFI (NEO Five Factor Inventory, Costa & McCrae). The results confirmed correlations between PO and extraversion, conscientiousness, and neuroticism; correlations with openness and agreeableness were not supported. According to canonical correlations, PO shows a clear affinity to the FFM.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document