Intraoperative opioid and non-opioid administration patterns and early postoperative pain: A single-center retrospective longitudinal study

2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (5) ◽  
pp. 389-405
Author(s):  
Gregory Smith, MD ◽  
Marcel E. Durieux, MD, PhD ◽  
Siny Tsang, PhD ◽  
Bhiken I. Naik, MBBCh
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Elective Surgery ◽  
Opioid Analgesic ◽  
Oral Morphine ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Single Center ◽  
Opioid Use ◽  
Pain Scores ◽  
Opioid Administration ◽  
Over Time

Objective: Characterize changes in intraoperative opioid and non-opioid administration over time and to evaluate self-reported pain scores in the immediate postoperative period.Design: Single-center retrospective longitudinal study.Setting: Academic medical center.Patients, participants: All patients presenting for surgery between 2011 and 2017 in both an inpatient and outpatient setting.Main outcome measure(s): Determine total intraoperative opioid administration using intravenous oral morphine equivalents standardized to weight and intraoperative non-opioid use. Furthermore, postoperative self-reported pain scores within 2 hours of completion of surgery are reported.Results: A total of 112,167 individual cases were identified from March 2011 to June 2017. There was a sustained and significant reduction in intraoperative mean and median opioid administration [2011: 0.16 ± 0.15 mg/kg and 0.13 (0-4.92) mg/kg vs 2017: 0.09 ± 0.09 mg/kg and 0.07 (0-4.17) mg/kg]. These effects are seen in emergent vs elective surgery, ambulatory vs inpatient, preoperative opioid use vs no preoperative opioid use, and those with and without intraoperative loco-regional procedures. Although median number of intraoperative non-opioid analgesic agents was unchanged over time, average difference in the number of intraoperative non-opioids increased over time. Finally, pain scores decreased over time [2011: mean (standard deviation) and median (range): 5.1 ± 2.62 and 5.4 (0-10) vs 2017: 3.29 ± 3.27 and 3 (0-10)].Conclusion: This study confirms that intraoperative opioid use has decreased over time with increased utilization of non-opioid analgesic adjuncts and a commensurate decrease in immediate postoperative pain.

scholarly journals Participants with mild, moderate, or severe pain following total hip arthroplasty. A sub-study of the PANSAID trial on paracetamol and ibuprofen for postoperative pain treatment

2021 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
Luma Mahmoud Issa ◽  
Kasper Højgaard Thybo ◽  
Daniel Hägi-Pedersen ◽  
Jørn Wetterslev ◽  
Janus Christian Jakobsen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Severe Pain ◽  
Pain Treatment ◽  
Opioid Analgesic ◽  
Opioid Use ◽  
Mild Pain ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
Pain Scores

AbstractObjectivesIn this sub-study of the ‘Paracetamol and Ibuprofen in Combination’ (PANSAID) trial, in which participants were randomised to one of four different non-opioids analgesic regimen consisting of paracetamol, ibuprofen, or a combination of the two after planned primary total hip arthroplasty, our aims were to investigate the distribution of participants’ pain (mild, moderate or severe), integrate opioid use and pain to a single score (Silverman Integrated Approach (SIA)-score), and identify preoperative risk factors for severe pain.MethodsWe calculated the proportions of participants with mild (VAS 0–30 mm), moderate (VAS 31–60 mm) or severe (VAS 61–100 mm) pain and the SIA-scores (a sum of rank-based percentage differences from the mean rank in pain scores and opioid use, ranging from −200 to 200%). Using logistic regression with backwards elimination, we investigated the association between severe pain and easily obtainable preoperative patient characteristics.ResultsAmong 556 participants from the modified intention-to-treat population, 33% (95% CI: 26–42) (Group Paracetamol + Ibuprofen (PCM + IBU)), 28% (95% CI: 21–37) (Group Paracetamol (PCM)), 23% (95% CI: 17–31) (Group Ibuprofen (IBU)), and 19% (95% CI: 13–27) (Group Half Strength-Paracetamol + Ibuprofen (HS-PCM + IBU)) experienced mild pain 6 h postoperatively during mobilisation. Median SIA-scores during mobilisation were: Group PCM + IBU: −48% (IQR: −112 to 31), Group PCM: 40% (IQR: −31 to 97), Group IBU: −5% (IQR: −57 to 67), and Group HS-PCM + IBU: 6% (IQR: −70 to 74) (overall difference: p=0.0001). Use of analgesics before surgery was the only covariate associated with severe pain (non-opioid: OR 0.50, 95% CI: 0.29–0.82, weak opioid 0.56, 95% CI: 0.28–1.16, reference no analgesics before surgery, p=0.02).ConclusionsOnly one third of participants using paracetamol and ibuprofen experienced mild pain after total hip arthroplasty and even fewer experienced mild pain using each drug alone as basic non-opioid analgesic treatment. We were not able, in any clinically relevant way, to predict severe postoperative pain. A more extensive postoperative pain regimen than paracetamol, ibuprofen and opioids may be needed for a large proportion of patients having total hip arthroplasty. SIA-scores integrate pain scores and opioid use for the individual patient and may add valuable information in acute pain research.

The association of sex with pain scores and perioperative opioid administration following laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sadeq A Quraishi ◽  
Sonika Seth ◽  
Luis Fernando Gonzalez-Ciccarelli ◽  
Mohammad Dahlawi ◽  
Renan Ferrufino ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sleeve Gastrectomy ◽  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy ◽  
Postoperative Pain Management ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Single Center ◽  
Pain Scores ◽  
Opioid Administration ◽  
Lower Pain ◽  
Linear Regressions

Aim: We investigated whether sex is associated with pain scores and opioid administration after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Materials & methods: We performed a single-center, retrospective analysis of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy patients from December 2016–July 2018. Multivariable linear regressions were performed to investigate the association of sex with pain scores and opioid administration. Results: Baseline pain scores were similar between women and men (n = 266; 78% women). Men reported lower pain scores in all phases of care and received more opioids during their hospitalization (ß = 25.48; 95% CI: 5.77–45.20; p = 0.01), compared with women. Conclusion: Our data suggest that women self-report greater postoperative pain scores, while men received more opioids during their hospitalization. Further studies are needed to understand the reasons for such differences in postoperative pain management.

Pain and Opioid Analgesic Use After Otorhinolaryngologic Surgery

2020 ◽  
Vol 163 (6) ◽  
pp. 1178-1185 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew Kim ◽  
Ashutosh Kacker ◽  
David I. Kutler ◽  
Abtin Tabaee ◽  
Michael G. Stewart ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Opioid Analgesic ◽  
Opioid Use ◽  
Or Education ◽  
Psychometric Instrument ◽  
Pain Scores ◽  
Demographic Surveys ◽  
Almost All ◽  
Analgesic Use ◽  
Preoperative Factors

Objective To quantify pain and opioid use after otorhinolaryngologic surgery. To determine the effect of patient and surgical factors on primary outcomes. Study Design Prospective cohort. Setting Tertiary academic hospital. Subjects and Methods Patients undergoing elective otorhinolaryngologic surgery were prospectively enrolled. Patients completed demographic surveys and psychometric questionnaires assessing attitudes toward pain and baseline anxiety and depression before surgery. After surgery, patients documented peak pain levels (0-100 mm, visual analog scale) and daily prescription and nonprescription analgesic requirements over a 2-week period. Average daily and cumulative pain and opioid use were calculated and compared among patient cohorts stratified by procedure and preoperative factors. Results A total of 134 patients were enrolled. Total tonsillectomy was associated with significantly higher pain scores and opioid consumption, as compared to all other procedures. There was moderate correlation between average cumulative pain and opioid use. Older patients required significantly fewer doses of opioids. There was no effect of sex, marital status, or education level on postoperative pain or opioid use. Psychometric instrument scores and chronic pain or analgesic use were not associated with significant differences in pain or opioid requirements. Most patients were prescribed substantially more opioids than they actually required. Conclusion Postoperative pain following elective otorhinolaryngologic surgery decreases dramatically within the first week and requires only few days of opioid analgesia, with the exception of tonsillectomy. Almost all patients required fewer than 15 doses of opioids.

scholarly journals The Association between Implementation an Enhanced Recovery after Cesarean Pathway with Standardized Discharge Prescriptions and Opioid Use and Pain Experience after Cesarean Delivery

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer A. McCoy ◽  
Sarah Gutman ◽  
Rebecca F. Hamm ◽  
Sindhu K. Srinivas
Keyword(s):  
Cesarean Delivery ◽  
Pain Control ◽  
Enhanced Recovery ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Baseline Survey ◽  
Quality Improvement Initiative ◽  
Opioid Use ◽  
Pain Scores ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Hospital Patients

Objective This study was aimed to evaluate opioid use after cesarean delivery (CD) and to assess implementation of an enhanced recovery after CD (ERAS-CD) pathway and its association with inpatient and postdischarge pain control and opioid use. Study Design We conducted a baseline survey of women who underwent CD from January to March 2017 at a single, urban academic hospital. Patients were called 5 to 8 days after discharge and asked about their pain and postdischarge opioid use. An ERAS-CD pathway was implemented as a quality improvement initiative, including use of nonopioid analgesia and standardization of opioid discharge prescriptions to ≤25 tablets of oxycodone of 5 mg. From November to January 2019, a postimplementation survey was conducted to assess the association between this initiative and patients' pain control and postoperative opioid use, both inpatient and postdischarge. Results Data were obtained from 152 women preimplementation (PRE) and 137 women post-implementation (POST); complete survey data were obtained from 102 women PRE and 98 women POST. The median inpatient morphine milligram equivalents consumed per patient decreased significantly from 141 [range: 90–195] PRE to 114 [range: 45–168] POST (p = 0.002). On a 0- to 10-point scale, median patient-reported pain scores at discharge decreased significantly (PRE: 7 [range: 5–8] vs. POST 5 [range: 3–7], p < 0.001). The median number of pills consumed after discharge also decreased significantly (PRE: 25 [range: 16–30] vs. POST 17.5 [range: 4–25], p = 0.001). The number of pills consumed was significantly associated with number prescribed (p < 0.001). The median number of leftover pills and number of refills did not significantly differ between groups. Median patient-reported pain scores at the week after discharge were lower in the POST group (PRE: 4 [range: 2–6] vs. POST 3[range: 1–5], p = 0.03). Conclusion Implementing an ERAS-CD pathway was associated with a significant decrease in inpatient and postdischarge opioid consumption while improving pain control. Our data suggest that even fewer pills could be prescribed for some patients. Key Points

scholarly journals Predicted Versus Non-Predicted Opioid Administration Using Preoperative Pain Sensitivity in Patients Undergoing Gynecological Surgery: A Randomized-Controlled Trial

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 585
Author(s):  
Sun-Kyung Park ◽  
Hansol Kim ◽  
Seokha Yoo ◽  
Won Ho Kim ◽  
Young-Jin Lim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Pain Sensitivity ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Gynecological Surgery ◽  
Control Groups ◽  
Preoperative Pain ◽  
Pain Scores ◽  
Pressure Pain Thresholds ◽  
Opioid Administration ◽  
And Control

Individualized administration of opioids based on preoperative pain sensitivity may improve postoperative pain profiles. This study aimed to examine whether a predicted administration of opioids could reduce opioid-related adverse effects after gynecological surgery. Patients were randomized to the predicted group or control group. Participants received a preoperative sensory test to measure pressure pain thresholds. Patients were treated with a higher or lower (15 or 10 μg/mL) dose of fentanyl via intravenous patient-controlled analgesia. The opioid dose was determined according to pain sensitivity in the predicted group, while it was determined regardless of pain sensitivity in the control group. The primary outcome was the incidence of nausea over the first 48 h postoperative period. Secondary outcomes included postoperative pain scores and opioid requirements. There was no difference in the incidence of nausea (40.0% vs. 52.5% in predicted and control groups, respectively; p = 0.191) and postoperative pain scores (3.3 vs. 3.5 in predicted and control groups, respectively; p = 0.691). However, opioid consumptions were lower in the predicted group compared to the control group (median 406.0 vs. 526.5 μg; p = 0.042). This study showed that offering a predicted dose of opioids according to pain sensitivity did not affect the incidence of nausea and pain scores.

Psychological interventions to reduce postoperative pain and opioid consumption: a narrative review of literature

2021 ◽  
pp. rapm-2020-102434
Author(s):  
Kevin Gorsky ◽  
Nick D Black ◽  
Ayan Niazi ◽  
Aparna Saripella ◽  
Marina Englesakis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Postoperative Period ◽  
Opioid Consumption ◽  
Psychological Interventions ◽  
Cochrane Central Register ◽  
Relaxation Techniques ◽  
Behavioral Modification ◽  
Opioid Use ◽  
Pain Scores ◽  
Study Results

BackgroundEvidence suggests that over half of patients undergoing surgical procedures suffer from poorly controlled postoperative pain. In the context of an opioid epidemic, novel strategies for ameliorating postoperative pain and reducing opioid consumption are essential. Psychological interventions defined as strategies targeted towards reducing stress, anxiety, negative emotions and depression via education, therapy, behavioral modification and relaxation techniques are an emerging approach towards these endpoints.ObjectiveThis review explores the efficacy of psychological interventions for reducing postoperative pain and opioid use in the acute postoperative period.Evidence reviewAn extensive literature search was conducted in MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Medline In-Process/ePubs, Embase, Ovid Emcare Nursing, and PsycINFO, Web of Science (Clarivate), PubMed-NOT-Medline (NLM), CINAHL and ERIC, and two trials registries, ClinicalTrials.Gov (NIH) and WHO ICTRP. Included studies were limited to those investigating adult human subjects, and those published in English.FindingsThree distinct forms of psychological interventions were identified: relaxation, psychoeducation and behavioral modification therapy. Study results showed a reduction in both postoperative opioid use and pain scores (n=5), reduction in postoperative opioid use (n=3), reduction in postoperative pain (n=5), no significant reduction in pain or opioid use (n=7), increase in postoperative opioid use (n=1) and an increase in postoperative pain (n=1).ConclusionSome preoperative psychological interventions can reduce pain scores and opioid consumption in the acute postoperative period; however, there is a clear need to strengthen the evidence for these interventions. The optimal technique, strategies, timing and interface requires further investigation.

scholarly journals Postoperative Pain and Opioid Use Following Surgical Treatment of Ankle Fractures

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 2473011419S0033
Author(s):  
Matthew Pate ◽  
Jacob Hall ◽  
John Anderson ◽  
Donald Bohay ◽  
John Maskill ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pain Management ◽  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Ankle Fracture ◽  
Management Practices ◽  
Opioid Analgesic ◽  
The United States ◽  
Ankle Fractures ◽  
Opioid Use ◽  
Opioid Prescription ◽  
Opioid Medication

Category: Ankle, Bunion, Trauma Introduction/Purpose: Chronic opioid abuse is one of the greatest public health challenges in the United States. The most common first exposure to opioids comes from acute care prescriptions, such as those after surgery. Moreover, opioids are often prescribed excessively, with current estimates suggesting ˜75% of the pills prescribed are unused. Ankle fractures are the most common operatively treated fracture in orthopaedic surgery, and management of acute pain following surgery is challenging. The optimal perioperative pain regimen is still a point of controversy, as there is limited data available regarding appropriate amount of opioid to prescribe. This study evaluates opioid prescribing techniques of multiple foot and ankle surgeons, and associated patient outcomes. We aim to help surgeons improve their pain management practices and to limit opioid overprescription. Methods: Chart review and phone survey were performed on forty two adult patients within three to six months of ankle fracture fixation at our institution. These patients were offered to voluntarily participate in a standardized questionnaire regarding pain scores, opioid use, non-opioid analgesic use, pain management satisfaction, and patient prescription education. Results: 57% of patients reported that they were given “more” or ”much more” opioid medication than needed, 38% stated that they were given the “right amount”, and 5% reported that they were given ”less” or “much less” than needed. 40.0% were on opioids prior to operation. 53.5% did not require refill of discharge opioid prescriptions, 30.2% of patients did not fill any posteroperative opioid prescription. 16.3% of patients filled their discharge prescription and at least one additionall refill (mean refill = 2.22). Mean number of reported opioid pills taken after surgery was 17.4. Mean satisfaction with overall pain management at phone follow up was 8.6/10. Conclusion: While postoperative pain and management vary substantially, a majority of patients feel that they are given more opioid medication than necessary following ankle fracture repair, and a majority of opioid prescriptions are not completely used. Going forward, it is likely that a majority of patients could experience the same beneficial results with less prescription opioid pain medication, which would reduce overpresciption and potential misuse.

scholarly journals Postoperative Tourniquet Pain in Patients Undergoing Foot and Ankle Surgery

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 2473011418S0042
Author(s):  
Ashish Shah ◽  
Eva Lehtonen ◽  
Samuel Huntley ◽  
Harshadkumar Patel ◽  
John Johnson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Systolic Blood Pressure ◽  
Foot And Ankle ◽  
Opioid Use ◽  
Tourniquet Time ◽  
Pain Scores ◽  
Regional Nerve Block ◽  
Ankle Surgery

Category: Other Introduction/Purpose: The tourniquet is commonly used in orthopedic surgeries on the upper and lower extremities to reduce blood loss, improve visualization, and expedite the surgical procedure. However, tourniquets have been associated with multiple local and systemic complications, including postoperative pain. Guidelines vary regarding ideal tourniquet pressure and duration, while the practice of fixed, high tourniquet pressures remains common. The relationship between tourniquet pressure, duration, and postoperative pain has been studied in various orthopaedic procedures, but these relationships remain unknown in foot and ankle surgery. The purpose of this study was to assess for correlation between excessive tourniquet pressure and duration and the increased incidence of tourniquet pain in foot and ankle surgery patients. Methods: Retrospective chart review was performed for 132 adult patients who underwent foot and ankle surgery with concomitant use of intraoperative tourniquet at a single institution between August and December of 2015. Patients with history of daily opioid use of 30 or more morphine oral equivalents for greater than 30 days, patients who underwent foot and ankle surgery without regional nerve block, patients deemed to have failed regional nerve block, and patients who underwent foot and ankle surgery without tourniquet use were excluded. Patient’s baseline systolic blood pressure, tourniquet pressure and duration, tourniquet deflation time, tourniquet reinflation pressure and duration, intraoperative blood pressure and heart rate changes, intra-operative opioid consumption, PACU pain scores, PACU opioid consumption, and PACU length of stay were collected. Statistical correlation between tourniquet pressure and duration and postoperative pain scores, pain location, narcotic use, and length of stay in PACU was assessed using linear regression in SPSS. Results: Average age of patients was 47.6 years (Range: 16 - 79). Tourniquet pressure was 280 mmHg in 90.6% of patients (Range: 250-300 mmHg). Only 3.8% percent of patients had tourniquet pressures 100-150 mmHg above systolic blood pressure. Mean tourniquet time was 106.2 ± 40.1 min. Tourniquet time showed significant positive correlation with morphine equivalents used in the perioperative period (N = 121; r = 0.406; p < 0.001). Long tourniquet times (= 90 minutes) were associated with greater intraoperative opioid use than short tourniquet times (= 90 minutes) (19 mg ± 22 mg vs. 5 mg ± 11.6 mg; p <0.001). Tourniquet duration and PACU length of stay had a positive association (R2 = 0.4). Conclusion: The majority of cases of foot and ankle surgery at our institution did not adhere to current tourniquet use guidelines, which recommend tourniquet pressure between 100 and 150 mmHg above patient’s systolic blood pressure. Prolonged tourniquet times at high pressures not based on limb occlusion pressure, as observed in our study, lead to increased pain and opioid use and prolonged time in PACU. Basing tourniquet pressures on limb occlusion pressures could likely improve the safety margin of tourniquets, however randomized studies need to be completed to confirm this.

scholarly journals Clinical Evaluation of a Novel Technology for Oral Patient-Controlled Analgesia, the PCoA® Acute Device, for Hospitalized Patients with Postoperative Pain, in Pilot Feasibility Study

2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefan Wirz ◽  
Stefan Conrad ◽  
Ronit Shtrichman ◽  
Kai Schimo ◽  
Eva Hoffmann
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Elective Surgery ◽  
Test Group ◽  
Medication Administration ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Medical Centers ◽  
Novel Technology ◽  
Pain Scores ◽  
Pain Ratings ◽  
Pilot Feasibility Study

Background. Acute postoperative pain delays recovery and increases morbidity and mortality. Traditional administration of postoperative analgesics by nurses is often inefficient. The present study evaluated the safety, efficacy, and usability of a novel, patient-controlled analgesic dispenser, the PCoA Acute. Methods. A controlled pilot study was conducted at three medical centers. Patients scheduled for elective surgery were enrolled into two groups, both taking oral analgesics: a control group (n=43), opioids dispensed by nurses, and a test group (n=27), opioids dispensed via the PCoA Acute. Pill intake data were recorded. Pain ratings at rest and during movement were surveyed. Results. No severe adverse events were recorded. Average pill intake time was reduced from 8 : 58 minutes in the control group to 1 : 17 minutes in the test group (P value < 0.05). The test group took 67% more pills than the control group, indicating enhanced compliance. Pain scores were significantly lower for patients in the test group (P value < 0.05). Over 90% of PCoA Acute users were satisfied with its use. Conclusions. The study confirmed that PCoA Acute is safe and effective. It is well accepted by patients and medical staff. Its use can optimize pain medication administration.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document